20.05.2014 Views

After Heparin: - The Pew Charitable Trusts

After Heparin: - The Pew Charitable Trusts

After Heparin: - The Pew Charitable Trusts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—Chapter 1—<br />

Opos, a company making antibiotics for the U.S. market (see case study 4). Pharmaceutical ingredients<br />

made at uncertified plants may be offered at attractively low prices if the factory is not committing<br />

operating expenses to complying with costly quality standards. Economic incentives may also encourage<br />

the introduction of substitute materials specifically designed to thwart standard tests. <strong>The</strong> adulterant<br />

found in heparin (see case study 1) was almost certainly chosen because it was a cheap substitute for the<br />

genuine product that mimicked the real drug in U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) assays. 193,194<br />

In some cases, companies may remain unaware for years of supplier deception. One Chinese supplier<br />

to U.S. manufacturer International Medication Systems, Limited (IMS) claimed to be a manufacturer of<br />

heparin but in reality was not. This “show” factory, Shanghai No. 1, was registered with the FDA as an<br />

exporter of heparin active ingredient to the United States and had an authorized U.S. agent, Amphastar<br />

Pharmaceuticals Inc., which in 2004 declared to the FDA that heparin was produced at Shanghai No. 1<br />

under GMP conditions. 195 <strong>The</strong> FDA claims that Shanghai No. 1 had in fact been shipping heparin made<br />

at two external plants to the United States since 2001. 196 IMS had been importing this falsely labeled<br />

heparin as early as 2001 according to the FDA, but the fraudulent activity was only discovered seven<br />

years later. Further, the FDA alleges that some heparin shipped to the United States by Shanghai No.<br />

1 in 2008 (but made elsewhere) may have contained the same heparin adulterant associated with U.S.<br />

patient adverse events. 197,198,*<br />

APIs are at particular risk of falsification. One pharmaceutical auditor working in China observed during<br />

inspections and audits that for 39 percent of exported APIs, the final European or American customer<br />

was misinformed about the identity of the manufacturing site where all or part of the manufacturing<br />

took place. 199 He occasionally sees uncertified API concealed in hidden factory rooms or warehouses (see<br />

figure 10). 200 Pharmaceutical brokers and traders have also been responsible for concealing the source of<br />

drug products, and failing to adequately verify the products they buy and sell. For instance, diethylene<br />

glycol (an industrial solvent) has been labeled as glycerin (a common inactive ingredient for cold and<br />

cough syrups) and sold into distribution numerous times, causing hundreds of deaths (see case study 5).<br />

Figure 10<br />

European inspectors in Zhejiang, China, found empty drums<br />

blocking access to part of a certified API plant exporting to<br />

Europe and the United States. Further investigation revealed<br />

a vast warehouse of substandard or falsely certified APIs.<br />

Image courtesy of Philippe André, Associate Professor at the School<br />

of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology at Tianjin University,<br />

China (2008). 201<br />

* Shanghai No. 1 was not part of Baxter Inc.’s heparin supply chain.<br />

30<br />

<strong>Pew</strong> Health Group

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!