20.05.2014 Views

After Heparin: - The Pew Charitable Trusts

After Heparin: - The Pew Charitable Trusts

After Heparin: - The Pew Charitable Trusts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—Chapter 3—<br />

3.3 Barriers to drug tracking and oversight<br />

of distribution<br />

3.3.1 Limits of current drug tracking requirements<br />

Drug distribution occurs nationally or regionally, but wholesalers are registered and regulated at the state<br />

level, usually through the state’s board of pharmacy. <strong>The</strong> FDA and the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration<br />

investigate suspected illegal activity by wholesalers and pharmacies when it crosses state lines,<br />

but states are responsible for most compliance oversight. Both state and federal investigative resources<br />

are limited. Controlled drugs, it should be noted, are subject to separate requirements (see sidebar 4).<br />

In the early 2000s, wholesaler licensure requirements in many states were minimal, presenting attractive<br />

opportunities to individuals willing to abuse the system for profit. In particular, Miami Dade County,<br />

Florida, was associated with a number of high-profile diversion cases in the early 2000s (see case study<br />

7). To the dismay of law-abiding secondary wholesalers, insufficient regulation, combined with large<br />

financial incentives, encouraged the proliferation of bad actors, seriously eroding trust in the secondary<br />

market.<br />

To address this criminal activity, many states have endeavored to tighten their wholesaler licensure<br />

requirements, in some cases based on best-practice standards established by the NABP. 515 As of February<br />

2011, 29 states (as well as the federal government) have established pedigree requirements, according<br />

to HDMA. 516 To address shortfalls in drug tracking, the laws require entities involved in distribution<br />

to maintain “pedigrees,” or transaction histories, of the products they sell. (<strong>The</strong> intent of a pedigree<br />

requirement is to make the concealment of illicit activity more difficult by increasing transparency, and<br />

to support enforcement of responsible purchasing by wholesalers and pharmacies. Weak or nonexistent<br />

tracking systems make it difficult to find stolen merchandise and to implement recalls, when necessary.<br />

For example, the California Department of Public Health estimated that 7,832 patients in the state were<br />

exposed to adulterated heparin after the recalls were issued because of communication failures among<br />

wholesalers, hospitals, hospital pharmacies and the manufacturer. 517<br />

Despite efforts at the state level, weaknesses in regulation remain. Varying state laws make compliance<br />

more complicated for companies operating in more than one state. Wholesalers licensed in states with<br />

weaker oversight may still sell nationally, often without having to meet additional, possibly more stringent,<br />

requirements of other states. Most state pedigree standards allow for paper-based documentation, *<br />

* Colorado, Oregon and California are the only states that require electronic pedigrees. Colorado’s requirement only applies to transactions outside of the<br />

“Normal Supply Chain”—a direct pathway from manufacturer to authorized distributor to pharmacy.<br />

70<br />

<strong>Pew</strong> Health Group

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!