23.05.2014 Views

Diploma thesis

Diploma thesis

Diploma thesis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 Complex harmonic potential<br />

more. Taking the limit ω → ∞ in (4.37) we have to use the limit of the confluent hypergeometric<br />

functions (4.27) and neglect the first term since the exponential function in the second grows<br />

much stronger than every polynomial in ω. Furthermore we calculate from (4.20) that θ → 1<br />

and multiply the whole expression with the denominator of R s so that all remaining terms have<br />

the denominator Γ(a 1 )Γ(a 2 ). This may be also reasonable since in the considered limit we have<br />

ψ s 2 = ψ s on the whole axis so that it should be lim χ→∞ ψ s 2 (χ) = 0. Otherwise the calculation of<br />

R s in (4.34) could include some division by zero. Since the prefactor of the right-hand side, which<br />

is then the numerator of R s , vanishes in the highest order and all terms of the order 2(a 1 + a 2 ) − 1<br />

in ω cancel each other, there remains only one term of order 2(a 1 + a 2 ) − 3 which has to be equal<br />

to zero. Thus the quantization condition for ω → ∞ reads<br />

lim<br />

ω→∞<br />

ω 2(a 1+a 2 )<br />

Γ(a 1 )Γ(a 2 )<br />

= 0. (4.65)<br />

We want to extract a condition for a 2 from that, which is fulfilled (4.65) for all a 1 , since it is not<br />

realized any more in this system for ω → ∞. Eq. (4.65) is always ensured if a 2 is equal to some<br />

negative integer number a 2 = −n. This yields nothing else than the "real limit" for area 2 since<br />

it is the same result for a 2 like for a 1 in the limit c → 0 or ω → 0 when area 2 disappeared.<br />

Nevertheless it is followed by a different energy which is still complex and contains an imaginary<br />

part which is linear in the depth c of the well:<br />

lim a 2 = 1 ω→∞ 4 (1 − ε ∞ − ic) = −n ⇔ ε s ∞ = 4n + 1 − ic (4.66)<br />

For the wave function this provides<br />

⇔<br />

ψ s 2,∞ (χ) = ψ s ∞ (χ) = N s e − 1 2 χ2 1F 1<br />

(<br />

−n; 1 2 ; ω2 )<br />

(<br />

E∞ s = Ω 2n + 1 )<br />

− iC. (4.67)<br />

2<br />

= (−1) n N s n!<br />

(2n)! e− 1 2 χ2 H 2n (χ) . (4.68)<br />

Evaluating the normalization constant (4.45) in the limit ω → ∞ yields<br />

|N s | = 1<br />

|R s |<br />

⎡<br />

⎢<br />

n∑<br />

⎣<br />

µ,ν=0<br />

(−n) ν (−n) µ<br />

ν!µ! ( ) (<br />

1 1<br />

2 2)<br />

ν<br />

µ<br />

(<br />

Γ µ + ν + 1 ) ⎤ −1/2<br />

⎥ ⎦<br />

2<br />

(4.41)<br />

= 1 [ ∫ ∞<br />

∣ (<br />

2 e − 1 ∣∣∣<br />

|R s 2 χ2 1F 1 −n; 1 )∣ ]<br />

∣∣∣ 2 −1/2<br />

| 0<br />

2 ; χ2 dχ<br />

(4.48)<br />

= (2n)!<br />

n! |R s |<br />

(4.56)<br />

= (2n)!<br />

n! |R s |<br />

[∫ ∞<br />

−∞<br />

√<br />

] −1/2<br />

e − 1 2 χ2 |H 2n (χ)| 2 dχ<br />

1<br />

√ π2<br />

2n<br />

(2n)! , (4.69)<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!