WH-âQuestions in Bimodal Bilinguals: Evidence for Language ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Study 1: Monolingual BP comparison data Name Age Range Sess’ns N 1 2;00-‐4;00 53 Gabriela 2 2;04-‐3;10 26 1 Grolla (2005) 2 Sikansi (1999) 24
Study 1: Results – up to 2;11 Par7cipant Sentence-ini7al In situ/Final Double Earliest In situ/Final Ben *.865 .02 .115 2;00 Tom *.92 .07 0 2;04 Igor *.94 .01 .05 2;01 Adam .998 .002 2;08 Eve 1.0 0 -‐-‐ Naomi 1.0 0 -‐-‐ Nina .993 .007 2;09 N 1.0 0 (3;09) Gabriela 1.0 0 -‐-‐ 25
Page 1 and 2: WH-‐Questions in Bimodal Bil
Page 3 and 4: Research Questions • How do t
Page 5 and 6: Foundations of the Model • Ma
Page 7 and 8: Esplugish • Spanish/German used
Page 9 and 10: Bimodal Bilinguals 9
Page 11 and 12: Coda-‐talk • “Coda talk
Page 13 and 14: Binational Bimodal Bilingual (Bi
Page 15 and 16: WH-‐Questions in English and
Page 17 and 18: Predictions of the Synthesis mo
Page 19 and 20: WH-‐in-‐situ in ASL-‐
Page 21 and 22: Study 1: Spontaneous Production
Page 23: Study 1: Monolingual English co
Page 27 and 28: Study 2: Elicited Production
Page 29 and 30: Study 2: Results - Brazil Par-
Page 31 and 32: Spoken Language Structures in S
Page 33 and 34: Study 3: Spontaneous Production
Page 35 and 36: Study 4: Elicited Production Sp
Page 37 and 38: Study 4: Results - US Subject
Page 39 and 40: Study 3+4: Discussion • Like
Page 41 and 42: Discussion • The kinds of ‘

WH-âQuestions in Bimodal Bilinguals: Evidence for Language ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

WH-âQuestions in Bimodal Bilinguals: Evidence for Language ...