30.05.2014 Views

MEASURE Communication Final Report - Population Reference ...

MEASURE Communication Final Report - Population Reference ...

MEASURE Communication Final Report - Population Reference ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 <strong>MEASURE</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

Following the release of new materials, <strong>MEASURE</strong><br />

<strong>Communication</strong> broadcast their availability via e-mail to<br />

numerous U.S. and international listservs and posted them<br />

on the project’s and PRB’s websites. The materials were also<br />

regularly displayed and disseminated at professional conferences<br />

(PAA, APHA, and GHC) and international technical<br />

and policy forums, such as numerous Cairo+5 meetings<br />

in 1999, Beijing+5 meetings in 2000, and the World<br />

Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002.<br />

Evidence of impact<br />

Orders for publications after initial mailings were a key<br />

indicator that <strong>MEASURE</strong> <strong>Communication</strong> publications<br />

contributed to policy learning by maintaining a steady flow<br />

of information. Over the course of the project, PRB<br />

received nearly 43,000 requests for a total of 344,101 copies<br />

of publications. Forty-one percent of these copies went to<br />

recipients in Africa, 20 percent to Latin America and the<br />

Caribbean, and 15 percent to South and Southeast Asia<br />

(see Table 3). The large demand for print materials in<br />

Africa probably resulted from the relevance of the materials<br />

to that continent’s reproductive health problems and the<br />

dearth of materials available locally (frequently mentioned<br />

in questionnaires and key informant interviews). Beginning<br />

in 2001, the bounceback questionnaires asked recipients to<br />

estimate how many people would SEE the reports and how<br />

many would USE them. In the 5,035 questionnaires that<br />

contained responses to these questions, recipients stated<br />

that a total of 630,716 people would see the reports and<br />

163,733 would use them. This represents an average of 125<br />

people seeing each copy, and 33 people using it. While<br />

these are estimates, it is clear that readership far exceeded<br />

the number of initial recipients.<br />

More requests originated in the United States (11 percent<br />

of additional copies distributed) than any other<br />

country because USAID cooperating agencies often<br />

requested copies for redistribution to their projects’ audiences<br />

in developing countries. Apart from these requests,<br />

TABLE 3<br />

COPIES OF INTERNATIONAL<br />

PUBLICATIONS REQUESTED, BY REGION<br />

Region<br />

% copies requested<br />

Sub-Saharan Africa 41<br />

Latin America & Caribbean 21<br />

South & Southeast Asia 15<br />

North America 11<br />

Oceania 7<br />

Middle East & North Africa 3<br />

Western Europe 1<br />

Eastern Europe & Eurasia 1<br />

25 percent of requests came from four developing countries<br />

(see Table 4), and 34 percent of requests came from<br />

the top six countries.<br />

In all, nearly 43,000 requests came from about 150<br />

countries, and roughly 40 percent of all organizational<br />

entries on the mailing list requested a publication. Some<br />

organizations repeatedly requested additional copies for<br />

distribution to their staff, field offices, and affiliates—and<br />

for redistribution in conferences and training workshops.<br />

While it is not possible to display the diversity of organizations<br />

here, Table 5 (page 15) lists those organizations<br />

that requested more than 1,000 copies of publications<br />

(multiple orders for multiple publications). These organizations<br />

represent diverse fields and countries, but most<br />

can be characterized as having both policy and educational<br />

missions in their countries and communities.<br />

The bounceback questionnaires included with all publications<br />

gathered evidence of policy learning through<br />

several multiple choice and open-ended questions.<br />

Readers could respond to multiple choice questions rating<br />

the usefulness and selecting from a range of possible uses.<br />

Open-ended questions asked readers to describe how the<br />

materials were used and whether the materials changed<br />

their views. The thousands of responses provided<br />

glimpses of incremental learning in many facets of<br />

national life as well as decisionmaking at a grassroots<br />

level. The following are illustrative examples from three<br />

publications that focused on reproductive health.<br />

Regarding “New <strong>Population</strong> Policies: Advancing<br />

Women’s Health and Rights”:<br />

It will be very helpful for policy development of women’s<br />

RH rights and designing programs.<br />

—Assistant Director, Women’s Program,<br />

Family Planning Association of Bangladesh,<br />

Dhaka, Bangladesh<br />

TABLE 4<br />

TOP 10 DEVELOPING COUNTRIES<br />

REQUESTING INTERNATIONAL<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

Country<br />

% copies requested<br />

India 8<br />

Nigeria 7<br />

Ghana 6<br />

Kenya 5<br />

Philippines 5<br />

Zimbabwe 3<br />

Bolivia 3<br />

Uganda 3<br />

Pakistan 2<br />

Peru 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!