30.05.2014 Views

Epistles of John - The Preterist Archive

Epistles of John - The Preterist Archive

Epistles of John - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—<br />

XVI<br />

ST JOHN THE APOSTLE, AND HIS WRITINGS.<br />

sense in which he supplements or completes the Synoptists.<br />

has been already observed that St <strong>John</strong>, according to his individual<br />

endowment and personal peculiarity, was the only one<br />

who was overruled to seize and retain certain individual aspects<br />

<strong>of</strong> the nature and the doctrine <strong>of</strong> Jesus. First, to wit, those<br />

utterances <strong>of</strong> our Lord concerning His eternal relation to the<br />

Father, and His eternal, pre-temporal and supra-temporal, oneness<br />

<strong>of</strong> essence with the Father (<strong>John</strong> iii. 13, 17, v. 17, vi. 33,<br />

51, vii. 16, 28, viii. 58)— an aspect <strong>of</strong> the teaching <strong>of</strong> Christ<br />

which, in opposition to that which the Lord lays down concerning<br />

His historical work upon earth, and his historical relation<br />

to men, may assuredly with perfect propriety be described as<br />

" the speculative aspect," and to the apprehension <strong>of</strong> which a<br />

" philosophical" tone and culture <strong>of</strong> mind (using this expression,<br />

<strong>of</strong> course, in the widest sense) must be supposed. 1 But,<br />

secondly, also those sayings <strong>of</strong> our Lord concerning the mystical<br />

relation <strong>of</strong> unity and fellowship <strong>of</strong> life into which He would<br />

enter with His people through the Holy Spirit. (<strong>John</strong> iii. 8,<br />

ch. vi., ch. xiv. 16 seq., xv. 1 seq., xvii. 21-23.) <strong>The</strong> question<br />

now arises, whether the individuality and personal characteristics<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Apostle was the only factor in the case ; whether it was<br />

this alone which prompted him to supplement and perfect the<br />

picture which the Synoptists had given <strong>of</strong> the person and teaching<br />

<strong>of</strong> Christ (mark, not that he invented or feigned anything<br />

new and unhistorical, but that he gave a representation <strong>of</strong> an<br />

aspect <strong>of</strong> the historical and real Christ which he alone had apprehended<br />

in all its depth and fulness), or whether there was<br />

also co-operating, as the second factor, an actual necessity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Church, which was beginning to be pressingly felt at the period<br />

when St <strong>John</strong> wrote.<br />

He who should hesitate to admit this, must be prepared to<br />

deny that the providential wisdom <strong>of</strong> God had assigned to St<br />

<strong>John</strong> any peculiar and independent vocation in the joint apostolical<br />

work <strong>of</strong> founding the Church. St Peter and St Matthew<br />

had it for their vocation to found the Christian Church among<br />

the people <strong>of</strong> Israel, and to bear their testimony to Jesus as the<br />

Fulfiller <strong>of</strong> the prophecies ; the same St Peter and St Mark<br />

had it for their vocation first to bear the tidings concerning<br />

It<br />

1<br />

Against LutliarJt, S. 227.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!