30.05.2014 Views

Epistles of John - The Preterist Archive

Epistles of John - The Preterist Archive

Epistles of John - The Preterist Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

—;<br />

THE EPISTOLARY FORM. 3<br />

entirely wanting at the commencement.<br />

<strong>The</strong> author does not<br />

mention himself, nor does he specify his readers, nor does he<br />

address them with the greeting <strong>of</strong> peace. For the circumstance<br />

that St <strong>John</strong> wrote the Epistle, ch. i. 4, " that their joy might<br />

be full," is most assuredly not to be regarded as standing in the<br />

place <strong>of</strong> the epistolary yaipeiv :<br />

this was not recorded, as Diisterdieck<br />

thinks, " because St <strong>John</strong> had the customary yaipzw in<br />

his mind" (compare the Commentary on this passage). Our<br />

Epistle is altogether destitute <strong>of</strong> the greeting. We have only<br />

one parallel case—that <strong>of</strong> the Epistle to the Hebrews. But<br />

we have seen (in our Introduction to that Epistle) that that<br />

production lacks in many other respects the stamp <strong>of</strong> a proper<br />

letter, and especially that free outpouring <strong>of</strong> thought which is<br />

essential to it ;<br />

a treatise<br />

and therefore, that it must be regarded rather as<br />

designed for careful study and repeated perusal, than<br />

as a letter or communication in the ordinary sense. It may be<br />

added, moreover, that, in the case <strong>of</strong> the Epistle to the Hebrews,<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> personal superscription and address has another<br />

explanation ; viz., the fact—which hardly admits <strong>of</strong> doubt<br />

that it was written only under the commission <strong>of</strong> the Apostle<br />

Paul, and not by his own hand. But none <strong>of</strong> these "explanations<br />

can be applied to the First Epistle <strong>of</strong> St <strong>John</strong> : it was<br />

not, as we have seen, a production sent forth in the form <strong>of</strong> a<br />

treatise, but a thoroughly epistolary outpouring <strong>of</strong> thought and<br />

feeling; and then it was, as we shall see, absolutely and distinctively<br />

from the very hand <strong>of</strong> the Apostle himself. This<br />

makes the absence <strong>of</strong> introductory greeting doubly strange<br />

and, in connection with this circumstance, the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

every<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> benedictory greeting at the close will appear equally<br />

remarkable. For even the Epistle to the Hebrews, which in<br />

its character and design is very much more like a treatise, yet<br />

at least in the close introduces a tw<strong>of</strong>old benediction (Heb.<br />

xiii. 20, 21, and 25) and greeting (ver. 24). But here everything<br />

<strong>of</strong> the kind is wanting.<br />

We may therefore venture to say that the First Epistle <strong>of</strong><br />

St <strong>John</strong> is <strong>of</strong> the essence <strong>of</strong> an actual epistle, but does not bear<br />

the form <strong>of</strong> one.<br />

This, however, needs its own explanation.<br />

It must be held to be possible that an Apostle should send<br />

to a church, or to a circle <strong>of</strong> churches, an epistle, without naming<br />

his own name, the name <strong>of</strong> the author. <strong>The</strong>re was not then

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!