01.06.2014 Views

APPENDIX I Toxicity Identification Evaluation Reports for Chollas ...

APPENDIX I Toxicity Identification Evaluation Reports for Chollas ...

APPENDIX I Toxicity Identification Evaluation Reports for Chollas ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Toxicity</strong> <strong>Identification</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> of <strong>Chollas</strong> Creek<br />

Stormwater using Hyalella azteca<br />

Results<br />

August 2006<br />

The 0.025 mg/L PBO treatment increased toxicity in the 100 percent sample concentration (0%<br />

survival) relative to toxicity in the unmanipulated Baseline test (80% survival in the 100 percent<br />

sample concentration). The NOEC was less than 50%, and the LC 50 was 32.5%. Survival in<br />

the 0.025 mg/L PBO treatment blank was 86.7%. The 0.050 mg/L PBO treatment also<br />

increased toxicity in the 100 percent sample concentration (20% survival) relative to toxicity in<br />

the unmanipulated Baseline test (80% survival in the 100 percent sample concentration). The<br />

NOEC was less than 50%, and the LC 50 was 27.27%. Survival in the 0.050 mg/L PBO<br />

treatment blank was 80 percent. The increase of toxicity in these manipulations suggests that<br />

pyrethroids may be a causative agent in this stormwater sample. Specifically, it is well-known<br />

that sublethal concentrations of PBO potentiate the toxicity of pyrethroids (Budavari, 1989).<br />

A copper sulfate reference toxicant was tested at nominal concentrations of 62.5, 125, 250, 500<br />

and 1000 µg Cu 2+ /L. The calculated 96-hour LC 50 (189.41 µg Cu 2+ /L) was within two standard<br />

deviations of the laboratory mean (365.19 µg Cu 2+ /L) at the time of testing. This indicates that<br />

the sensitivity of H. azteca used in this evaluation fell within the normal range.<br />

Survival of H. azteca in three of the treatment blanks (Aeration, Filtration, and Methanol Elution<br />

tests) was lower than expected. While reference toxicant tests demonstrated adequate<br />

sensitivity of these test organisms, these tests use a higher volume of water (200 mL) than in<br />

the TIE tests (50 mL), which likely is preferred by these test organisms. It is also possible that<br />

test organisms used in the October TIE tests were more sensitive. More specifically, lower<br />

tolerance to test conditions and lower survival in three of the treatment blanks may be related to<br />

the source and age of the test organisms. Due to the last second nature of the October<br />

stormwater sampling event, there was not sufficient time as to allow <strong>for</strong> the ordering of test<br />

organisms from the standard source (i.e. Aquatic Indicators). Thus the organisms used in the<br />

October TIE were those cultured according to standard protocols at Weston. As a result, slight<br />

differences in age and source of organisms may explain the low tolerance to TIE test conditions,<br />

and slightly reduced survival in the three treatment blanks.<br />

4.1.2 Summary of TIE Per<strong>for</strong>med on the October 18, 2005 Stormwater Sample<br />

The results from the Phase I TIE per<strong>for</strong>med on the <strong>Chollas</strong> Creek stormwater sample collected<br />

in October indicated that pyrethroids may be the cause of the toxicity observed in the initial<br />

toxicity tests. First, in the Baseline test, toxicity of H. azteca exposed to diluted and undiluted<br />

stormwater (80 to 100% survival) was significantly lower than that in the initial toxicity test (7.5<br />

to 42.5% survival). This indicates that during the time elapsed between the initial and baseline<br />

toxicity tests, the causative agent in the stormwater sample had degraded, or had significantly<br />

adsorbed to the plastic container in which the sample was held. Pyrethroids are known to<br />

adsorb to plastic, thus leading to a time-dependent reduction in toxicity (Wheelock et al., 2005).<br />

Second, the lack of toxicity reduction in the EDTA, STS, graduated pH, and aeration treatments<br />

indicates that the causative agent was likely not a metal, an oxidative chemical, a pH-sensitive<br />

chemical, or a volatile chemical or surfactant, respectively. However, the reduction in toxicity of<br />

H. azteca following filtration of the stormwater sample indicates that the causative agent was<br />

highly bound to particulates in the sample. Pyrethroids have physicochemical properties that<br />

match the results of the present TIE; pyrethroids are insoluble in water but soluble in solvents<br />

(have high K ow s), have low vapor pressures (indicating low volatility), and have high adsorption<br />

coefficients, indicating their tendency to adsorb to particulates (Kidd and James, 1991). In<br />

addition, toxicity was significantly increased in the diluted and undiluted PBO-treated stormwater<br />

samples, as compared to toxicity in the baseline test (untreated diluted and undiluted<br />

stormwater). These results also indicate pyrethroids as the causative agents because pyrethroid<br />

toxicity is potentiated by PBO (Budavari, 1989).<br />

Weston Solutions, Inc. 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!