01.06.2014 Views

APPENDIX I Toxicity Identification Evaluation Reports for Chollas ...

APPENDIX I Toxicity Identification Evaluation Reports for Chollas ...

APPENDIX I Toxicity Identification Evaluation Reports for Chollas ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Toxicity</strong> <strong>Identification</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> of Sweetwater<br />

River Stormwater Using Selenastrum<br />

capricornutum August 2006<br />

6. REFERENCES<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). 1994. Water Quality Control Plan<br />

<strong>for</strong> the San Diego Basin. September.<br />

Kaiser Engineers. 1969. Final Report to the State of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, San Francisco Bay-Delta Water<br />

Quality Control Program, State of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, Sacramento, CA.<br />

LeBlond, J.B., and Duffy, L.K. 2001. <strong>Toxicity</strong> assessment of total dissolved solids in effluent of<br />

Alaskan mines using 22-h chronic Microtox® and Selenastrum capricornutum assays. The<br />

Science of the Total Environment, 271:49-59.<br />

Mount, D.R., Gulley, D.D., Hockett, J.R., Garrison, T.D., and Evans, J.M. 1997. Statistical<br />

models to predict the toxicity of major ions to Ceriodaphnia dubia, Daphnia magna and<br />

Pimephales promelas (fathead minnows). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,<br />

16:2009-2019.<br />

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1991. Methods <strong>for</strong> Aquatic <strong>Toxicity</strong><br />

<strong>Identification</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong>s. Phase I <strong>Toxicity</strong> Characterization Procedures. EPA/600/6-91/003.<br />

EPA Office of Research and Development. Second Edition. February.<br />

_________. 1992. <strong>Toxicity</strong> <strong>Identification</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong>. Characterization of Chronically Toxic<br />

Effluents, Phase I. EPA/600/6-91/005F. EPA Office of Research and Development. May.<br />

_________. 1993a. Methods <strong>for</strong> Aquatic <strong>Toxicity</strong> <strong>Identification</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong>s. Phase II <strong>Toxicity</strong><br />

Characterization Procedures <strong>for</strong> Samples Exhibiting Acute and Chronic <strong>Toxicity</strong> EPA/600/R-<br />

92/080. EPA Office of Research and Development. September.<br />

_________. 1993b. Methods <strong>for</strong> Aquatic <strong>Toxicity</strong> <strong>Identification</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong>s. Phase III <strong>Toxicity</strong><br />

Characterization Procedures <strong>for</strong> Samples Exhibiting Acute and Chronic <strong>Toxicity</strong> EPA/600/R-<br />

92/081. EPA Office of Research and Development. September.<br />

_________. 2002. Short-Term Methods <strong>for</strong> Estimating the Chronic <strong>Toxicity</strong> of Effluents and<br />

Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms. EPA-821-R02-013. EPA Office of Water.<br />

Fourth Edition. October.<br />

Weston Solutions, Inc. (Weston). 2005. San Diego County Municipal Copermittees 2004-2005<br />

Urban Runoff Monitoring. Final Report. For the County of San Diego, San Diego, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia.<br />

December.<br />

Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4 th Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.<br />

Weston Solutions, Inc. 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!