08.06.2014 Views

Vol. 14 N° 1, 2013 - UNESP Rio Claro

Vol. 14 N° 1, 2013 - UNESP Rio Claro

Vol. 14 N° 1, 2013 - UNESP Rio Claro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Book reviews<br />

The perception of chemistry of first-year undergraduate students at the University of Buenos Aires<br />

The analysis shows as well that first-year undergraduates have a disciplinary<br />

conception in which the ideas of inter- or trans-disciplinarity are absent.<br />

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

The study of these perceptions allows us to reflect and make instructional<br />

decisions (Di Risio et al., 2009b) in order to provide a positive influence on<br />

teachers doing and learning within the frame of a massive introductory course.<br />

Particularly, the idea of a negative image of Chemistry, allegedly “polluting<br />

/ prejudicial / dangerous”, was already identified as an object of inquiry after<br />

frequent statements made in research articles (Stocklmayer and Gilbert,<br />

2002). However, along various bodies of our work, we find that few students<br />

do actually have such conceptions.<br />

Chemistry’s positive or negative image, according to what we recollected<br />

at interviews and workshops, seems to be more related to student academic<br />

situations than to their view of Chemistry as a discipline (Figure 2e, although<br />

these representations were not majority). This is in agreement with reports<br />

on the perception of the discipline of primary and high school students and<br />

teachers in the United Kingdom (House of Lords, 2000).<br />

f mary primary and and high high school school students students and and teachers teachers in the in United the United Kingdom Kingdom (House (House of of<br />

mary and and high high school students and and teachers in in the the United Kingdom (House of of<br />

, ords, 2000). 2000).<br />

, 2000).<br />

a) a., Chemical a) Chemical symbols symbols and and formulas formulas and formulas<br />

a) a) Chemical symbols and and formulas<br />

b) Associations b) Associations with with laboratory laboratory work work<br />

b) b) Associations with with laboratory work<br />

b. Associations with laboratory work<br />

c) References<br />

c.<br />

c) References to the the to submicroscopic the submicroscopic level<br />

level<br />

level<br />

c) c) References to to the the submicroscopic level<br />

d) d. Metaphorical d) Metaphorical conceptions conceptions conceptions<br />

d) d) Metaphorical conceptions<br />

Figure 2: Categories for pictorial representations of “Chemistry”<br />

a. Stress on the condition of students of undergraduate Chemistry<br />

A global analysis of the responses suggests that the information known<br />

by our students is vague and diffuse; the relationship between Chemistry<br />

and food and medicines is most frequently quoted. Nevertheless and<br />

despite the difficulties for the study of Chemistry as an academic subject<br />

often remarked by students, their attitude towards the discipline is mostly<br />

positive. They consider Chemistry as an important discipline for their<br />

university careers and generally appreciate its applications and influence<br />

igure 2: Categories 2: Categories for pictorial for pictorial representations representations of “Chemistry” of “Chemistry”<br />

2: 2: Categories for for pictorial representations of of “Chemistry”<br />

e) Stress e) Stress on the on condition the condition of students of students of undergraduate of undergraduate Chemistry Chemistry<br />

e) e) Stress on on the the condition of of students of of undergraduate Chemistry<br />

in everyday life, although probably with a very limited knowledge of what<br />

it really is and the benefits this “central Science” (Shaik, 2003) provides<br />

to Society as a whole.<br />

During the inquiry process here analyzed, it was expected that students<br />

graphical and verbal representations were influenced by what they learnt<br />

about the discipline during their high school education (the survey was<br />

presented at the beginning of the CBC course and Chemistry is taught during<br />

high school final stage). Even though the nature of the responses seems to<br />

support this hypothesis, repeating the inquiry with 399 high school students<br />

during their final three years at this educational level (and therefore with<br />

different curricular backgrounds of the discipline) showed similar answers<br />

to those of the new undergraduates. Therefore it is true to say that their<br />

ideas about the discipline come straight and exclusively from that period<br />

of schooling. In fact, some authors have speculated that the general public<br />

considers Chemistry as a body of knowledge reserved to scholars (Wallace<br />

and Louden, 2000) and others (House of Lords, 2000) found that the<br />

discipline is perceived, at the primary and high school levels, as “boring”<br />

(opinion also shared by quite a few teachers). Considered altogether, this<br />

information suggests that it is not expected that those levels of schooling<br />

can provide at present any substantial input to a significant learning process<br />

of the discipline.<br />

Several authors have written about the perception of Chemistry<br />

by students considering their learning experiences and the discipline as an<br />

instructional object (Millar, 1996; Pilling et al., 2001; Gutwill-Wise, 2001).<br />

On the other hand, there is no such information available when it comes<br />

to the perception of Chemistry as a discipline of social relevance without<br />

considering student experiences inside the educational system. We consider<br />

it valuable to have specific information about this scenario, which will foster<br />

the improvement of our instructional tools considering not their allegedly<br />

negative image about Chemistry, but rather their general and vague (but<br />

positive nevertheless) one.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

We thank the University of Buenos Aires for support for this work through<br />

grants UBACyT U-401 and UBACyT 20020090200046.<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

Di Risio C., Bruno, J., Ghini, A., Guerrien, D., Rusler, V., Vázquez, I., Veleiro, A. Tópicos<br />

de acercamiento como estrategia didáctica en el curso de Química. En Un espacio<br />

para el diálogo, Primera Jornada de Intercambio de Experiencias Pedagógicas.<br />

Ciclo Básico Común, UBA. Buenos Aires, 8 de agosto de 2009.<br />

Di Risio C., Bruno J., Ghini A., Guerrien D., Rusler V. y Veleiro A. Acciones orientadas<br />

a trabajar las representaciones acerca de la Química de los alumnos de un primer<br />

curso universitario. En: Actas del Primer Congreso Internacional de Pedagogía<br />

Universitaria, pág 621-626, 2009a<br />

Gimeno Sacristán, J. en Prólogo a Stenhouse L., Investigación y desarrollo del currículum,<br />

Ed. Morata, Madrid, 1984.<br />

Gutwill-Wise, J. The impact of active and context-based learning in introductory<br />

chemistry courses: An early evaluation of the modular approach. Journal of<br />

Chemical Education, 77 (5), 684-690, 2001.<br />

House of Lords . Report of the Select Committee on science and society. London: House<br />

of Lords, 2000.<br />

Izquierdo Aymerich M. Conferencia Plenaria de las VI Jornadas Nacionales y III<br />

Internacionales de Enseñanza Universitaria de la Química, septiembre-octubre de<br />

2003, La Plata, 2003.<br />

Lifsyc S. y Iacobellis M. Graduados universitarios y prácticas sociales. En: Actas de<br />

las II Jornadas Nacionales de Representaciones Sociales, Facultad de Psicología,<br />

Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2007.<br />

Millar, R.H. Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science<br />

Review, 77 (280), 7-18, 1996.<br />

Pilling, G., Holman, J. and Waddington, D. The Salters experience. Education in<br />

Chemistry, 38 (5), 131-136, 2001.<br />

Shaik S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 3208–3215, 2003.<br />

Stocklmayer S. y Gilbert J. Informal chemical education. En J. Gilbert et al (eds),<br />

Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice: <strong>14</strong>3-164, Ed. Kluwer<br />

Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 2002.<br />

Wallace, J. y Louden, W. Teachers´leanrning: Stories in science education.<br />

Dordrecht:Kluwer, 2000.<br />

Received 17-05- 2011/ Approved 29-11-201<br />

JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION - Nº 1, <strong>Vol</strong>. <strong>14</strong>, pp. 29-31, <strong>2013</strong>, ISSN 0124-5481, www.accefyn.org.co/rec<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!