12.06.2014 Views

Sexualisation of Young People Review

Sexualisation of Young People Review

Sexualisation of Young People Review

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Sexualisation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Young</strong> <strong>People</strong> <strong>Review</strong><br />

game Rape-Lay, which was for a while<br />

available to buy online via Amazon.com’s<br />

marketplace platform, players take on<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> a rapist who stalks a mother<br />

before raping her and her daughters.<br />

There has also been a marked increase<br />

in the number <strong>of</strong> games depicting various<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> sexual abuse. 233<br />

Many popular video games effectively<br />

reward children for engaging in violent,<br />

illegal activity, albeit virtually. The potential<br />

negative effects are compounded by the<br />

fact that so many children are playing<br />

these games alone. The point was made<br />

during the evidence sessions that, while<br />

most parents are unlikely to let their child<br />

watch an 18-rated film, their attitude<br />

to age-inappropriate games is more<br />

lenient, perhaps due to their own lack <strong>of</strong><br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> the games’ themes and<br />

content.<br />

The link between violent content and<br />

aggression has been cited in several<br />

studies 234 and although it is overly<br />

simplistic to make a direct link between<br />

cause and effect, Byron concluded it is<br />

widely accepted that exposure to content<br />

that children are either emotionally or<br />

cognitively not mature enough for can<br />

have a potentially negative impact. 235<br />

This is backed up by children themselves:<br />

in a recent Ofcom survey, two-thirds<br />

<strong>of</strong> 12–15-year-olds said they believed<br />

that violence in games had more <strong>of</strong> an<br />

impact on behaviour than violence on TV<br />

or in films. 236<br />

Several studies in the past have suggested<br />

that violent content can impact behaviour<br />

increasing aggression in children and young<br />

people. The same learning processes that<br />

underlie these effects are also likely to<br />

work with sexualised content affecting<br />

sex-role beliefs, emotions and behaviour. 237<br />

Mobile devices<br />

The proliferation <strong>of</strong> media and the<br />

increased accessibility <strong>of</strong> all kinds <strong>of</strong><br />

content is nowhere better illustrated<br />

than by the growth in the mobile phone<br />

market. By the age <strong>of</strong> nine, 52 per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> British children have a phone; by the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 15, that figure has risen to 95 per<br />

cent. 238 Mobile phones allow young people<br />

easy access to all kinds <strong>of</strong> online content,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> whether or not it is age<br />

appropriate.<br />

The mobile porn industry<br />

The global mobile porn industry<br />

is currently worth an estimated<br />

$2 billion. 239 Figures show that, in 2007,<br />

mobile phones were the UK’s biggest<br />

distributor <strong>of</strong> pornography. 240 Globally,<br />

telecoms companies made $1.7 billion<br />

from ‘adult content’. Evidence suggests<br />

that a high proportion <strong>of</strong> queries<br />

made via mobile phone relate to<br />

241, 242<br />

adult content.<br />

239240241242<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> mobile phones as a tool for<br />

bullying, controlling or monitoring a datingpartner<br />

has attracted considerable media<br />

attention recently, and was frequently<br />

raised during the evidence sessions held<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> this review. 243 Mobile phones<br />

are also being used for so-called ‘sexting’<br />

48<br />

233<br />

Martinez and Manolovitz (2009)<br />

234<br />

Anderson and Dill (2000); Freedman (2002);<br />

Deselms and Altman (2003)<br />

235<br />

Byron (2008)<br />

236<br />

Ofcom (2008)<br />

237<br />

Dill and Thill (2007)<br />

238<br />

Ofcom (2008)<br />

239<br />

Juniper Research, cited in Daw and Cabb (2009)<br />

240<br />

Juniper Research, cited in Daw and Cabb (2009)<br />

241<br />

Kamvar and Baluja (2006)<br />

242<br />

Church and Smyth et al. (2007)<br />

243<br />

Evidence Hearing Sessions for the <strong>Review</strong><br />

(May 2009 – July 2010)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!