16.06.2014 Views

RSCH.016.001.1136 - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission

RSCH.016.001.1136 - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission

RSCH.016.001.1136 - 2009 Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RSCH.016.001.1161<br />

<strong>Bushfires</strong> 21<br />

· Cooperation and stakeholder participation varies across districts;<br />

· That the dual accountability issue for Fire Control Officers had not been resolved;<br />

· Communications require improvement and further work – with respect to radio<br />

communications in particular;<br />

· Aircraft have limited effectiveness in bushfire suppression;<br />

· There is a need for adequate post fire evaluation;<br />

· There is a duplication of resources (stations, equipment and personnel) in many areas<br />

of the state;<br />

· There is no automatic linkage of Standards of Fire Cover (SOFC) to the resource<br />

bidding process;<br />

· Hazard reduction strategies need improvement and greater guidance and assistance<br />

needs to be provided to local communities in this regard;<br />

· There is an uneven distribution of trainers and assessors in NSW which has led to<br />

varying fire fighting competency levels.<br />

The Government and Rural Fire Service have made several changes in response to the<br />

Auditor-General’s report, most notably the dual accountability of Fire Control Officers.<br />

From July 1 2001 the Officers were transferred from local government employment to the<br />

control of the Rural Fire Service.<br />

3.4 NSW Legislative Council, General Purpose Standing Committee No 5, Report<br />

on Inquiry into the NSW Rural Fire Service, June 2000.<br />

The Committee self referred its reference to inquire and report on the adequacy of fire<br />

suppression services provided by the Rural Fire Service. Apart from the Auditor-General’s<br />

Report as noted above, the Committee’s review of the Service was the first since the new<br />

Act commenced. The Committee noted that there had clearly been a transformation of the<br />

Service in the last decade. It identified a move towards a more professional Service with<br />

a greater emphasis on safety. It was also acknowledged by the Committee that the Service<br />

was very responsive to the Inquiry, which pre-empted the need to make recommendations<br />

in certain areas. 48<br />

The Legislative Council Committee made recommendations on a wide diversity of issues,<br />

including: distribution of resources; training; communications; and roles and duties of Fire<br />

Control Officers.<br />

4.0 BUSHFIRE HAZARD REDUCTION WORKS<br />

A recurring debate throughout the bushfire and fire ecology literature, as well as the wider<br />

community, is the effectiveness of hazard reduction burns in controlling bushfires. This<br />

48<br />

NSW Legislative Council, General Purpose Standing Committee No 5, Report on Inquiry into<br />

the NSW Rural Fire Service. Report No 6 June 2000 at xv.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!