IWMP-1 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State

11 

2010- 

Detail Project Report 

SANKOI PROJECT (IWMP- I) 

PIA: WEST FOREST DIVISION - RAJPIPLA

Chapter 1 Project Background 

Table of Contents 

1.1Project Background……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……………....…....................................................................... 09 

Table no: 1 Basic Project Information ……………………………………………….……………………………..……………………..................................................................... 09 

Figure,1 Geographic location of Sankoi Project............................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme. ………………………………………………………………………………...................................................................…. 11 

Table no. 2: Weightage of the project. …………………………………………………………………….……...……..................................................................................……… 11 

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ……………………………………………………………………............…………................................ 12 

Table no.3: Watershed information …….………………………………………………………………………………………………........................................………………..…… 13 

1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Sankoi Project …………….……………………………….............................................. …………..……14 

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ........................................................................................................ ...................................... 15 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area ........................................................................................................................................................15 

Figure,2 Geographical Condition of Sankoi project........................................................................................................................................................ ............................. 16 

Chapter 2 Project Implementing Agency 

2.1. Project Implementing Agency .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 

2.2 About Project implementing Agency West Forest Division - Rajpipla....................................................................................................................................... 17 

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: .................................................................... ................................................................................................................................ 17 

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18 

Table no. 6: PIA: .......................................................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................. 19 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: ....................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................... 19 

West Forest Division- Rajpipla Page 2

Chapter 3 Basic Information of the Project Area 

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology .................. ....................................................................... .............................................................................................. ........................ 20 

3.1.1 Land use pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..... 20 

Table no. 8: Land use pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21 

3.1.2 Soil and topography: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................. 21 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ........................................................................................................................... ............................................................................... 22 

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 

Table no. 11: Soil Erosion ............................................................................................................................................................................................ ................. ....................... 23 

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ... ............................... .......................................................................... ........................................................ 23 

Table no. 11.3:Water logging condition ......................................................................................................................... ............................................................................... 24 

Table no.12: Climatic conditions .................................................................................................................................................................. .................................................... 24 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 25 

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: ................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................ 25 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details......................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................... 26 

Table no. 15: Agriculture ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 26 

Table no. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................. ......................................................................................................................................... 27 

Table no. 17: Crop details: .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28 

Figure ,3 Photographs of Bio-Physical Survey. ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 29 

3.1.4 Livestock: .................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................... 30 

Table no. 18: Livestock .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30 

3.1.5 Drinking water ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ .................................. 31 


Table no. 19 : Drinking water...................................................................................................................................................................................................................... .... 31 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ....................... ..................................................................................................................................................... 31 

3.2. Socio-Economic Profile .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33 

3.2.1 Demographic Status: ................................................................................................................................ ................................................................................................... 33 

Table no. 21: Demographic information ................................................................................................................................ ............................................ .......................... 33 

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ...................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................. 34 

3.2.2 Migration Pattern: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ................... 34 

Table no. 23: Migration details .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 

Table no. 24: Poverty............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 

3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities: ................................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................... 36 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................... .................................................................... 36 

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37 

Figure,4: Photographs of PRA.................................................................................................................................................................... ...................................................... 38 

3.3. Livelihood pattern: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............. 39 

Table no. 27: Per capita Income .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39 

3.4 Dependence on Common Property Resource.............................................................. ...................................................................................................................... ... 39 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ........................................................................................................... ...................................................................................... ..... 39 

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution).......................................................................................................................................................................40 

3.5 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country: .............................................................................. 40 

Figure, 5 Comparative Productivity of Tur and Cotton in the project area, Bharuch dist., State and India Level.................................................. ............. 41 

Figure, 6 Comparative Productivity of Wheat Crop in the project area, Bharuch dist., State and India Level......................... ........................................... 42 


Chapter 4 Watershed Activities 

4.1. Scientific Planning: .............................................................................................. ........................................................... ...................................................................................... 44 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ........................... ................................................................................................................... 46 

4.2. Institution building .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..................................... 47 

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 48 

Table no. 32: SHG details.............................................................................................................................. .................................................................................................................. 53 

Figure,7 Photographs of Focussed Group Discussion ......................................................................................... .......................................................................................... 55 

4.2.3 User Group: ................................................................................................................................................................................ ........................................................................... 56 

Table no. 33: UG detail............................................................................................................................................................................................ ............................. .......................... 56 

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-I, Sankoi….................................................................................................................................................................58 

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........ 58 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs. ).................................................................................................................................... ........ 58 

Figure,8 Photographs of EPA in Sankoi Project.................................................................................................................................................. .................................................. 59 

34.2 Estimation of Drinking Water Pipe Line..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 

34.1 Estimation of Hawada......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60 

4.3.2.Watershed Development Works..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 62 

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakhs)...................................................................................................................... 64 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.).................................................................. 64 

Table no. 37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project area………................................................................................................... 66 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas...................................................................................................... 66 

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target.............................................................................................................................................67 


Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works............................................................................................................................................................68 

Table No. 40.1: Estimation of Gully Plug .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 71 

Table No. 40.2: Estimation of Stone Bunding ........................................................................................................................................................................................................72 

Table No 40.3 Estimation of Farm Bunding ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 73 

Table No 40.4: Estimation of Nala Plug .......................... ........................................................................................................................................................................................74 

Table no 40.5: Estimation of Check dam ................................................ ..................................................................................................................................................................76 

Table no 40.6: Estimation of New Pond .................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................79 

Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works.................................................................................................................... 80 

Table No. 41.1: Estimation of fruit tree Plantation ................................................................................................................. ...........................................................................83 

Table No. 41.2: Estimation of fuel wood and timber Plantation ........................................................................................... ...................................................................... 83 

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities.................................................................................................. . ............................................................................................... 84 

Table no.42.1: Estimation of Vermi Compost Unit.................................................................................................................... ......................................................................... 93 

Table no.42.2: Estimation of Animal Husbandary .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 94 

Table no.42.3: Estimation of utensils services................................................................................................................................................................................................. 95 

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas..................................................... ......................................................................................................... 96 

4.4. Capacity Building: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 98 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:.......................................................................................................................... .............................................................................. 98 

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan......................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................. 99 

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities........................................................................................................................................................ 99 

Figure,12 Photographs of Capacity Building :................................................................................................................................ ................................................................. 100 


Chapter 5 Budgeting 

Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget............................................................................................................................................................................................... 101 

Table no. 48: Budget at a glance ........................................................................................................ .......................... ......................................................................................... 102 

Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes......................................................................................................................................................... 102 

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes cost in lakh...................................................................................................................................103 

Chapter 6 Expected Outcome 

6.1 Expected Outcomes ......................................... .....................................................................................................................................................................................................107 

6.1.1 Employment .......................................................................... ..................................................... ..................................................................................... ................................. 107 

Table no. 51: Employment in Project area .................................................. ................................................................................................................ ……...............................108 

6.1.2.Migration ................................................................................................................................ .............................................................................................................................. 108 

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ......................................................... ........................................................................................................ 108 

Table no. 6.1.3: Ground water Table .................................................................................................................... ............................................................................................... 109 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)......................................................................................................... 109 

6.1.4 Drinking water ........................................................................................................ ................................................................................................... …...................................109 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water ............................................................ ................................................................................................................................................... 109 

6.1.5 Crops .................................................................................................................................. ....................................................................................................................................110 

Table no. 55 : Details of crop area and yield in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................110 

Table no. 56: Area under horticulture...................................................................................................................................................................................................................113 

6.1.7 Vegetative cover ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 113 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover ............................................................................... ................................................................................... ............................................. 113 


6.1.8 Livestock ....................................................................... ........................................................ ............................................................................................................................... 114 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas ............................................................................................................................................ ......................................114 

6.1.9 Linckages..................................................................................................................................... ..........................................................................................................................118 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... 118 

6.2 Logical Framework Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 119 

Chapter 7 Quality and Sustainability Issue 

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 122 

7.2 Plans For Project management: .................................................. ................................................................................................................................. ..................................123 

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................123 

7.4 User Charges: ................................................................................................................................................................................ ..........................................................................123 

Chapter 8 Mapping 

Figure.8.1: Map of Ground water ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................124 

Figure.8.2: Land use map ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 125 

Figure.8.3: River water body map..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................126 

Figure.8.4: Slope map ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................127 

Figure.8.5: Soil map .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................128 

Figure.8.6:Geomorphology map ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................129 

Figure.8.7: Baseline map ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................130 

Figure.8.8: Action plan map ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................131 


CHAPTER-1 

PROJECT BACKGROUND 

1.1 Project Background 

Bharuch district comes under south Gujarat zone. Total geographical area of Bharuch district is 524683 ha. There are 543 village 

panchayats and 663 villages in the district. District is drained by Narmada, Dhadhar and Kim rivers. In 2009-10 there are 5 projects in Bharuch 

district namely Sankoi, Vasana, Rajwadi, Pingot and Jantran. It covers total area is 20686.9. 

Sankoi (IWMP-1) project is located in Jhagadia taluka, Bharuch district of Gujarat. This project is a cluster approach of 6 micro-watershed 

and nine villages. Total project area of this watershed is 5223.10 ha and all area has been undertaken to be treated under Integrated Watershed 

Management Program in the 2009-2010. 

The nearest town of the project is Netrang taluka which is 15 km away from the villages is well connected to the pucca road and well 

established market. The major community of the villages is Schedule Tribe that is 100 %. The livelihood of the project area is based on 

Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and wage labour 

Table no.1: Basic project information 

Sr. 

No. 

Name of 

the 

project 

Name 

Villages 

Census code 

Gram 

Panchaya 

ts 

Taluka 

District 

Area of the 

project Ha. 

Area 

proposed to 

be treated Ha. 

Total 

project 

cost 

1 Sankoi Kharetha 210050159380000 Kharetha Jhagadi 

855.60 855.60 72.67 

Bharuch 

2 IWMP-1 Kund 210050159700000 Kharetha a 

152.60 152.60 18.31 

PIA 


3 Vandarveli 210050159390000 Kharetha 440.50 440.50 52.86 West 

4 Valpor 210050159720000 Bilatha 313.00 313.00 37.56 Forest 

5 Galiba 210050159730000 Bilatha 1007.70 1007.70 120.92 Division 

6 Fichvada 210050159710000 Kharetha 491.70 491.70 59.00 Rajpipla 

7 Rupghat 210050159930000 Bilatha 463.10 463.10 55.57 

8 Sankoi 210050159910000 Bilatha 1098.90 1098.90 131.87 

9 Varkhadi 210050159940000 Bilatha 400.00 400.00 48.00 

Bharuch District 

Sankoi Project 

Figure1, Geographic location of Sankoi project 


1.2 Need of watershed development program 

Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, 

Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water 

situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already 

developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain and Cluster approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking 

was given to Sankoi Watershed project as given in table no. 2. 

Total numbers of BPL families in this project are 1513 out of 1554, which is about 95%; hence the score is allotted 5. The percentage of 

ST population in the area is 100 %; hence the score is allotted 3. The wage labour is 9.8% in the project area; hence the score is 5. The small and 

marginal farmers are above 30%. Ground water status of the project area is very less; hence the score is allotted 2. 

Since the rainfall received is erratic, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under forest area. Due to the Moderate Slope / 

Hilly topography, runoff is very high. Primary occupation of the project area is agriculture, based on rainfall. But due to the Moderate Slope / 

Hilly land, water is not available for cultivation purpose. So the production of the area is very low; hence the score is 10. 

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 106 to the watershed. (Reference Table 2.1 below). 

Table no.2: Weightage of the project 

Project name 

Project type 

Weightage 

Sankoi IWMP-I i ii iii iv V vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total 

5 3 5 3 2 0 5 5 5 10 5 10 10 68 


Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed 

Sr. 

Maximum 

Criteria 

No. 

score 

Ranges & scores 

i Poverty index (% of poor 

to population) 

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 

% (2.5) 

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3) 

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are 

significantly lower than 

minimum wages (5) 

Actual wages are 

equal to or higher 

than minimum wages 

(0) 

iv % of small and marginal 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3) 

farmers 

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0) 

vi Moisture index/ 

DPAP/ DDP Block 

15 -66.7 & below (15) 

DDP Block 

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) 

DPAP Block 

0 to -33.2 (0) 

Non DPAP/ DDP Block 

vii Area under rain-fed 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 

agriculture 

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village 

(7.5) 

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % 

(10) 

x Productivity potential of 

the land 

15 Lands with low 

production & where 

productivity can be 

significantly enhanced 

with reasonable efforts 

(15) 

Lands with moderate 

production & where 

productivity can be 

enhanced with 

reasonable efforts 

(10) 

Partially covered (5) 

Low- less than 10 %of TGA 

(5) 

Lands with high production 

& where productivity can be 

marginally enhanced with 

reasonable efforts (5) 

% (Reject) 

Fully 

covered 

(0) 


xi 

xii 

xiii 

Contiguity to another 

watershed that has 

already been developed/ 

treated 

Cluster approach in the 

plains (more than one 

contiguous microwatersheds 

in the 

project) 

Cluster approach in the 

hills (more than one 

contiguous microwatersheds 

in the 

project) 

10 Contiguous to previously 

treated watershed & 

contiguity within the 

microwatersheds in the 

project (10) 

15 Above 6 microwatersheds 

in cluster 

(15) 

15 Above 5 microwatersheds 

in cluster 

(15) 

Contiguity within the 

microwatersheds in 

the project but non 

contiguous to 

previously treated 

watershed (5) 

4 to 6 


cluster (10) 

3 to 5 


cluster (10) 

Neither contiguous to 

previously treated 

watershed nor contiguity 

within the microwatersheds 

in the project (0) 

2 to 4 microwatersheds in 

cluster (5) 

2 to 3 microwatersheds in 

cluster (5) 

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5 

Table no.3: Watershed information 

Name of the 

project 

No. Of watersheds to be 

treated 

Sankoi IWMP-1 6 

Watershed code 

Kharetha - 5D1A6a1g 

Kund-5D1A4a1h 

Vandarveli - 5D1A6a1G 

Valpor - 5D1A6a1H 

Galiba - 5D1A6a1J 

Fichvada - 5D1A6a1H 

Rupghat - 5D1A3a1K 

Sankoi - 5D1A6a1G 

Varkhadi - 5D1A6a11 

Watershed 

regime/type/order 

Mini Watershed 


1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Sankoi project 

Jhagadia taluka is very back ward area, has been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are namely 

Indira Awas Yojana (IAY), Gujarat Forest Development Project (G.F.D.P), Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC), Mahatma Gandhi National Rural 

Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Tribal Sub Plan (TSP), Swarnajayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY) and Water and Sanitation 

Management Organisation (WASMO). Besides this, previously, one watershed project is also running in one village. 

{i} MGNREGS: Construction of check dams, deepening of village pond, farm bunding and Afforestation activity has been taken-up under 

MGNREGS. 

{ii} G.F.D.P: About five villages have covered by G.F.D.P. This works for CPR development in the village, provides employment to the people 

and conduct capacity building programs for villagers. 

{ii} Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): Toilets are constructed under TSC programme in every village at each household level. 

{iv} Swarnjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) – Provides 50% subsidy linkage with bank for Animal Husbandry and some other 

livelihood activities in the project area. 

{v} TSP: This scheme works in only tribal area. This provides lift irrigation system, fisheries, and horticulture activities in the project area. 

{vi} Indira Awas Yojana: Provides home with toilet to the BPL families. 

{vii} WASMO: All villages have covered by this scheme for drinking water facility. 

{viii} IWDP-4: This project has covered one village in the project area. 


Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: 

Sr. No. 


programme/scheme 

Sponsorin 

g agency 

Objectives of the 

programme/scheme 

Year of 

commencement 

Villages 

covered 

Estimated 

number of 

beneficiaries 

1 IAY D.R.D.A Housing facility 2005-2006 9 1273 

2 G.F.D.P. FOREST Gujarat Forest development Project 2009-2010 3 

3 TSC DRDA Sanitation campaign 2005-2006 9 1064 

4 MGNREGS DRDA Employment generation 2007-2008 9 1324 

5 TSP TSP Help tribal people 2000-2001 9 734 

6 SGSY DRDA Help to SHG & BPL families 2006 9 890 

7 WASMO Irrigation Drinking water facility 2007-2008 9 450 

255 

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: 

Sr Project 

no name 

Year 

started 


villages 

No. Of 

micro 

watershed 

Watershed 

codes 

Area 

under 

treatment 

Funding 

source 

Nodal 

agency PIA 

Total 

cost 

Rs. 

Exp. 

incurred 

up to 

start of 

IWMP 

% financial 

completion 

% physical 

completion 

1 Fichvada 2006-07 Fichvada 1 5D1A6a1H 150ha Govt DRDA T.P 900000 696953 77.43% 77.43% 


Figure-2: Geographical condition of the project area 


CHAPTER-2 

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY 

2.1. Project Implementing Agency 

The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency 

(GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are 

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under 

State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for 

Sankoi watershed Project is District Social forestry division Bharuch. 

2.2 About Project Implementing Agency, Bharuch 

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: 

PIA of the Sankoi project is Rajpipla West Forestry Division. The Deputy Conservator of Forest (DCF) is the head of division. PIA has 

dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Range Forest Officer (Nodal officer) and a watershed development team of civil engineer, 

agriculture expert and community mobiliser, Data Entry Operator, surveyor, and accountant. The objective of the PIA is supervising, planning, 

implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities at project level as per 

guidelines. This also submits the documents at the district level. 


2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA: 

Strength: 

(1) Dedicated and experienced staff and a watershed development team 

(2) Independent state level department. 

(3) Strong linkages with national, state and district level institutions, agricultural universities, KVKs and NGOs for capacity building and 

technical guidance 

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar, 

(5) Project level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee 

Opportunities: 

(1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so there can be horizontal integration and convergence 

of programmes 

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP 

(3) Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS 

Threats: 

(1) Moderate Slope / Hilly land in the project area, the activities planned to be taken up may yield limited impact 


Table no. 6: PIA: 

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA 

1 Sankoi - IWMP-1 

(i) Type of organization 

PIA (Project Implementation Agency) 

(ii Name of organization 

West Forest Division Rajpipla 

(iii) Designation & Address 

DFO Vadiya Pales Rajpipla 

(iv) Telephone (02640) 220124 

(v) Fax (02640) 220124 

(vi) E-mail 

dcfrjpw@yahoo.com 

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level: 

Sr 

no 

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification 

Experience 

year 

Job assigned 

Monthly 

remuneration 

1 C.D. Chaudhari 55 M RFO B.sc Agri. 27 

Project 

Management 

33897 

2 Patel Nilamben V. 30 F WDT. Eng. Diploma Civil 9 Technical 8000 

3 Parekh Sanjaybhai B. 35 M WDT. Agri. MRS 5 

Agri. 

Development 

8000 

4 Gavit Sushmaben B. 32 F WDT. Com. MSW 5 Com. Mobi. 8000 

5 Vankar Amrutbhai B. 41 M WDT. Surveyor Surveyor 11 Surveyor 6000 

6 Vasava Kelvin G. 22 M 

WDT. Computer 

Computer 

ITI. COPA 1 

Operator 

Operator 

5000 


CHAPTER-3 

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA 

3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology 

3.1.1 Land use pattern: 

The net geographical area of Sankoi 5223.10 ha and all has proposed for IWMP-1, out of which 56.84% area is rainfed area. Project 

covers about 67.8% area under forest cover. About 91.40% of land is under agriculture which is almost rain-fed; mainly Kharif crops are taken 

in the area. Somehow extent farmers take Rabi crops in their farms. But they don’t cultivate Zaid crops in their fields. About 9% of the total land 

is classified under wasteland out of which only 1.5 percent land is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. About 1.58% land is also comes 

under permanent pasture land. 


Table no. 8: Land use pattern: 

Sr. No. 

Names of 

villages 

Geographical 

Area of the 

village (Ha.) 

Forest Area 

(Ha.) 

Land under 

agricultural use 

(Ha.) 

Rain fed 

area (Ha.) 

Permanent 

pastures 

(Ha.) 

Wasteland (Ha.) 

Cultivable 

Noncultivable 

1 Kharetha 855.60 595.20 783.70 260.40 14.00 14.00 57.90 

2 Kund 152.60 152.60 152.60 152.60 - - - 

3 Vandarveli 440.50 330.00 392.40 110.60 24.00 24.00 24.10 

4 Valpor 313.00 105.10 276.90 208.60 6.00 6.00 30.10 

5 Galiba 1007.70 736.50 962.00 271.30 12.60 12.60 33.10 

6 Fichvada 491.70 323.60 402.80 168.10 15.00 15.00 73.90 

7 Rupghat 463.10 73.70 421.80 389.40 6.00 6.00 35.30 

8 Sankoi 1098.90 1098.90 1098.90 1098.90 - - - 

9 Varkhadi 400.00 90.80 283.00 209.20 5.20 5.20 111.80 

3.1.2 Soil and topography: 

Sankoi watershed project falls under south Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly Yellowish and Black in surface colour. The 

depth of soil is moderate to deep about 12 to 22 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low 

Nitrogen and Phosphorus. The topography of the area is Moderate Slope / Hilly ranging from 0-15% slope. 


The rainfall is good but due to the Moderate Slope / Hilly topography resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every four to five 

years in this area. The average rainfall of this area is about 988.2 mm (from past five year data). This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of 

soil every year to the streams and rivulets. 

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: 

Sr. No. 

1 

Name of the Agro-climatic 

zone covers project area 

Area in 

(ha) 

Names of the 

villages 

Major soil types 

a)Type b) Area in ha 

Topography 

855.60 Kharetha Yellowish 855.60 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

2 152.60 Kund Yellowish 152.60 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

3 440.50 Vandarveli Yellowish 440.50 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

4 313.00 Valpor Yellowish, Black 313.00 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

5 South Gujarat 1007.70 Galiba Yellowish, Black 1007.70 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

6 491.70 Fichvada Yellowish 491.70 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

7 463.10 Rupghat Yellowish 463.10 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

8 1098.90 Sankoi Yellowish 1098.90 Moderate Slope / Hilly 

9 400.00 Varkhadi Yellowish, Black 400.00 Moderate Slope / Hilly 


Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: 

Sr No Name Of Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence) 

1 Kharetha 

2 Kund 

3 Vandarveli 

4 Valpor 

5 Galiba 

6 Fichvada 

7 Rupghat 

8 Sankoi 

9 Varkhadi 

NA 

Once in Four to Five Years 

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion 

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) 

Water erosion 

a Sheet 3978.40 

b Rill 745.95 

c Gully 248.65 

d Ravenous - 

Sub-Total 4973 

Wind erosion 4973 

Total 

Run off 

(mm/ year) 

Average soil loss 

(Tonnes/ ha/ year) 

988.20 Yet not Measured 


Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) 

Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH 

Kharetha 91,167,144,137A 8.1 

Kund Forest 7.9 

Vandarveli 14,9,20,33 8.3 

Valpor 64,5,94,110 8.3 

Galiba 15,64,42,192 8.1 

Fichvada 8,46,38,45 8 

Rupghat 147,159,259,42 8.1 

Sankoi 15, Forest 8.2 

Varkhadi 29,44,16,35 8.1 

Type of Salinity 

(Inherent/Ingress) 

Ingress (Bhasmik) 

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions 

Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons 

Kharetha 

Kund 

Vandarveli 

Valpor 

Galiba 

Fichvada 

Rupghat 

Sankoi 

Varkhadi 

NA 


Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: 

Name of project 

Sankoi-IWMP-1 

Village Name 

Kharetha 

Kund 

Vandarveli 

Valpor 

Galiba 

Fichvada 

Rupghat 

Sankoi 

Varkhadi 

Average rainfall- last 

5 years 

Average temperature ( o C) 

Summer 

Winter 

Max Min Max Min 

988.20 44 32 37 22 

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief 

Village Name Elevation (mt) Slope range (%) Major streams 

Kharetha 210 

Kund 207 

Vandarveli 200 

Valpor 196 

Galiba 196 

0-15% Karjan River 

Fichvada 231 

Rupghat 146 

Sankoi 203 

Varkhadi 156 


3.1.3 Land and Agriculture: 

Due to Moderate Slope / Hilly soil and lack of surface water sources, ground water has sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking 

purpose in every village. The average land holding of the project is about 1.25 ha ranging from 1 to 4 ha village to village. Lack of irrigation 

sources force the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood or work as a wage labour in another farmer’s field. This affects 

directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops in the project area cultivated by the farmers are Tur and Cotton in kharif season. 

Some of the farmers take wheat crop in Rabi season if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as bore in some villages help them 

to take up a Rabi crop of wheat in the residual moisture. But other soil and water conservation structures like farm bunding, nala plug, Check 

dam, recharge channel, gully plug, gabion structure and new pond will also help the farmers to taken up other crops like sugarcane, rice, 

irrigated wheat, vegetables and Zaid crops also. 

Table no. 14: Land ownership details 

Sr No 

Village 

Total owned land 

Gen OBC SC ST 

1 Kharetha 96 

2 Kund 0 

3 Vandarveli 31 

4 Valpor 79 

5 Galiba 124 

6 Fichvada 39 

7 Rupghat 65 

8 Sankoi 2 

9 Varkhadi 2 96 

HHs giving 

land on 

lease 

NA 

HHs taking 

land on 

lease 


Table no. 15: Agriculture 

Sr. No. 

Village 

Net sown area (Ha) 

One time Two times Three times 

1 Kharetha 188.48 Nil 

2 Kund 39.83 Nil 

3 Vandarveli 42.48 20.00 

4 Valpor 165.10 6.75 

5 Galiba 219.00 8.00 

NA 

6 Fichvada 79.24 Nil 

7 Rupghat 341.00 7.00 

8 Sankoi 73.61 Nil 

9 Varkhadi 190.15 2.00 

Table no. 16: Irrigation 

Sr no 

Village 

Well / Bore 

Availability months Net area (Ha) Gross area (Ha) 

1 Kharetha 0 0 0 

2 Kund 0 0 0 

3 Vandarveli 6 20 20 

4 Valpor 7 6.75 6.75 

5 Galiba 7 8 8 

6 Fichvada 0 0 0 

7 Rupghat 8 7 7 

8 Sankoi 0 0 0 

9 Varkhadi 7 2 2 


Table no. 17: Crop details: 

Village 

Kharif (Monsoon) 

Tur Cotton Rice 

Area 

(Ha) 

Production 

(Kg) 

Productivity 

(Kg/Ha) 

Area 

(Ha) 

Production 

(Kg) 

Productivity 

(Kg/Ha) 

Area 

(Ha) 

Production 

(Kg) 

1 Kharetha 91 36592 400 69 27600 400 28 9800 350 

2 Kund 23 9200 400 11 4400 400 6 2100 350 

3 Vandarveli 27 12150 450 9 4050 450 7 2800 400 

4 Valpor 87 43500 500 48 21600 450 31 12400 400 

5 Galiba 104 46800 450 78 35100 450 37 15725 425 

6 Fichvada 38 15200 400 26 10400 400 15 6000 400 

7 Rupghat 167 83500 500 105 52500 500 69 31050 450 

8 Sankoi 35 14000 400 24 10800 450 14 5600 400 

9 Varkhadi 109 49050 450 56 22400 400 25 10625 425 

Total 681 309992 455 426 188850 443 232 96100 415 

Sr. 

No. 

Productivity 

(Kg/Ha) 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Juvar 

Rabi (Winter) 

Wheat 

Area (Ha) Production (Kg) Productivity (Kg/Ha) Area (Ha) Production (Kg) Productivity (Kg/Ha) 

1 Kharetha 0 0 0 0 0 0 

2 Kund 0 0 0 0 0 0 

3 Vandarveli 15 5250 350 5 17.5 3.5 

4 Valpor 5 2000 400 1.75 612.5 350 

5 Galiba 6 2400 400 2 600 300 

6 Fichvada 0 0 0 0 0 0 

7 Rupghat 6 240 400 1 400 400 

8 Sankoi 0 0 0 0 0 0 

9 Varkhadi 1.5 600 400 0.5 150 300 

Total 33.5 12650 377.6 10.25 1780 173.65 


Figure-3: Biophysical survey of the villages 


3.1.4 Livestock: 

In the Sankoi project, there are 705 cows, 448 buffaloes, 707 goats, 545 bullocks and 610 hens. In maximum villages poultry is the main 

source of livelihood and in some villages cows and buffaloes are the source of income. Mainly cows and buffaloes are the local breed. Lack of 

surface water, fodder and pasture availability for the animals has reduced the numbers in the project area. This leads to heavy migration of the 

villagers to other parts of the state. Milk production is very low in the project area. There is no dairy cooperative in any village. Average milk of 

cow is 1-1.5 lit/day and for buffalo is 2-3 lit/day. 

Table no. 18: Livestock 

Sr. No. 

Village 

No 

Buffalo 

Milk 

(lit/day) 

No 

Cow 

Milk 

(lit/day) 

Total Milk 

(Buffalo+Cow) 

Milk (lit/day) 

No 

Goat Bullock Hen 

Milk 

(lit/day) 

1 Kharetha 45 135 185 370 505 150 0 55 27 

2 Kund 20 60 40 80 140 35 0 20 25 

3 Vandarveli 25 75 35 70 145 55 0 40 70 

4 Valpor 90 270 80 160 430 62 0 41 65 

5 Galiba 106 318 120 240 558 115 0 71 100 

6 Fichvada 53 159 45 90 249 80 0 50 85 

7 Rupghat 34 102 50 100 202 50 0 80 102 

8 Sankoi 30 90 60 120 210 70 0 50 79 

9 Varkhadi 45 135 90 180 315 90 0 138 57 


3.1.5 Drinking water: 

Sources of drinking water in the project area are open well and pump. These provide drinking water facilities to the villagers up to 9-10 

month regularly and remaining time irregularly. So these remaining months they face the problem of drinking water. The quality of the water is 

contaminated also. The ground water table of the villages are also very low about 40-45mt. 

Table no. 19: Drinking water 

Sr. No. Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality 

1 Kharetha 

2 Kund 

3 Vandarveli 

4 Valpor 

5 Galiba 

6 Fichvada 

7 Rupghat 

8 Sankoi 

9 Varkhadi 

40 to 45 Open Well, Handpump 

9 month regular, 

3 month irregular 

Contaminated 

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources 

Sr. 

No 

. 


project 

CPR Particulars 

Pvt. 

persons 

Total Area (ha) 

Area owned/ In possession of 

Govt. (specify 

deptt.) 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. Specify) 

Area available for treatment (ha) 

Pvt. 

persons 

Govt. (sp. 

deptt.) 

PRI 

Any other 

(Pl. Specify) 

1 Kharetha 

Wasteland/ degraded land 25.1 

Pastures 12.08 21.53 

Forest 595.08 


2 Kund 

3 Vanderveli 

4 Valpor 

5 Galiba 

6 Fichwada 

7 Rupghat 

8 Sankoi 

9 Varkhadi 

Total 632.26 21.53 

Forest 152.6 8.8 

Total 152.6 8.82 


Pastures 24.01 7.85 

Forest 329.96 

Total 358.41 7.85 

Pastures 5.95 2 

Forest 105.14 

Smashan 1.03 

Total 112.12 2 



Forest 731.12 15.85 

Dhor Dabbo 0.85 

Total 756.6 25.85 

Wasteland/ degraded land 34.44 10.85 


Forest 330.55 

Total 389.61 22.85 


Forest 73.68 4.35 

Total 78.86 9.35 


Forest 114.33 

Total 1088.32 13.73 


Pastures 7.02 

Forest 90.81 

Total 117.39 7.84 


3.2. Socio-Economic Profile 

3.2.1 Demographic Status: 

Sankoi project covers 9 villages in Jhagadia taluka. It covers 1554 household with 7778 population (as per base-line survey) out of which 

3923 are male and 3855 are female. Sex ratio of the area is 982 female to 1000 male. This ratio varies from village to village from 910 to 1015. 

In the project area only Schedule Tribe are there. The average family size of the villages is 4. There are 1513 BPL families in the project area. The 

literacy rate of the area is 42.47%, out of which male literacy rate is 28.0% and female literacy rate is 39.09%. This is very low due to lack of 

awareness in villagers. High school is far away from the villages and transport facility is also very bad in the villages so people can’t go to the 

high school. Majority of population is involved as a wage labour in agriculture and animal husbandry. 

Table no. 21: Demographic information 

Sr. 

No. 

Village Population SC ST 

1 Kharetha 1322 655 667 

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female % 

1322 655 667 100 

2 Kund 189 99 90 189 99 90 100 

3 Vandarveli 251 125 126 251 125 126 100 

4 Valpor 880 443 437 880 443 437 100 

5 Galiba 1371 691 680 NA 

1371 691 680 100 

6 Fichvada 578 292 286 578 292 286 100 

7 Rupghat 589 283 306 589 283 306 100 

8 Sankoi 1819 936 883 1819 936 883 100 

9 Varkhadi 779 399 380 779 399 380 100 


Table no. 22: Literacy rate 

Sr. No. 

Village 

Total 

Population 

Literacy 

Total % Male % Female % 

1 Kharetha 1322 505 38 365 28 140 11 

2 Kund 189 57 30 45 24 12 6 

3 Vandarveli 251 98 39 57 23 41 16 

4 Valpor 880 328 37 223 25 105 12 

5 Galiba 1371 542 40 360 26 182 13 

6 Fichvada 578 127 22 93 16 34 6 

7 Rupghat 589 239 41 157 27 82 14 

8 Sankoi 1819 1144 63 684 38 460 25 

9 Varkhadi 779 264 34 194 25 70 9 

3.2.2 Migration Pattern: 

Migration percentage of the project area is 9 to 10%. People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Surat and 

Rajkot as daily wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of landholding, fodder availability and grazing land for smaller 

ruminant force these people to migrate to other places. 


Table no. 23: Migration details 

Migration Migration by months Main 

Sr. 

Total 

Village 

reason for 

No. 

population 

Up to 3 3-6 More than 

Total Male Female 

months months 6 months migration 

1 Kharetha 1322 135 88 47 135 

2 Kund 189 15 10 5 15 

3 Vandarveli 251 25 18 7 25 

4 Valpor 880 90 78 12 90 

Lack of 

5 Galiba 1371 135 95 40 135 NA NA Employme 

6 Fichvada 578 55 44 11 55 

nt 

7 Rupghat 589 60 47 13 60 

8 Sankoi 1819 110 73 37 110 

9 Varkhadi 779 75 46 29 75 

Income 

(Rs.)during 

migration / month 

3000to4000 

Table no. 24: Poverty 

Sr. No. 

Village 

Total 

Household 

BPL 

0-16 16-20 Total 

Total Land less HH 

% of land less HH 

1 Kharetha 247 311 23 334 13 5 

2 Kund 38 50 0 50 2 5 

3 Vandarveli 59 55 4 59 3 5 

4 Valpor 191 193 27 220 9 5 

5 Galiba 273 216 102 318 12 4 

6 Fichvada 103 146 14 160 6 6 

7 Rupghat 126 68 68 136 5 4 

8 Sankoi 332 256 129 385 16 5 

9 Varkhadi 185 218 54 272 9 5 


3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities: 

Majority of villages in the project is connected with pucca road. Only one village Varkhadi doesn’t have pucca road. There is Lower 

primary school in every village but no upper primary and high school in the villages. People go to the Netrang taluka for their upper education 

which is 15 km away from the villages. Villages do not have any Primary Health Centre, bank and Post office for which villagers have to go to 

Netrang taluka which is 15 Km. away from the villages. People of these villages go the nearest taluka place for selling and buying of the products. 

No villages have milk collection centre and milk cooperative. About 67-70% households have electrical facility and 40-45% families have latrine 

facility. 

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure 

Sr. 

No 

. 

Village 

Pucca 

road to 

the 

village 

(Y/N) 

Schools 

LP UP HS 

Colleges 

(No.) 

Post Office 

(Distance) 

Banks 

(No.) 

Distanc 

e from 

nearest 

market 

yard 

Milk 

collectio 

n centre 

(No.) 

Milk 

cooperati 

ve (No.) 

Other 

cooperativ 

es / CBIs 

(Number) 

1 Kharetha Y Y N N N N Y 13 N N N N 

2 Kund Y Y N N N N N 12 N N N N 

3 Vandarveli Y Y N N N N N 11 N N N N 

4 Valpor Y Y N N N N N 15 N N N N 

5 Galiba Y Y N N N N N 14 N N N N 

6 Fichvada N Y N N N N N 20 N N N N 

7 Rupghat Y Y N N N N N 17 N N N N 

8 Sankoi Y Y N N N N N 10 N N N N 

9 Varkhadi N Y N N N N N 17 N N N N 

Any 

other 

institu 

tion 


Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

HHs with 

electricity 

HHs 

with 

safety 

latrines 

Land 

line 

HHs with 

phones 

Mobile 

HHs with vehicle 

2- 

wheeler 

4- 

wheeler 

HHs with 

TV set 

HHs with 

cooking 

gas 

HHs with 

Drinking 

water 

HHs 

with 

freedge 

1 Kharetha 113 110 7 4 7 0 14 N 0 1 

2 Kund 30 12 1 3 2 0 3 N 0 2 

3 Vandarveli 40 23 2 4 4 1 5 N 0 0 

4 Valpor 187 85 4 13 10 1 10 N 0 2 

5 Galiba 185 125 13 8 14 0 33 N 0 7 

6 Fichvada 64 49 20 15 4 0 4 N 0 1 

7 Rupghat 92 55 13 7 8 0 3 N 0 0 

8 Sankoi 162 142 43 27 40 2 18 N 0 2 

9 Varkhadi 179 89 3 15 12 0 10 N 0 3 


Figure 4, PRA in Sankoi Project 


3.3. Livelihood pattern: 

The villagers earn their livelihood from agriculture and animal husbandry and during summer seasons they migrate for daily wage 

labourers in Rajkot, Ankleshwar and Surat. 

Table no. 27: Income 

Sr. No. Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total 

1 Kharetha 4935 830 2100 2075 9940 

2 Kund 4103 792 2075 1980 8950 

3 Vandarveli 5109 726 2050 1815 9700 

4 Valpor 6159 418 2200 1043 9820 

5 Galiba 5813 442 2070 1105 9430 

6 Fichvada 4930 660 2025 1650 9265 

7 Rupghat 5679 690 2200 1724 10293 

8 Sankoi 5738 636 2195 1589 10158 

9 Varkhadi 6153 390 2180 975 9698 

3.4 Dependence on forest/Common Property Resource 

Forest is covered in all villages. Villagers use forest for fuel and fodder purpose. 

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR 

Sr. No. 

Village 

Fuel Other Total 

% sells Income % sells Income income 

1 Kharetha 12 1200 9 875 2075 

2 Kund 12 1080 10 900 1980 

3 Vandarveli 11 1025 8 790 1815 

4 Valpor 11 1043 0 0 1043 

5 Galiba 12 1105 0 0 1105 

6 Fichvada 11 1025 7 625 1650 

7 Rupghat 10 1019 7 705 1724 

8 Sankoi 11 1134 4 455 1589 

9 Varkhadi 10 975 0 0 975 


Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) 

Sr. 

No. 

Village 

Total 

workforce 

Agriculture 

Animal 

husbandry (AH) 

Agriculture + 

AH 

Casual 

labour 

Services Handicraft Others 

1 Kharetha 660 403 79 99 66 7 0 7 

2 Kund 95 58 11 14 10 1 0 1 

3 Vandarveli 125 76 15 19 13 1 0 1 

4 Valpor 441 269 53 66 44 4 0 4 

5 Galiba 687 419 82 103 69 7 0 7 

6 Fichvada 290 177 35 44 29 3 0 3 

7 Rupghat 292 168 35 44 29 3 10 3 

8 Sankoi 915 558 110 137 92 9 0 9 

9 Varkhadi 391 231 47 59 39 4 8 4 

3.5. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World 

“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per 

hectare of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under 

that crop.” 

Data are made available by the Baseline survey (for all sixteen villages), Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006 (For Gujarat 

and India), and Final district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Bharuch). The results indicate that Sankoi project has very low productivity 

compared to world, India, Gujarat and Bharuch. The productivity is low not only because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the 

skills to manage their crop but also due lack to of source of irrigation. 


In Sankoi project people grow crops are Tur and Cotton in Kharif season. And if irrigation facility is good and rainfall is good, they take 

Rabi crops like Wheat and Rabi sorghum. The main crop of the project area is Tur. The productivity of Tur in India is 678 kg/ha. In Gujarat state 

the productivity of this is 989 kg/ ha. In Bharuch district this is 725 kg/ha. In the project area out of 5223.10 ha, Tur is grown in only 681 ha 

area with the production of 309.99 tonne. So the productivity of the area is 455 kg/ha. This is very low with respective to district, state as well 

as national level. 

Again this is the same condition with cotton. The productivity of Cotton in India is 466 kg/ha. In Gujarat state the productivity of this is 

625 kg/ ha. In Bharuch district this is 510 kg/ha. In the project area Cotton is grown in only 426 ha area with the production of 188.85 tonne 

and the productivity of the area is 443 kg/ha. 

The productivity of Wheat in India is 2891 kg/ha. In Gujarat state the productivity of this is 2400 kg/ ha. In Bharuch district this is 

2500kg/ha. In the project area Wheat is grown in only 10.25 ha area with the production of 1.78 tonne and the productivity of the area is 173.65 

kg/ha. 

Figure-5 

Comparative productivity of Tur and Cotton crop in project area, Bharuch district, state and India level 


Figure-6 

Comparative productivity of Wheat crop in project area, Bharuch district, state and India level 

Sankoi project has low productivity because of following reason: 

1 Traditional Farming Method: 

In Sankoi project farmers use traditional farming. They don’t use new technology and high yield varieties of crop. Farmers don’t use 

proper FYM, Vermi-compost in their farm. That leads to low yield in their farm. 

2 Soil erosion: 

Due to the Moderate Slope / Hilly land erosion of the soil is very high in the project area. So top layer of the soil/ fertile soil is degraded. 


3 Soil fertility very low: 

In Sankoi project fertility of the soil is very low. Soil is less nutritive in nitrogen and phosphorus. 

4 No irrigation facilities: 

Due to the Moderate Slope / Hilly soil, run off is very off. Water conservation structures are very less in Sankoi project. So irrigation 

facility is very low in the project area. Farmers use only rainfed farming in their field. 

5 Lack of finance for farmer 

In Sankoi project above 95% of the villagers are BPL. So they can’t purchase High yielding varieties seeds and machinery in their field. 

And they are unable in adopting new farming technology in the field. 

6 Lack of storage, marketing and transport facility: 

Farmers use their products for domestic purpose and remaining they sell in the nearest market and get less amount of money. They have 

no storage facility and transport facility so that they could sell their products in good market and get good return. 


CHAPTER-4 

WATERSHED ACTIVITY 

Watershed Activities 

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. 

These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high 

incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed 

development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development. 

4.1. Scientific Planning: 

i) Cluster Approach 

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Sankoi project 

consists of 6 microwatersheds. Further this watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely Vasana, Rajwadi, 

Pingot, Jantran Projects this gives an element of continuation of the programme. 

ii) 

Base line Survey 

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has conducted. This acts a benchmark for any 

intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved 

household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey includes a 

detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic 

profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, net consumption rate in the village, 

average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits. 


Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, well in the 

area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field. 

iii) 

Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) 

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the 

programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge 

(ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and postwithdrawal 

activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and 

season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put 

the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local 

vegetations (apt for afforestation), Fodders crops, various institutions and their significance in the life of the farmers. Daily routine activity 

helps the daily chart or life span of the villagers. 

iv) 

Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning 

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development. 

a) Prioritization 

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geomorphological, 

Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given 

proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas. 


) Planning 

A action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope percent, soil 

Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS) was used to 

identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical 

interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures. 

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects 

Scientific criteria/ inputs used 

Whether scientific criteria was used 

(A) Planning 

Cluster approach 

yes 

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute 

yes 

Baseline survey 

yes 

Hydro-geological survey 

yes 

Contour mapping 

yes 

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) 

yes 

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover 

Ridge to Valley treatment 

yes 

Online IT connectivity between 

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP yes 

(2) DRDA and SLNA yes 

(3) SLNA and DoLR yes 

Availability of GIS layers 

1. Cadastral map yes 

2. Village boundaries yes 

3. Drainage yes 

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) yes 

5. Land use yes 

6. Ground water status yes 

7. Watershed boundaries yes 


8. Activity yes 

Crop simulation models # 

No 

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil 

nutrient analysis 

No 

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# 

No 

(B) Inputs 

1. Bio-pesticides yes 

2. Organic manures yes 

3. Vermicompost yes 

4. Bio-fertilizer yes 

5. Water saving devices yes 

6. Mechanized tools/ implements yes 

7. Bio-fencing yes 

8. Nutrient budgeting yes 

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers no 

Any other (please specify) 

4.2. Institution building 

i) Watershed Committee (WC) 

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This 

committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee 

with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in each village of the Sankoi project. 

Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT as well as PIA. The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play 

during and after the project implementation period.Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details 


Sl. 

No 

. 


Village 

Names of WCs 

Date of 

Registrati 

on as a 

Society 

(dd/mm/ 

yyyy) 

M/ 

F 

SC ST SF MF LF 

Designation 

Landless 

UG SHG GP 

1 

Vasava Savilalbhai Khalpabhai 

President M ST √ 

2 Vasava Devabhai Lakadiya Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Rameshbhai Muljibhai Member M ST √ 

4 Vasava Ramanbhai Rayajibhai Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Ramanbhai G. Member M ST √ 

Under 

6 Kharetha Vasava Gulabbhai D. Member M ST 

Progress 

7 C. D. Chaudhari RFO M ST 

√ 

8 Vasava Mangiben Sunilbhai Member F ST √ 

9 Vasava Vanitaben S. Member F ST √ 

10 Vasava Radhaben Bhimabhai Member F ST √ 

11 Patel Nilamben Valjibhai WDT. Eng. F 

Any 

other 

1 

Vasava Kanubhai Mathurbhai 


2 Vasava Pohana Buchiyabhai Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Somabhai Mathurbhai Member M ST √ 

4 Vasava Chaganbhai Madviya Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Bachubhai Bavabhai Member M ST √ 

Under 

6 Kund Vasava Govindbhai Namubhai Member M ST √ 

Progress 


8 Vasava Champaben Ramesh Member F ST √ 

9 Vasava Amaratben Kanubhai Member F ST √ 

10 Vasava Jitaliben Chunilalbhai Member F ST √ 



1 

Vasava Narapatbhai 

Bhisubhai 


2 Vasava Ramesh Dalsukhbhai Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Somabhai Bachubhai Member M ST √ 

4 Vasava Gurajibhai Zinabhai Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Madhusing Rupsing 

Under 

Member M ST √ 

Vandarveli 

6 Vasava Manorbhai Jelamsang Progress Member M ST √ 


8 Vasava Ganpatbhai Sakiya Member M ST √ 

9 Vasava Gitaben Ishwarbhai Member F ST √ 

10 Vasava Vanitaben Somabhai Member F ST √ 


1 

Vasava Harshad Bhupatsing 


2 Vasava Madhavsing N. Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Manubhai Maljibhai Member M ST √ 

4 Vasava Babubhai Saradha Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Gitaben Madhavbhai Member F ST √ 

Under 

6 Valpor Vasava Sarasvatiben Rajesh Progress Member F ST √ 


8 Vasava Kapilaben Sursing Member F ST √ 

9 Vasava Rushatbhai Puniya Member M ST √ 

10 Vasava Chiman Tuliyabhai Member M ST √ 



1 

Vasava Vandanbhai Arunbhai 


2 Vasava Ramilaben Raghubhai Member F ST √ 

3 Vasava Jivantiben Ranjibhai Member F ST √ 

4 Vasava Shaileshbhai Druvsing Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Bhudhdhilal Sursing Member M ST √ 

6 Vasava Nayanaben Somabhai Under Member F ST √ 

Galiba 

7 C. D. Chaudhari Progress RFO M ST 

8 Vasava Pushapaben D. Member F ST √ 

9 Vasava Somabhai Zaverbhai Member M ST √ 

10 Vasava BhupendraFatesing Member M ST √ 

11 Vasava Vinubhai Sureshbhai Member M ST √ 


1 

Vasava Mohanbhai Parsing 


2 Vasava Rupajibhai Tetiyabhai Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Sukavantiben Natavar Member F ST √ 

4 Vasava Ravitaben Chhatrasing Member F ST √ 

5 Vasava Gamiyabhai Hirabhai Member M ST √ 

6 Vasava Khansing Somabhai Under Member M ST √ 

Fichavada 


8 Vasava Harising Rayajibhai Member M ST √ 

9 Vasava Bhigajibhai Devajibhai Member M ST √ 

10 Vasava Somabhai Karamsing Member M ST √ 

11 Vasava Bhartiben Gopalbhai Member F ST √ 



1 

Vasava Ishwarbhai Kalidas 


2 Vasava MansangOliyabhai Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Rajeshbhai Ramdas Member M ST √ 

4 Vasava Dilipbhai Hirabhai Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Govindbhai Biniyabhai Member M ST √ 

6 Vasava Amarsing Navalbhai Under Member M ST √ 

Rupghat 


8 Vasava Sukamaben Ramesh Member F ST √ 

9 Vasava Lalitaben Devsang Member F ST √ 

10 Vasava Vanitaben Mohanbhai Member F ST √ 

11 Vasava Manjulaben Subhash Member F ST √ 


1 

Vasava Sukhadevbhai Venilal 


2 Vasava Nandlalbhai Bhulabhai Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Chandrasing Ratilal Member M ST √ 

4 Vasava Narendra Dineshbhai Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Chhaganbhai Namala Member M ST √ 

Under 

6 Sankoi Vasava Minaben Ganpatbhai 

Progress 

Member F ST √ 


8 Vasava Jyostnaben Vijaybhai Member F ST √ 

9 Vasava Ramilaben Raghubhai Member F ST √ 

10 Vasava Bahadurbhai Lallubhai Member M ST √ 



1 

Vasava Pratapbhai Raniyabhai 


2 Vasava Dungarji Ramjibhai Member M ST √ 

3 Vasava Narsing Kotaniyabhai Member M ST √ 

4 Vasava Fatesing Vadagiyabhai Member M ST √ 

5 Vasava Prabhatbhai Gavaliya Member M ST √ 

Under 

6 Varkhadi Vasava Jamalsing Navalbhai Member M ST 

Progress 


√ 

8 Vasava Savitaben Kelvinbhai Member F ST √ 

9 Vasava Deviben Gambhirbhai Member F ST √ 

10 Vasava Ukadiben devajibhai Member F ST √ 


ii ) Self Help Group 

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group 

initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. 

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with 

the following observations: 

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution. 

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders 

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people 

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking. 

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like AKRSP, it was planned to have some capacity building 

training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment. 


Table no. 32: SHG detail 

Sr. 

No. 


village 

With only 

Men 

Total no. of registered SHGs 

With only 

Women 

With 

both 

1 Kharatha 1 5 - 6 

2 Kund 1 2 - 3 

3 Vanderveli 3 - 3 

4 Valpor 0 5 - 5 

5 Galiba 1 8 - 9 

No. of members 

No. of ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in 

each category 

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

Landless 9 48 57 9 48 57 9 7 16 

SF 3 15 18 3 15 18 

MF 

LF 

Total 12 63 75 12 63 75 9 7 16 

Landless 11 21 32 11 21 32 11 21 32 

SF 0 0 0 0 

MF 

LF 

Total 11 21 32 11 21 32 11 21 32 

Landless 24 24 0 24 24 16 16 

SF 7 7 0 7 7 

MF 

LF 

Total 0 31 31 0 31 31 0 16 16 

Landless 32 32 0 32 32 24 24 

SF 21 21 0 21 21 

MF 

LF 

Total 0 53 53 0 53 53 0 24 24 

Landless 5 23 28 5 23 28 5 23 28 

SF 6 62 68 6 62 68 

MF 

LF 

Total 11 85 96 11 85 96 5 23 28 


6 Fichwada 1 6 - 7 

7 Rupghat 2 3 - 5 

8 Sankoi 5 16 - 21 

9 Varkhadi 1 2 0 3 

Landless 7 17 24 7 17 24 11 16 27 

SF 4 32 36 4 32 36 

MF 

LF 

Total 11 49 60 11 49 60 11 16 27 

Landless 12 5 17 12 5 17 11 25 36 

SF 10 28 38 10 28 38 

MF 

LF 

Total 22 33 55 22 33 55 11 25 36 

Landless 55 171 226 55 171 226 55 102 157 

SF 0 0 0 0 

MF 

LF 

Total 55 171 226 55 171 226 55 102 157 

Landless 11 22 33 11 22 33 11 17 28 

SF 0 0 0 0 

MF 

LF 

Total 11 22 33 11 22 33 11 17 28 


Figure 7 Focused Group Discussions with Villagers. 


4.2.3 User Group: 

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect 

user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. 

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit. 

Table no. 33: UG details 

Sr. Name of the 

Total no. of UGs 

No. of members 

No. of ST in each 

category 

No. of BPL in each 

category 

No. village Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total 

(i)Landless 

1 Kharetha 6 6 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 37 37 37 0 37 4 4 

(iii) MF 5 5 5 5 

Total 42 0 42 42 0 42 4 0 4 

2 Kund 2 2 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 14 14 14 0 14 14 14 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 

Total 14 0 14 14 0 14 14 0 14 

3 Vanderveli 3 1 4 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 28 1 29 28 1 29 3 3 

(iii) MF 3 3 3 3 

Total 31 1 32 31 1 32 3 0 3 

4 Valpor 1 1 2 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 12 2 14 12 2 14 2 2 

(iii) MF 0 0 0 

Total 12 2 14 12 2 14 2 0 2 


5 Galiba 10 1 11 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 73 1 74 73 1 74 7 7 

(iii) MF 3 3 3 3 

Total 76 1 77 76 1 77 7 0 7 

6 Fichwada 3 1 4 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 27 1 28 27 1 28 1 1 

(iii) MF 0 0 

Total 27 1 28 27 1 28 1 0 1 

7 Rupghat 2 0 2 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 13 0 13 13 0 13 2 2 

(iii) MF 3 3 3 3 

Total 16 0 16 16 0 16 2 0 2 

8 Sankoi 2 0 2 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 16 0 16 16 0 16 5 5 

(iii) MF 0 0 

Total 16 0 16 16 0 16 5 0 5 

9 Varkhadi 2 0 2 

(i)Landless 

(iv) LF 

(ii) SF 13 1 14 13 1 14 2 2 

(iii) MF 0 0 

Total 13 1 14 13 1 14 2 0 2 


4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Sankoi 

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) 

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project; 

generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with 

village people in Gram Sabha regarding the EPA activity. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important, which revive the 

common natural resources. EPA was selected on the basis of Drinking water problem, Repairing of structures for irrigation water facilities and 

for animal drinking problem. It was also taken into priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability 

of activities. Different types of activities like check dam repairing, bore well, hawada, filter plant and sintax tank for drinking water in school, 

well repairing, pipelines, new ponds have been taken up in EPA. 

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Sl. 

No. 


Villages 

Amount 

earmarked 

for EPA (lakh) 

Entry Point Activities planned 

Estimated 

cost (lakh) 

Conv. 

(lakh) 

Depart. of 

conv. 

1 Kharetha 2.91 Check dam Repairing, Bore well and Hawada 3.81 0.90 WASMO 

2 Kund 0.73 Hawada, Filter plant and Sintex tank 1.23 0.50 WASMO 

3 Vandarveli 2.11 Well Repairing, Hawada 2.11 

4 Valpor 1.50 Pipeline, Filter plant and Sintex tank 2.00 0.50 WASMO 

5 Galiba 4.84 Pond deepning ,outlet, Bore well and Hawada repairing 5.69 0.85 WASMO 

6 Fichvada 2.36 New Pond, Filter plant and Sintex tank 2.86 0.50 WASMO 

7 Rupghat 2.22 Check dam Repairing, Filter plant and Sintex tank 2.72 0.50 WASMO 

8 Shankoi 5.27 Protection wall-4 No. on main Road nala 5.27 

9 Varkhadi 1.92 Pipeline, Motor, borewell, , Filter plant and Sintex tank 3.25 0.50, 0.83 WASMO, TASP 

Total 23.86 28.94 5.08 



Figure 8, Activity of Specified by Villager for Entry Point (EPA) 

34.2Estimation of Drinking water pipe line at village Valpor Entry point Activity 

No Particulars No L B H Qty Rate Per Amount 

1 Excavation 1 1 0.45 0.60 0.27 69.60 18.79 

2 Pipe line 6 kg/Sq.cm 1 1 1.00 275.00 275.00 

3 Sand filling in bed 1 1 0.45 0.10 0.05 500.00 22.50 

316.29 

4 10 % of cost for bend ,at,Valve etc. 31.63 

Total cost per m. 347.92 

Total cost :- 300 347.92 104376.00 

SAY :- 104300.00 

Estimation of Hawada at village Kund 

NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY Rate per Amount 

1 Excavation for foundation 

* Foundation 1 8.30 5.00 0.25 10.38 10.38 69.6 Cu.m 722.10 

2 Cement concrete in 1:4:8 

1 8.30 5.00 0.25 10.38 10.38 2270.9 Cu.m 23560.59 

3 Cement concrete in 1:2:4 

* Bottom Layer 1 8.30 5.00 0.15 6.23 

* Long Vertical wall O/o 2 5.30 0.15 0.75 1.19 

* Short vertical wall I/I 2 1.20 0.15 0.75 0.27 7.69 3214.50 Cu.m 24711.47 

4 Providing cement plaster in 20mm tk 

* Bottom 1 8.30 5.00 41.50 


* Long vertical wall O/o 2 5.30 0.75 7.95 

* Short vertical wall O/o 2 1.50 0.75 2.25 

* Long vertical wall I/I 2 5.00 0.75 7.50 

* Short vertical wall I/I 2 1.20 0.75 1.80 

5 Mild Steel bars 

* Long wall top 2 5.30 0.15 1.59 

* Short wall top 2 1.20 0.15 0.36 62.95 113.3 Sq.m 7132.24 

( S.O.R.P.No. 62 Sr.No. 5 ) 

* Bottom base steel ( both side ) 

* 8 mm dia. 0.15m c/c 

Nos=8.30/0.15+1=56.33 say 56 nos 56 X 5.00 X 0.395 110.60 

* 8 mm dia. 0.15m c/c 

Nos=5.00/0.15+1=34.33 say 34 nos 34 X 8.30 X 0.395 111.47 

* Vertical Bars 

* long wall- 8mm dia. Bars o.15 m c/c 

Nos=5.15/0.15+1=35.33 say 35 nos 2 X 35 X 0.75 X 0.62 32.55 

* Short wall 

Nos=1.35/0.15+1=10 nos 2 X 10 X 0.75 X 0.62 9.30 

* Distribution bars 

* L=5.15+5.15+1.35+1.35=13.00m 

Nos=0.75/0.15+1=6 nos. 

6 Name Plate 1 Nos. 

2 X 6.00 X 13.00 X 0.75 X 

0.395 46.22 310.13 43 Kg 13335.76 

1 nos 1 nos 1200 Nos 1200.00 

TOTAL AMOUNT :- 70662.15 


4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: 

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach 

should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is allotted for this work. 

Ridge Area Treatment Plans: 

It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and forest region in 

Sankoi watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Sankoi watershed following structure are been Proposed after interaction among Gram sabha, 

watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO), Project Manager and other field staff of project. 

1. Check dam 

2. Contour trench 

3. Gully plug 

4. Stone bunding 

5. Farm bunding 

1. Check dams 

Check Dam is a structure constructed using cement and concrete across the river of comparatively wider water channel. This structure is 

preferred where the height of both the banks of river is considerably high and the width of river channel or stream is less. 

Advantages of check dams 

The advantages of check dams are that they store surface water for use both during and after the monsoon. They help in ground water 

recharge of the area. Recharge of water helps in raising the water table in the area. Avaiability of water ensures the increase of agricultural yield 

by multi-cropping. 


2. Contour trench 

These trenches act as trap for the water and minimise soil erosion. The trenches do not need to be very large to be effective. 

3. Gully plug 

A small gully bund like this one Prevents a new Gully being formed in the middle of the farm, thus preventing erosion from the 

beginning itself. Such bunds would make two parts of one field, thus making it difficult to plough, but some farmers are ready to do it. 

4. Stone bunding: 

After filling the Staggered Trenches, the excess water flows out in the form of little streams. To stop these streams, the obstruction walls 

of the length equal to the width of the streams are made with the help of stones. Such walls are created at an interval of 200 to 300 meters along 

the channels of the streams. These walls are known as Stone bunding. 

5. Percolation tank 

Percolation Tank is the arrangement in which the retaining walls of clay are made and a dam (waste weir) is constructed using cement 

concrete. This tank is preferred at the site where two to three rain water streams meet. The outlet is also planned so that excess water overflows 

out of it. The Storage Tank is a good basin for water storage. 


Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Sr. No. 


villages 

Initiation of 

village level 

institution 

(lakh) 

Capacity 

building 

(lakh) 

IEC 

activities 

(lakh) 

Baseline 

survey 

(lakh) 

Hydrogeological 

survey 

(lakh) 

Any other 

(please 

specify) 

(lakh) 

Estimated Cost 

(Rs. in lakh) 

1 Kharetha 0.73 2.23 1.02 0.22 0.07 0.092 4.36 

2 Kund 0.18 0.56 0.26 0.06 0.02 0.023 1.10 

3 Vandarveli 0.53 1.62 0.74 0.16 0.05 0.067 3.17 

4 Valpor 0.38 1.15 0.53 0.11 0.04 0.047 2.26 

5 Galiba 1.21 3.72 1.70 0.36 0.12 0.152 7.26 

6 Fichvada 0.59 1.81 0.83 0.18 0.06 0.074 3.54 

7 Rupghat 0.56 1.70 0.78 0.17 0.06 0.070 3.34 

8 Sankoi 1.32 4.04 1.85 0.40 0.13 0.166 7.91 

9 Varkhadi 0.48 1.48 0.67 0.14 0.05 0.060 2.88 

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

Village 

name 

Kharetha 

Kund 

Proposed target 

Augmentation/ repair of existing 

structures Construction of new structures Total target 

Area to 

Area to 

Area to 

Est. 

be Storage Estimated 

be 

be 

Cost 

irrigated capacity cost 

irrigated Storage 

irrigated Storage 

No. (ha) (lit.) (lakh) 

(lakh) 

No. (ha) capacity 

(ha) cap.(lit) 

Type of structures 

Pond 1 7.65 11250 1.8 8 11250 1.8 

Check dam 2 12 22000 4 6 35.29 66667 12.0 47 88889 16 

Percolation tank 2 2.50 5000 1.0 3 5000 1 

TOTAL 2 12 22000 4 8 37.79 71667 13 50 93889 18.8 

Pond 1 6.38 9375 1.5 6 9375 1.5 

Check dam 1 4.41 8333 1.5 4 8333 1.5 

Percolation tank 2 2.50 5000 1.0 3 5000 1 

TOTAL 0 0 0 0 4 13.29 22708 4 13.29 22708 4 

Est. 

Cost 

(lakh) 


Vanderveli Pond 1 8.50 12500 2 9 12500 2 

Check dam 1 9 16667 3 5 33.82 63889 11.5 43 80556 14.5 

Percolation tank 3 3.75 7500 1.5 3.75 7500 1.5 

TOTAL 1 9 16667 3 9 46.07 83889 15 54.90 100556 18 

Valpor Pond 1 6.38 9375 1.5 6 9375 1.5 

Check dam 4 26.21 49500 8.91 26 49500 8.91 

Percolation tank 

TOTAL 0 0 0 0 5 32.58 58875 10.41 33 58875 10.41 

Galiba Pond 1 8.50 12500 2 9 12500 2 

Check dam 1 4 8333 1.5 15 104.12 196667 35.4 109 205000 36.9 


TOTAL 1 4 8333 1.5 16 112.62 209167 37.4 117 217500 38.9 

Fichwada Pond 

Check dam 7 61.76 116667 21 62 116667 21 


TOTAL 0 0 0 0 7 61.76 116667 21 62 116667 21 

Rupghat Pond 1 8.50 12500 2.0 9 12500 2.0 

Check dam 6 20.59 38889 7.0 21 38889 7.0 

Percolation tank 2 2.50 5000 1.0 3 5000 1.0 

TOTAL 0 0 0 0 9 31.59 56389 10 32 56389 10 

Sankoi Pond 1 6.38 9375 1.5 6 9375 1.5 

Check dam 2 13 24333 4.38 10 87.71 165667 29.82 101 190000 34.2 


TOTAL 2 13 24333 4.38 11 94.08 175042 31.32 107 199375 35.7 

Varkhadi Pond 0 0 0 

Check dam 3 20.59 38889 7 21 38889 7 


TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3 20.59 38889 7 21 38889 7 


Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) 

S. No. 


Villages 

Type of structures 

Construction of new recharging structures 

No. 

Area to be 

irrigated (ha) 

Estimated cost 

(lakh) 

Area to be 

irrigated (ha) 

Total target 

Estimated cost (lakh) 

1 Kharetha Open wells 3 12 4.50 12 4.50 

2 Kund Open wells 2 10 3.00 10 3.00 

3 Vandrveli Open wells 2 10 3.00 10 3.00 

4 Valpor Open wells 1 4 1.50 4 1.50 

5 Galiba Open wells 1 3 1.50 3 1.50 

6 Fichvada Open wells 1 4 1.50 4 1.50 

7 Rupghat Open wells 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 

8 Sankoi Open wells 5 19 7.50 19 7.50 

9 Varkhadi Open wells 2 7 3.00 7 3.00 

Total for the Project 17 69 25.5 69 25.5 

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas 

Sr. No. 

Names of Villages 

1 Sankoi-1 

Name of activity 

Major activities of the SHGs 

No. of SHGs 

involved 

Average annual income from 

activity per SHG (Rs.) 

Nursery 40 35000 

Vermi Net House 36 30000 

Animal Husbandry 7 46500 

Floor mill 7 36000 

Poultry unit 12 78000 

mini oil mill 23 15000 

Fisheries 10 75000 

Utensil service 7 59500 

Gaucher Dev.& fruit tree plantation 9 70000 


Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target (cost in lakh) 

S. 

No. 


villages 

Ridge area 

treatment 

Drainage line 

treatment 

Nursery 

raising 

Land 

development 

Crop 

demonstrations 

Pasture 

development 

Fishery 

development 

Rmt cost NO cost Ha cost Ha cost Ha cost Ha cost Unit cost 

Total 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. In 

lakhs) 

1 Khaetha 2661 1.0 42 27.2 68.41 0.76 26 24.65 1.85 0.24 2 0.26 - 0 54.1 

2 Kund 2661 1.0 11 4 32.4 0.36 6 12.58 1.15 0.15 2 0.26 - 0 18.4 

3 Vanderveli 2661 1.0 15 17.88 43 0.48 21 21.23 4.00 0.52 2 0.26 - 0 41.4 

4 Valpor 1330 0.5 21 19.51 54 0.6 29 15.33 1.92 0.25 1 0.13 - 0 36.3 

5 Galiba 2661 1.0 61 51.15 68 0.75 35 21.68 4.00 0.52 8 1.04 3 1.5 77.6 

6 fichwada 2661 1.0 24 28.1 49.5 0.55 23 18.06 2.00 0.26 4 0.52 3 1.5 50.0 

7 Rupghat 2661 1.0 59 23.71 22.5 0.25 67 22.86 2.00 0.26 4 0.52 2 1 49.6 

8 Sankoi 6652 2.5 50 45.4 100.81 1.12 65 37.12 7.69 1.00 8 1.04 - 0 88.2 

9 Varkhadi 1330 0.5 29 14.54 36 0.4 27 18.57 7.69 1.00 4 0.52 2 1 36.5 

total 25278.0 9.5 312.0 231.5 474.6 5.3 299.0 192.1 32.3 4.2 35.0 4.6 10.0 5.0 452.1 


Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* 

S. 

No. 

Village 

name 

1 Kharetha 

2 Kund 

Name of structures 

Type of treatment 

Ridg 

e 

area 

(R) 

Drai 

nage 

line 

(D) 

Land 

dev. 

(L) 

Priva 

te 

Type of land 

Comm 

unity 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

UG,SHG, 

No. of 

units 

(No./ 

cu.m./ 

rmt) 

Target 


(Rs. in lakh) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

M W O T 

Gully Plug L P WC 19 2.77 2011 

Farm bunding L P WC 2495 1.25 2012 

Contour trench R C UG 2661 1 2011 

Stone bund L P WC 1112 4.81 2012 

Nala Plug D C F WC 34 11.2 2013 

New Pond L C UG 1 1.8 2013 

Percolation Tank L P WC 2 1 2014 

New well L P WC 3 4.5 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 2 2012 

Check dam D C F UG 6 12 2014 

Check dam Desilting D C UG 2 4 2014 

Total 

46.34 


Contour trench R C UG 2661 1 2011 



New Pond L C UG 1 1.5 2013 

Percolation Tank L P WC 2 1 2014 

New well L P WC 2 3 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 2.00 2014 

Check dam D C UG 1 1.5 2014 

Total 

16.05 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completion 

(mm/yyyy) 


3 Vanderveli 

4 Valpor 

5 Galiba 



Contour trench R C UG 2661 1.00 2011 



New Pond L P UG 1 2.00 2013 

Percolation Tank L P WC 3 1.50 2014 

New well L P WC 2 3.00 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 2.50 2012 

Check dam D C UG 5 11.50 2014 

Check dam Repairing D C UG 1 3.00 2014 

Total 35.43 






New Pond L C UG 1 1.50 2013 

New well L P WC 1 1.50 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 2.00 2012 

Check dam D C F UG 4 8.91 2014 

Total 

30.49 






New Pond L C UG 1 2.00 2013 

New well L P WC 1 1.50 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 3.00 2012 



Total 

67.46 


6 Fichwada 

7 Rupghat 

8 Sankoi 






New Pond L C UG 1 2.00 2013 

New well L P WC 1 1.50 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 2.50 2012 


Check dam Desilting UG 2014 

Total 42.00 






New Pond L C UG 1 2.00 2013 

Percolation Tank L P WC 2 1.00 2014 

Outlet L C WC 1 2.50 2014 


Total 42.10 






New Pond L C UG 1 1.50 2013 

New well L P WC 5 7.50 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 2.50 2012 



Total 76.93 


9 Varkhadi 






New Pond UG 2013 

Percolation Tank WC 2014 

New well L P WC 2 3.00 2013 

Outlet L C UG 1 2.50 2012 


Check dam Desilting UG 2014 

Total 28.96 

Table no. 40.1 Technical structure of Gully plug 

Table no. 40.1.1 Estimation of Gully Plug 

SR.NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Qty Rate Amount 

1 Excavation 1 1.00 2.00 0.30 0.60 69.60 41.76 

2 Below G.L Stone 1 1.00 2.00 0.30 0.60 523.30 523.30 

3 Above G.l 1 1.00 2.00+1.25/2 

4 1 1.00 1.63 1.25 2.03 523.30 1770.50 

5 Per 1 mt cost 2335.56 


Table no. 40.1.2 Technical specification Gully Plug 

SR.No PARTICULARS VALUE UNITS 

1 Top width of bund 1.25 M 

2 Bottom width of bund 2 M 

3 Depth above G.L 1.25 M 

4 Depth of foundation 0.3 M 

5 Cross section of bund 1.63 SQ.M 

Table no. 40.2 Estimation of Stone Bunding 


1 Above G.l stone bund 1 1.00 1.00+0.60/2 0.75 

2 1 1.00 0.80 0.75 0.60 523.30 523.30 

3 Per 1 mt cost 523.30 

0.60 M 

0.75 M 

1.00 M 

SR.No PARTICULARS VALUE UNITS 


2 Bottom width of bund 1.00 M 

3 Depth above G.L 0.75 M 

5 Cross section of bund 0.60 Sq.m 


Table no. 40.3 Estimation of Farm Bunding 


1 Farm Bund 1 1.00 2.1+0.75/2 0.75 

1 1.00 1.425 0.75 1.06875 46.9 50.1 

SR. No PARTICULARS VALUE UNITS 


2 Bottom width of bund 2.1 M 

3 Height of bund 1.25 M 

4 Cross section of bund 1.425 Sq.m 


Estimation of Nala plug 6.00 m 

NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY Rate Per Amount 

1 

2 

3 

4 

Excavation for foundation …. 

Body wall 1 2.00 1.20 1.20 2.88 

Apron 1 1.70 1.20 0.60 1.22 

End wall 1 1.70 0.60 0.60 0.61 

Wing wall 2 1.80 0.90 0.90 2.92 

Key wall - L & R side 2 2.15 1.20 0.90 4.64 12.28 69.60 Cu.m 854.4096 

Cement concrete in 1:4:8 

Body wall 1 2.00 1.20 0.10 0.24 

Apron 1 2.00 2.85 0.10 0.57 

End wall 1 1.70 0.60 0.10 0.10 

Wing wall 2 1.95 0.90 0.10 0.35 

Key wall - L & R side 2 2.15 1.20 0.10 0.52 1.779 2270.90 Cu.m 4039.9311 

coarse rubble masonary in c.m 1:6 

Body wall up to g.l 1 2.00 0.90 1.10 1.98 

Body wall up to g.l to top( B= 

0.9+0.6/2=.75) 1 2.00 0.75 1.00 1.50 

Apron 1 2.00 1.50 0.30 0.90 

End wall up to top 1 2.00 0.30 0.50 0.30 

Wing wall up to g.l. 2 1.80 0.60 0.80 1.73 

Wing wall up to g.l to top. ( h = 

1.30+0.30/2 ) 2 1.80 0.60 0.80 1.73 

Key wall - L & R side up to g.l. 2 2.00 0.60 1.10 2.64 

Key wall - L g.l to top 2 2.00 0.60 1.20 2.88 13.66 1998 Cu.m 27283.3224 

concrete ( 1 : 2 : 4 ) with black stone 

Body wall 1 2.00 0.60 0.10 0.12 

Apron 1 2.00 1.50 0.20 0.60 

End wall 1 2.00 0.30 0.10 0.06 

Wing wall 2 2.00 0.60 0.10 0.24 

Key wall - L & R side 2 2.00 0.60 0.10 0.24 1.26 3215 Cu.m 4050.27 


cement plastering in cm 1:3 ( 20mm 

tk ) 

Body wall 2 2.00 1.10 4.40 

Apron 1 2.00 1.50 3.00 

5 

End wall 2 2.00 0.45 1.80 

End wall top 1 2.00 0.30 0.60 

Wing wall top 2 2.00 0.60 2.40 

Fair side of wing wall 2 1.80 0.80 2.88 

Key wall - L & R side top 2 2.00 0.60 2.40 

Key wall - L & R both side 4 2.00 0.60 4.80 22.28 113.3 Sq.m 2524.324 

6 Name plate. 1 nos 1200 Nos 1200 

TOTAL :- 39952.2571 

SAY :- 39900.00 

Cross section of Nala Plug 

Cross section of Nala Plu 


Table no. 40.5 Estimation of Check dam 

Estimate of Check dam 

NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY RATE PER AMOUNT 

Excavation for foundation … 

Body wall...... 1 5.00 2.00 1.50 15.00 

Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 1.50 6.75 

1 

Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 1.50 6.75 

Side wall......... 2 1.80 2.00 1.50 10.80 

End wall....... 1 9.00 0.60 0.60 3.24 

Apron..... 1 5.00 1.80 0.60 5.40 

47.94 69.6 3336.624 

C.C 1:4:8 ….. 

Body wall...... 1 5.00 2.00 0.30 3.00 

Key wall (L) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 0.30 1.35 

2 

Key wall (R) side........ 1 2.25 2.00 0.30 1.35 

Side wall......... 2 1.80 2.00 0.30 2.16 

End wall....... 1 9.00 0.60 0.30 1.62 

Apron..... 1 5.00 2.50 0.30 3.75 

13.23 2271 30044.01 

C.C 1:2:4 ….. 

3 

Body wall up to G.L....... 1 5.00 1.50 1.20 9.00 

Body wall up to G.L to top… 1 5.50 1.125 1.50 9.28 

(B=.75+1.5/2=1.125) 

Key wall top 2 2.25 0.75 0.15 0.51 

End wall top..... 1 5.50 0.30 0.15 0.25 

Side wall top..... 2 2.50 0.75 0.15 0.56 

Apron.... 1 5.50 2.45 0.30 4.04 

23.64 

3215 75990.78 


C.C 1:3:6 

Key wall up to G.L........ 2 2.25 1.50 1.20 8.10 

Key wall up to G.L to top...... 2 2.25 1.125 2.00 10.13 

.(B=.75+1.5/2=1.125) 

4 

Side wall up to G.L...... 2 2.75 1.50 1.20 9.90 

Side wall up to G.L to top… 2 2.75 1.125 2.00 12.38 

(B.=.75+1.5/2=1.125) 0.00 

End wall up to G.L... 1 5.00 0.30 0.30 0.45 

End wall up to G.L to top..... 1 5.50 0.30 0.30 0.50 

41.45 2509 103997.9 

Cement plaster in 20 mm tk 

Body wall top.. 1 5.50 0.75 4.13 

Body wall D/S side... 1 5.50 1.50 8.25 

Body wall u/S side... 1 5.50 1.50 8.25 

5 

Side wall top... 2 2.75 0.75 4.13 

Side wall inner side.. 2 2.50 2.15 10.75 

Side wall front side.. 2 1.125 2.15 4.84 

Endwall side…. 2 5.50 0.30 3.30 

End wall top… 1 5.50 0.30 1.65 

45.29 113 5131.074 

6 Name plate 1 1 Nos 500 500 

TOTAL AMOUNT :- 219000.42 

SAY :- 219000.00 


Cross section of check dam 


Table no. 40.6 Estimation of New pond 

NO DESCRIPTION NO L B D/H QTY T.QTY RATE PER AMOUNT 

1 Excavation work of pond 1 65+45/2 58+40/2 1.50 

55.00 49.00 1.50 4042.50 4042.50 49.60 200508 


Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works 

S. 

No 

. 


village 

Name of structure/ 

work 

Type of treatment 

(i) 

Ridg 

e 

area 

(R) 

Drai 

nage 

line 

(D) 

(iii) 

Lan 

d 

dev. 

(L) 

Priv 

ate 


Com 

mun 

ity 

Oth 

ers 

(pl. 

spec 

ify) 

Executin 

g agency 

UG 

SHG 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Area 

(ha) 


plants 

Target 

Estima 

ted 

cost 

(Rs. in 

lakh) 

Expected 

month & 

year of 

completio 

n (mm/ 

yyyy) 

1 Kharetha 

2 Kund 

3 

Vanderve 

li 

Distribution of 

horticulture plant 

L P WC 1.18 475 1.9 2013 

Fruit tree plantation L C SHG 1 400 1.29 2012 

Farm forestry L P WC 10.9 12100 1.21 2013 

Fuel wood and Timber 

plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.21 2014 

fodder development L C SHG 2 0.26 2013 

Nursery L C SHG 68.41 76000 0.76 2014 

Total 88.49 101085 6.63 



L P WC 0.5 207.5 0.83 2013 



plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.211 2014 

fodder development L C SHG 2.0 0.26 2013 

Nursery L C SHG 32.40 36000 0.36 2014 

Total 43.52 52317 3.06 



L P WC 0.86 345 1.38 2013 


Farm forestry L P WC 7 8000 0.8 2013 



4 Valpor 

5 Galiba 

6 Fichwada 

Nursery L C SHG 43 48000 0.48 2014 

Total 59.27 68855 5.42 



L P WC 0.86 348 1.39 2013 




plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.211 2014 


Nursery L C SHG 54 60000 0.6 2014 

Total 70.52 82457 5.58 



L P WC 1.63 650 2.6 2013 




plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.211 2014 


Nursery L C SHG 68 75000 0.75 2014 

Total 94.47 100760 8.15 



L P WC 1.03 412.5 1.65 2013 




plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.211 2014 


Nursery L C SHG 49.50 55000 0.55 2014 

Total 69.63 78022 6.23 


7 Rupghat 

8 Sankoi 

9 Varkhadi 



L P WC 1.10 442.5 1.77 2013 




plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.211 2014 


Nursery L C SHG 22.50 25000 0.25 2014 

Total 

42.50 50052 6.25 



L P WC 1.625 650 2.6 2013 




plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.211 2014 


Nursery L C SHG 100.81 112000 1.12 2014 

Total 

143.43 155150 10.26 



L P WC 0.681 272.5 1.09 2013 




plantation 

L C SHG 5 12110 1.211 2014 


Nursery L C SHG 36.00 40000 0.4 2014 

Total 

56.23 63382 5.57 


Estimation of Fruit tree plantation 

Sr. No. Description No L B H QTY T.QTY 

RATE 

Rs. 

T.AMOUNT Rs. 

1 Site clearance & ploughing with cultivation Lump sump 5500 5500.00 

2 Excavation of plant pit 533 0.45 0.45 0.45 48.57 48.57 69.6 3380.45 

3 No. of Mango plants 400 400 55 22000.00 

4 No. of drumstick plants 133 133 12 1596.00 

5 

Three times of weeding & soil work, with 

transportation charges 533 533 8.5 4530.50 

6 400 mt fencing work 400 Per Rmt 400 230 92000.00 

TOTAL :- 129006.95 

Estimation of Fuel wood and timber plantation in 1 hac. 

Sr. 

No. Description No. 

Length 

(m) 

Width 

(m) 

Width 

(m) Unit Quantity 

Rate 

Rs. 

Amount Rs. 

1 Site clearance 1 Per hac. 6048.00 

2 Digging of pits for plants in Soft soil 1111 0.3 0.3 0.3 29.997 69.60 2087.79 

3 Rate per plant 1111 1111 4.00 4444.00 

4 

Transport of plants from Nursery to camp 

site with Loading and unloading of plants 

1111 1111 3.00 3333 

5 

Cost of Fertilizer & insecticides including 

application. 1111 1111 2.00 2222.00 

6 Weeding and soil working 2 times 1111 1111 6.00 6666.00 

7 Site cleaning of prosopis 400 400 13.00 5200.00 

8 TOTAL :- 30000.791 


Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities 

Sr. No. 


village 

1 Kharetha 


Executing 

agency 

Target 


Others UG, SHG and Estimated Expected month & 

Private Community (pl. 

specify) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 

year of completion 

(mm/yyyy) 

Vermi compost net house C SHG 1.25 2014 

Kitchen Garden kit P UG 0.15 2011 

Animal husbandry C SHG 2.26 2012 

Poultry unit C SHG 0.60 2012 

Tailoring Machine P UG 0.35 2013 

Cattle camp C UG 0.90 2014 

Cycle Repairing kit with cabin P WC 1.00 2011 

Floriculture Demo. Plot P UG 0.59 2014 

High yielding varieties seed 

Distribution P UG 0.75 2013 

Crop Demonstration P UG 0.24 2014 

Lift irrigation unit P UG 1.50 2011 

Mini oil mill Unit C SHG 0.10 2011 

Revolving fund C SHG 0.15 2013 

Leaf plate and Cup making 

Machine C SHG 0.10 2012 

Hair saloon with cabin P UG 0.50 2013 

Floor mill with rice mill with 

engine machine C SHG 1.50 2012 

Cantering C WC 1.00 2014 

Mixer machine C SHG 1.75 2014 

Sugarcane juice machine P UG 0.50 2013 

Masonry kit P UG 0.10 2012 

Total 15.29 


Sr. No. 


village 


Private 


Community 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

UG, SHG and 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Target 

Expected month & 


(mm/yyyy) 







2 Kund 













Total 6.42 


Sr. No. 


village 

3 Vanderveli 


Private 


Community 

Others 

(pl. 

specify) 

Executing 

agency 

UG, SHG and 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

Estimated 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 

Target 

Expected month & 


(mm/yyyy) 




















Utensil service C SHG 2.00 2014 

Total 12.49 


Sr. No. 


village 

4 Valpor 


Executing 

agency 

Target 




specify) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


(mm/yyyy) 




















Total 11.58 


Sr. No. 


village 

5 Galiba 


Executing 

agency 

Target 




specify) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


(mm/yyyy) 





















Fisheries P UG 1.50 2014 


Bidi making kit P UG 0.10 2012 

Total 24.27 


Sr. No. 


village 

6 Fichwada 


Executing 

agency 

Target 




specify) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


(mm/yyyy) 





















Total 11.45 


Sr. No. 


village 

7 Rupghat 


Executing 

agency 

Target 




specify) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


(mm/yyyy) 






















Handy craft unit (Bamboo) P UG 0.40 2012 

Total 12.79 


Sr. No. 


village 

8 Sankoi 


Executing 

agency 

Target 




specify) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


(mm/yyyy) 





















Centaring C SHG 1.00 2011 

Bidi making kit P UG 0.10 2012 

Masonry kit P UG 0.30 2013 


Mixer machine C SHG 1.75 2012 

Total 31.42 


Sr. No. 


village 

9 Varkhadi 


Executing 

agency 

Target 




specify) 

Others (pl. 

specify) 

cost (Rs. 

in lakh) 


(mm/yyyy) 




















Handy craft unit (Bamboo) P UG 0.40 2013 



Total 11.18 


Estimation of Vermi compost unit 

No Description No L B H Qty T.Qty Rate Per Amount 

1 Excavtion for pole foundation 6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.296 1.296 

Excavation Long wall 2 6 0.3 0.45 1.62 1.62 

2 3 0.3 0.45 0.81 0.81 

3.726 69.6 Cu.m 259.3296 

2 Excavtion p.c.c. 1:4:8 6 0.6 0.6 0.6 1.296 1.296 

2 6 0.3 0.1 0.36 0.36 

2 3 0.3 0.1 0.18 0.18 

1.836 2270.9 Cu.m 4169.372 

3 Outer side brick Masonary 2 6 0.23 0.75 2.07 2.07 

2 3 0.23 0.75 1.035 1.035 

3.105 3.105 2403.4 Cu.m 7462.557 

4 M.S.Pole 1.25 " 6 3 18 

Vertical pole 4 3 12 

Top horizontal long side 3 3 9 

Top horizontal Short Side 39 39 129 k.g. 5031 

5 90% Green net 

Long side 2 7 3 21 

short side 2 4 3 12 

Top of green house 1 6 3 18 

51 51 40 Sq.m. 2040 

6 Esiana fortyda verm. 25 30 30 150 kg 4500 

7 Cement plaster 

Long side wall 4 6 0.3 7.2 

short side wall 2 3 0.3 1.8 

long wall top 2 6 0.23 2.76 

short wall top 2 3 0.23 1.38 

8 Nat bulots , labour charges Lump sump 1345 

13.14 71.8 Sq.m. 943.452 

25750.71 


Cost estimation of animal husbandry 

PROJECT REPORT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDARY 

Particulars 

Total expenditure 

Invest of 10 nos. of Buffallos = 10 x 22000 220000 

TOTAL :- 220000 

Monthly Expenditure 

10kg cattle food per buffalos per day 

10kg x 10 buffalo's x 30 per day= 3000 kg requirement of 

cattle food per month ( 43 x 525 ) 22575 

Per day per buffallo, green grass = 20 kg 

Total expenditure = 20kg x 10 buf. X 30 days = 6000 kg 

( 6000 x 0.40 ) 2400 

Veterinary charges ( 200 x 10 ) 2000 

TOTAL :- 26975 

MONTHLY INCOME 

Per day buffallo total production = 10 lit. 

10 lit x 10 buf. X 30 day = 3000 lit. 

Per lit = 24 Rs /- ( 3000 x 24 ) 72000 

Production of dung per Animal = 1 ton 

Per 10 Animal = 1 x 10 = 10 ton 

( 10 X 4000 ) 4000 

Empty begs ( 40 x 10 ) 400 

TOTAL :- 76400 

Total income of milk production 76400 x 10 :- 764000 

Total expenditure ( 12 * 26975 ):- 323700 

Net Profit 440300 

Annual income per Animal 44030 

MONTHLY INCOME PER ANIMAL:- 4403 


Estimation of Utensil services 

Sr. No. Particulars No Rate Per Amount 

Kitchen Set 

1 Plate, Bowl, Glass, Spoon. 250 125 Set 31250 

2 Chairs 180 300 no 54000 

3 Table 10 4500 no 45000 

4 Water pip 3 1500 no 4500 

5 Big & Small Tapela,Big Spoon,Tavdi,Kthrot etc. 1 40000 Set 40000 

6 chulo and pipe 3 7000 set 21000 

7 Patharana 1 5250 set 5250 

Total :- 201000 


Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas 

Target 

S. No. 

Name(s) of the 

villages 

CPR 

particulars 

Activity proposed 

Target area under 

the activity (ha) 

Estimated 

expenditure (Rs.) 

Expected no. 

of 

beneficiaries 

1 Kharetha Gouchar Fodder Development 4 0.52 10 

Fuel wood and timber plantation 5 1.21 11 

Fruit tree plantation 1 1.29 11 

New Pond 7.65 1.80 7 

Outlet 5.9 2.00 7 

Total 23.6 6.8 46.0 

2 Vanderveli Gouchar Fodder Development 2 0.26 10 

New Pond 8.5 2.00 8 



Outlet 7.4 2.50 8 

Total 23.9 7.3 48.0 

3 Valpor Gouchar Fodder Development 1 0.13 11 



New Pond 8.5 1.50 5 

Outlet 7.4 2.50 5 

Total 22.9 6.6 37.0 

4 Galiba Gouchar Fuel wood and timber plantation 5 1.21 9 


Fodder Development 8 1.04 10 

New Pond 8.5 2.00 8 

Outlet 7.4 3.00 8 

Total 29.9 8.5 45.0 


5 Fichwada Gouchar 




Outlet 7.4 2.50 7 


Total 22.4 6.7 46.0 

6 Rupghat Gouchar Fruit tree plantation 1 1.29 10 


New Pond 8.5 2.00 8 

Outlet 7.4 2.50 8 

Total 43.3 13.0 81 

7 Sankoi Waste land Check dam 28.4 8.25 10 

Check dam repairing 15.1 4.38 12 

New Pond 7.9 1.50 7 

Outlet 8.6 2.50 7 

Total 60.1 16.6 36.0 

8 Varkhadi Waste land Outlet 7.4 2.50 7 




Total 17.4 5.5 35.0 


4.4 Capacity Building 

Capacity building is a process to strengthen the abilities of people, organizations and systems to make effective and efficient use of 

resources in order to make achieve their own goals on a sustainable basis” (German Technical Corporation). The definition pretty much 

captures the essence of capacity building exercise in a holistic way by mentioning organization and system along with people. From a long time, 

the focus has been on people only. This leads to a distorted and suboptimal outcome of the whole capacity building exercise. No wonder, the 

realization has dawned upon the policymakers and they have started to emphasize upon the holistic approach rather than a piecemeal one. 

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: 

S. 

No. 


Training 

Institute 

Full Address 

with contact 

no., website & 

e-mail 

1 KVK Chaswad 

Type of 

Institute# 

Research 

institute 

Area(s) of 

specialization$ 

Accredita 

tion 

details 

Reference 

Year 

Trainings 


trainings 

assigned 


trainees to 

be trained 

Agriculture/Horticulture 

/Animal husbandry GoI 2011-2014 3 90 

2 AKRSP Netrang NGO Capacity building Private 2010-2014 3 450 

3 

Navsari 

Agriculture uni. Navsari University 

4 BISAG Gandhinagar 

Agriculture/Horticulture 

/Animal husbandry GoI 2011-2014 2 70 

Space 

Application Remote sensing & GIS GoG 2010-2015 3 9 


Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: 

Sr. No. 


Project 

1 Sankoi-I 

Project Stakeholders 

Total no. of 

persons 

No. of persons to 

be trained 

No. of training 

programmes 


(lakh) 

PIA 5 5 5 1.50 

WDTs 4 4 5 1.94 

UGs 245 90 5 6.60 

SHGs 450 450 7 17.90 

WCs 111 18 5 0.90 

Others (Pl. specify) 150 90 2 1.00 

Total 965 657 29 29.84 

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities: 

Sr. No. Activity Executing agency 

Estimated 

expenditure (Rs.) 

Outcome 

(may quantify, wherever possible) 

1 Street plays Local Drama Groups 75000 

2 Video shows Rajpipla West Forest Division 45000 

3 Pamphlets and posters Rajpipla West Forest Division 27000 

Awareness for the important of 

watershed project 

4 Banners & Hordings Rajpipla West Forest Division 55000 


Figure- Capacity Building Training Activities 


CHAPTER-5 

BUDGETING 

The first step in budgeting is dividing the cost of the project into various component s as detailed in the common guidelines and done 

accordingly in table no. 47. It helps us in further identifying activities under different components and allocate appropriate funds. 

Table no. 47: Village wise- activity wise budget (Rs. In Lakh) 

Sr. No. Village Activity 

EPA 

Institution 

and CB 

DPR 

Watershed 

development 

Work 

Livelihood 

for asset 

less 

Production 

system and 

Microenterprises 

Consolidation 

TOTAL 

1 Kharetha 2.91 3.63 0.73 36.34 7.27 9.45 3.63 63.96 

2 Kund 0.73 0.92 0.18 9.16 1.83 2.38 0.92 16.12 

3 Vandarveli 2.11 2.64 0.53 26.43 5.29 6.87 2.64 46.51 

4 Valpor 1.5 1.88 0.38 18.78 3.76 4.88 1.88 33.06 

5 Galiba 4.84 6.05 1.21 60.46 12.09 15.72 6.05 106.42 

6 Fichvada 2.36 2.95 0.59 29.5 5.9 7.67 2.95 51.92 

7 Rupghat 2.22 2.78 0.56 27.79 5.56 7.22 2.78 48.91 

8 Sankoi 5.27 6.59 1.32 65.93 13.19 17.14 6.59 116.03 

9 Varkhadi 1.92 2.4 0.48 24 4.8 6.24 2.4 42.24 

TOTAL 23.86 29.84 5.98 298.39 59.69 77.57 29.84 525.17 


Table no. 48: Budget at a glance 

Sr. No. Budget component Cost (lakh) 

1 Administrative costs 59.68 

2 Monitoring 5.97 

3 Evaluation 5.97 

4 Entry Point activity 23.87 

5 Institution and Capacity Building 29.84 

6 Detailed Project Report 5.97 

7 Watershed Development Works 298.39 

8 Livelihood activities for asset less 59.68 

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 77.58 

10 Consolidation phase 29.84 

TOTAL 596.79 

Table no.49: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes (Rs. In Lakh) 

Sr. No. Village Total cost requirement 

Total fund available 

under IWMP Gap in fund requirement 

1 Kharetha 68.42 53.06 15.36 

2 Kund 26.73 13.37 13.37 

3 Vandarveli 53.34 38.59 14.75 

4 Valpor 47.67 27.42 19.88 

5 Galiba 99.88 88.27 11.61 

6 Fichvada 59.48 43.07 16.26 

7 Rupghat 60.84 40.57 20.27 

8 Shankoi 118.96 96.26 22.70 

9 Varkhadi 45.81 35.04 10.77 

Total 581.13 435.65 144.97 


Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with oth0er Schemes 

S. No. Name of village 

1 Kharetha 

2 Kund 


Departments with 

Schemes 

converging with 

IWMP 

Fund made 

available to 

IWMP due to 

convergence 

(Rs. in lakh) 

Was this fund 

included in 

Rs.12,000/ 15,000 

per ha. 

Yes 

No 

Name of activity/task/structure 

undertaken with converged funds 

(a) Structures 

(b) livelihoods 

(c ) Any other (pl. specify) 

Farm Bunding 

MGNREGS 0.50 

MGNREGS 1.00 Contour Trenches 

MGNREGS 4.50 New well 

MGNREGS 2.00 Check dam 

MGNREGS 4.00 Check dam Desilting 

Yes 

TASP 1.50 Lift Irrigation 

Forest 1.21 Fuel wood and Timber plantation 

Forest 0.50 Farm forestry 

SGSY 0.15 Revolving fund 

Total 15.36 

MGNREGS 0.91 

Gully Plug 



MGNREGS 2.64 Stone Bunding 

MGNREGS 1.00 Percolation Tank 

SGSY 2.26 Yes 

Animal husbandry 


TASP 0.75 Lift irrigation unit 

Forest 0.50 Dis. Of Horti.plant 


Total 13.37 

Level at which 

decision for 

convergence 

was taken 

District Level 



3 Vanderveli 

4 Valpor 

5 Galiba 

MGNREGS 

MGNREGS 

1.50 

1.00 

Farm Bunding 

Contour Trenches 




MGNREGS 1.50 Yes 

Percolation Tank 





Total 14.75 

MGNREGS 1.15 

Farm Bunding 


MGNREGS 1.56 Gully plug 

MGNREGS 1.70 Nalaplug 



Forest 1.21 Yes 

Fuel wood and Timber plantation 



SGSY 2.26 Animal Husbandry 



Total 19.88 

MGNREGS 1.50 

Farm Bunding 




Yes 




Total 11.61 





6 Fichwada 

7 Rupghat 

8 Sankoi 

MGNREGS 1.00 

Farm Bunding 





Yes 





Total 16.26 

MGNREGS 2.60 

Farm Bunding 


MGNREGS 5.06 Gully plug 

MGNREGS 4.65 Nala Plug 

MGNREGS 1.00 Percolation Tank 


Yes 






Total 20.27 

MGNREGS 1.00 

Farm Bunding 




TASP 5.25 Yes 

Lift irrigation unit 




Total 22.70 





9 Varkhadi 

MGNREGS 2.67 

Farm Bunding 




Forest 1.29 Fruit tree plantation unit 

Yes 





Total 10.77 



CHAPTER-6 

EXPECTED OUTCOME 

6.1 Expected Outcomes 

6.1.1 Employment 

Employment is a big problem in the Sankoi project. Main occupation of the villagers is agriculture, animal husbandry and wage labour. 

However, due to Moderate Slope / Hilly soil, farmers take only kharif crops. Only few farmers take rabi crops. Lack of fodder, animal husbandry 

is very difficult in the villages. So farmers mainly depend on wage labour whole over the year. 

Project will provide wage employment as well as self employment to the villagers. Wage employment would be created by engaging the 

people in watershed development work like construction of check dam, farm bunding, nala plug, staggered contour trenches, Afforestation 

work. Self employment would be created by providing different agriculture activities like nursery, vermi-compost, fruit tree plantation and in 

animal husbandry by providing animals and fodder directly to the farmers. Project would provide indirectly self employment to the women 

through training activities of tailoring, poultry, fisheries, Utensil services, mini oil mill, leaf plate and cup making machine. 


Table no. 51: Employment in Project area: 

Wage employment 

Self employment 

Sr. Names of 

No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries 

No. Villages SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total 

1 Kharetha 0 43767 0 21883 43767 0 438 0 219 438 0 131 0 66 131 

2 Kund 0 6233 0 3117 6233 0 62 0 31 62 0 19 0 9 19 

3 Vandarveli 0 8367 0 4183 8367 0 84 0 42 84 0 25 0 13 25 

4 Valpor 0 29200 0 14600 29200 0 292 0 146 292 0 88 0 44 88 

5 Galiba 0 45500 0 22750 45500 0 455 0 228 455 0 137 0 68 137 

6 Fichvada 0 19267 0 9633 19267 0 193 0 96 193 0 58 0 29 58 

7 Rupghat 0 19633 0 9817 19633 0 196 0 98 196 0 59 0 29 59 

8 Sankoi 0 60367 0 30183 60367 0 604 0 302 604 0 181 0 91 181 

9 Varkhadi 0 25967 0 12983 25967 0 260 0 130 260 0 78 0 39 78 

6.1.2. Migration 

Project would decrease the 100 % migration by providing employment to the villagers. 

Table no. 52: Details of seasonal migration from Project area 

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration 

Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project 

1 Kharetha 135 34 3 month 0 

2 Kund 15 0 3 month 0 

3 Vandarveli 25 0 3 month 0 

4 Valpor 90 0 3 month 0 

5 Galiba 135 34 3 month 0 

6 Fichvada 55 0 3 month 0 

7 Rupghat 60 0 3 month 0 

8 Sankoi 110 28 3 month 0 

9 Varkhadi 75 0 3 month 0 


6.1.3 Ground water table 

Due to the Moderate Slope / Hilly soil, ground water table is very low 40-45m. Proper soil and water conservation activities, ground 

water table would increase upto 37-40 m. 

Table no. 53: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) 

S. No. Name of Project Sources Pre-Project level 

Expected Increase/decrease (Post- 

Project) 

1 Sankoi (IWMP-1) Open wells 40 to 45 37 to 40 

6.1.4 Drinking water 

People use handpump, bore well and river for drinking purpose. These structures provide only 9-10 month water to the villagers 

regularly. But in the summer season, villagers face a lot of problem. Water quality is also not good. After the project, villagers can get all over the 

year drinking water near by house with good quality. 

Table no. 54: Status of Drinking water 

Sr. No. 

Names of Villages 

Availability of drinking water 

Quality of drinking water 

(no. of months in a year) 

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project 

1 Sankoi (IWMP-1) 9 12 contaminated Pure 


6.1.5 Crops 

All agriculture activities are specially based on monsoon. In the Sankoi project, due to the Moderate Slope / Hilly land agriculture 

productivity of the crops is very less. Farmers don't use proper farming pattern in their field also. There is no irrigation facility for the 

cultivation of the crops which is directly affected of the crop yield. Due to the erosion (gully and rill), fertility of the land is low. 

Project would increase the productivity of the crops by proving proper irrigation facility to the farmers as well as the different training 

programmes for new farming technology by crop demonstration and distributing High yielding varieties seeds to the farmers. Fertility of the 

land would increase by using vermi-compost and proper cropping pattern in the land. Erosion would be decreased by constructing different soil 

and water conservation measures. 

Table no. 55: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas 

Name of village 

Name of crops 

Pre-project 

Expected Post -Project 

Area(ha) Average Yield per ha (qtl) Area(ha) Average Yield per ha (qtl) 

Kharetha 

Kund 

Kharif 

Tuvar 91 6.4 91 12 

Cotton 69 6.4 69 12.5 

Rice 28 5.6 28 11 

Village total 188 18.4 188 35.5 

Kharif 

Tuvar 23 6.4 23 10.4 

Cotton 11 6.4 11 11.2 

Rice 6 5.6 6 9 

Village total 40 18.4 40 30.6 


Vanderveli 

Valpor 

Galiba 

Fichwada 

Kharif 

Tuvar 27 7.2 27 11 

Cotton 9 7.2 9 11.5 

Rice 7 6.4 7 9.5 

Rabi 

Juvar 15 5.6 15 8.5 

Wheat 5 5.6 5 9.5 

Village total 63 32 63 50 

Kharif 

Tuvar 87 8 87 12 

Cotton 48 7.2 48 13.2 

Rice 31 6.4 31 9.5 

Juvar 5 6.4 5 11 

Wheat 1.75 5.6 1.75 9.5 

Village total 172.75 33.6 172.75 55.2 

Rabi 

Kharif 

Tuvar 104 7.2 104 11.5 

Cotton 78 7.2 78 12.3 

Rice 37 6.8 37 9.8 

Juvar 6 6.4 6 12 

Wheat 2 4.8 2 8.5 

Village total 227 32.4 227 54.1 

Rabi 

Kharif 

Tuvar 38 6.4 38 12 

Cotton 26 6.4 26 11.5 

Rice 15 6.4 15 11.7 

Village total 79 19.2 79 35.2 


Rupghat 

Sankoi 

Varkhadi 

Kharif 

Tuvar 167 8 167 15 

Cotton 105 8 105 14.9 

Rice 69 7.2 69 13.9 

Rabi 

Juvar 6 6.4 6 9.5 

Wheat 1 6.4 1 11 

Zaid NA NA 

Village total 342 20 342 34.4 

Kharif 

Tuvar 35 6.4 35 12 

Cotton 24 7.2 24 13 

Rice 14 6.4 14 12 

Village total 73 20 73 37 

Kharif 

Tuvar 109 7.2 109 14 

Cotton 56 6.4 56 11.5 

Rice 25 6.8 25 11 

Rabi 

Juvar 1.5 4.8 1.5 8.5 

Wheat 0.5 4.8 0.5 8.5 

Zaid NA NA 

Village total 192 30 192 53.5 


Table no. 56: Area under horticulture 

Sr. No. 

Name of Village 

Existing area under horticulture 

(ha) 

Area under horticulture proposed to be 

covered through IWMP 

1 Kharetha 2.00 6.25 

2 Kund 0.50 3.90 

3 Vandarveli 1.50 6.45 

4 Valpor 1.00 3.75 

5 Galiba 3.98 14.33 

6 Fichvada 1.00 3.95 

7 Rupghat 3.30 9.38 

8 Sankoi 4.96 15.04 

9 Varkhadi 1.00 3.83 

Total 19.24 66.88 

6.1.7 Vegetative cover 

Project covers about 50% area under vegetative cover. In the project area nilgiri, bamboo, subabool,neem, tik and mahua can be seen 

anywhere. Project would cover 3661.01 ha area through farm forestry, fuel and timber plantation and fruit tree plantation. 

Table no. 57: Forest/vegetative cover 

Sr. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed 

1 Kharetha 450 47.50 

2 Kund 140 26.10 

3 Vandarveli 259 48.10 

4 Valpor 95 36.70 

5 Galiba 595.12 77.90 

6 Fichvada 200.55 58.90 

7 Rupghat 50.68 47.10 

8 Sankoi 114.33 82.00 

9 Varkhadi 70.89 38.40 

Total 1975.57 462.70 


6.1.8 Livestock 

Project area covers milch animal like cow and buffaloes, drought animals, small ruminants and hens. Different activities like providing 

good quality cows and buffaloes, goat unit, poultry farming, provide fodder by establishment of fodder bank, veterinary services etc. It is 

expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in livestock population and yield from them. 

Table no. 58: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and 

income in Rs.) 

S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal 

Milch-animals 

Pre-Project 

Expected Post-project 

No. Yield Income No. Yield Income 

Remarks 

Cow (per animal/day) 185 2 16 222 3.5 20 

1 Kharetha 

Buffalo(per animal/day) 45 3 20 54 5 25 

Draught Purpose animals 

NA 

Animals for other purpose 

Goat 150 180 180 180 

Hen 27 120 33 120 

Milch-animals 



2 Kund 



NA 

Goat 35 180 42 180 

Hen 25 120 30 120 


Milch-animals 



3 Vanderveli 


NA 


Goat 55 180 66 180 

Hen 70 120 84 120 

Milch-animals 



4 Valpor 


NA 


Goat 62 180 75 180 

Hen 75 120 90 120 

Milch-animals 



5 Galiba 


NA 


Goat 115 180 138 180 

Hen 100 120 120 120 


Milch-animals 



6 Fichwada 



NA 

Goat 80 180 96 180 

Hen 85 120 102 120 

Milch-animals 



7 Rupghat 



NA 

Goat 50 180 60 180 

Hen 102 120 123 120 

Milch-animals 



8 Sankoi 



NA 

Goat 70 180 84 180 

Hen 79 120 95 120 


Milch-animals 



9 Varkhadi 


NA 


Goat 90 180 108 180 

Hen 57 120 69 120 


6.1.9 Linkages 

The direct livelihood activities need good forward and backward support. Without such support system the activities may fail to deliver 

the desired results. These linkages would involve credit, machinery, input supply, marketing, etc. 

Table no. 59: Backward-Forward linkages 

S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility 

Pre-project 

(no.) 

During the project (no.) Post-project (no.) 

Backward linkages 

Seed certification 

Seed supply system 1 1 

Fertilizer supply system 1 1 

Pesticide supply system 1 1 

Credit institutions Bank Bank 

1 

IWMP -II 

Vasana 

Water supply 

Extension services 

KVK Chaswad,Akrsp - KVK Chaswad,Akrsp - 

Netrang 

Netrang 

Nurseries 1 1 

Tools/machinery suppliers 1 1 

Price Support system 

Labour 

Any other (please specify) 

Forward linkages 

Harvesting/threshing machinery 1 1 

Storage (including cold storage) 

Y 

Road network 

Y 

Transport facilities 

Y 

Markets / Mandis 

Y 

Agro and other Industries 

Milk and other collection centres Y 1 

Labour 

Any other (please specify) Vermi compost unit Vermi compost unit 


Logical Framework Analysis 

Components Activities Outputs Effect 

Village 

Institution 

Formation 

Formation of Watershed 

Committee, User Group and SHGs 

One Watershed Committee in each 

village 

Project can be implemented and 

managed in a democratic and 

participatory way ensuring equity. 

Number of User groups depending on 

Strengthening 

Village 

Institutions 

Organize training and awareness 

programme for Village institutions 

Capacity building workshops and 

exposure visits User Group, SHGs 

and Watershed Committee 

Facilitating and monitoring the 

functioning of UGs and WCs 

Strengthen linkages between UGs 

and WCs and Panchayat 

Institutions. 

Gender sensitization in WC, UGs, 

SHGs. 

the coverage of particular intervention 

Awareness camps to be organized. 

Trainings and exposure visits UGs and 

WCs to be held 

Capacity building workshops to be 

organized 

Quality management of common 

resources will improve. 

Quality product among people will be 

improved. 

Increased awareness amongst women 

about village resources. 

Fund 

Management 

Sensitise village communities to 

involve children and youth in 

development. 

Improve management and 

utilisation of UGs, SHGs and WCs. 

Prepare communities to explore 

other sources of income for UGs, 

SHGs and others. 

Involvement of youth and children in 

village development work. 

UGs, SHGs and WCs operating bank 

account and managing resources on 

their own 

Women participation enhanced in 

decision-making of GVCs. 

Purpose, frequency and volume of use 

of the fund enhanced. 

Volume of funds generated for UGs, 

SHGs and WCs from other sources of 

income increased. 


Ecological 

Restoration 

Rainfed Area 

Development 

Protection, treatment and 

regeneration of common and 

private resources. 

Plantation of fruits and forest 

species 

Treatment of land through 

improved soil and moisture 

conservation practices on 

watershed basis 

Construct water harvesting 

structures for conserving water on 

rainy season. 

Promotion of good agricultural 

practices- horticulture, improved 

crop and vegetable 

Common and private lands to be 

brought under new plantations and 

agro-horti-forestry like Neem, Babool, 

Drum stick, Mahua, Mango and Sapota 

etc. 

Trainings, exposure visits and meetings 

to be organized for communities, village 

volunteers and staff 

Land to be brought under improved soil 

moisture conservation practices 

Water can be conserve for a long time. 

Good agricultural practices to be 

promoted. 

Fodder availability from common and 

private lands increased. 

Money saving from purchasing of 

Domestic products. 

Other micro-enterprise activities can 

be used at domestic level. 

Improved productivity of treated land 

Increased availability of water in wells, 

pond and checkdam. 

Increase in annual agriculture 

production 

Promotion of organic farming 

practices 

Organic farming to be promoted 

Farmers adopt organic farming 

practices. 

Formation of Fodder banks to 

increase fodder security and 

promote dairy development among 

communities 

Identification and promotion of 

agri-produce based income 

generation activities like grading, 

processing and packaging. 

Fodder banks to be established 

Agriculture based livelihood income 

generation activities to be promoted 

Use of domestic product properly 

Fodder security of farmers enhanced. 


Promotion of better Irrigation 

practices like drip irrigation 

Water harvesting structures to be 

constructed. 

Increase availability of water for 12 

months 

Drip and Lift irrigation facilities to be 

distributed among farmers 

Increased availability of water for 

livestock 

Availability of irrigation water 

established 

Farmers take two or three crops in a 

year 

Increase in agricultural productivity of 

land 

Availability of drinking water 

enhanced 

Women’s Sociopolitical 

and 

economic 

empowerment 

Impart trainings, conduct meetings 

and organise exposure visits of 

communities, village volunteers and 

staff to effectively plan, execute and 

monitor activities 

Formation & Strengthening of 

women’s SHG groups 

Capacity building of womenfolk 

Linking SHGs with external financial 

institutions 

Trainings, exposure visits and meetings 

to be organized for communities, village 

volunteers and staff 

Women’s SHG groups to be formed 

Federation of Women’s SHGs to be 

formed 

Enhanced capacities of leaders of 

women's group in taking initiatives to 

solve problems at different levels. 

Increased household income. 


CHAPTER -7 

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES 

6. Quality and Sustainability Issues 

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation 

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The 

system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of 

Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil 

type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, 

irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from 

the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance 

viz., already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would 

also show the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate 

the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the 

planners and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project. 

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground 

staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up 

official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works 


in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during 

the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is 

reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by 

means of summarized reports generated over frequent periods of time. 

7.2 Plans for Project management: 

The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the 

village level institutes. In Sankoi project, watershed committee, various user groups and SHGs have been formulated for post project operation 

and maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after 

implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will 

act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project. 

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: 

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will 

comes mainly fund the following: 

7.4 User Charges: 

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed 

during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. The secretary of watershed 

committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following. 


Figure-8.1: Ground water map 

Chapter-8 

Map 


Figure-8.2: Land use map 


Figure-8.3: River water body map 


Figure-8.4: Slope map 


Figure-8.5: Soil map 


Figure-8.6: Geomorphology map 


Figure-8.7: Baseline map 


Figure-8.8: Action plan map

IWMP-1 - Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat State

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?