18.06.2014 Views

Volume 24 - The Society for the Advancement of Anaesthesia in ...

Volume 24 - The Society for the Advancement of Anaesthesia in ...

Volume 24 - The Society for the Advancement of Anaesthesia in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SAAD DENTAL NURSE PRIZE WINNER<br />

• identification <strong>of</strong> a particular aspect <strong>of</strong> practice – <strong>in</strong> this<br />

case PONV <strong>in</strong> dental patients<br />

Table 1<br />

Risk assessment tool<br />

(Used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Oral and Facial Surgery)<br />

• assessment <strong>of</strong> how that practice is carried out, i.e.<br />

assessment prior to surgery (Table 1), measur<strong>in</strong>g PONV<br />

recovery scores (Table 2) and record<strong>in</strong>g usage <strong>of</strong> antiemetics<br />

CATEGORY<br />

SCORE<br />

FEMALE 1<br />

NON-SMOKER 1<br />

PREVIOUS PONV 1<br />

MOTION SICKNESS 1<br />

OPIOIDS GIVEN 1<br />

Table 2<br />

Post-recovery score<br />

(Used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Oral and Facial Surgery)<br />

ADMISSION<br />

TO RECOVERY<br />

AFTER<br />

30 MINUTES<br />

ON DISCHARGE<br />

NO NAUSEA OR VOMITING 0 0 0<br />

MILD NAUSEA, NO VOMITING 1 1 1<br />

MODERATE NAUSEA AND/OR OCCASIONAL VOMITING 2 2 2<br />

SEVERE NAUSEA AND/OR FREQUENT VOMITING 3 3 3<br />

• judgement by peer review as to whe<strong>the</strong>r certa<strong>in</strong> standards<br />

are be<strong>in</strong>g met, i.e. decid<strong>in</strong>g that more than 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients suffer<strong>in</strong>g severe nausea is an unacceptable level<br />

• identification <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>for</strong> improvement<br />

• address<strong>in</strong>g any deficiencies, i.e. education <strong>of</strong> nurses,<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> protocols<br />

• reassessment after a period <strong>of</strong> time to check that<br />

practice has improved.<br />

Audit carried out by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Oral and Facial Surgery <strong>in</strong> 2005<br />

Total number <strong>of</strong> patients<br />

(day case) 237<br />

Males<br />

77 (32.4%)<br />

Females<br />

160 (87.5%)<br />

Time <strong>of</strong> surgery<br />

PONV details<br />

Exodontic dentistry<br />

182 cases<br />

Mean age<br />

PONV risk score<br />

Total PONV <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

Nausea <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

Vomit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

Males<br />

40 (21.9%)<br />

7.54 yrs<br />

2<br />

Females<br />

142 (87.5%)<br />

8.33 yrs<br />

2<br />

20 m<strong>in</strong>s<br />

4.39%<br />

2.7%<br />

1.6%<br />

Restorative dentistry<br />

55 cases<br />

Mean age<br />

Total PONV <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

Nausea <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

37<br />

21<br />

18<br />

23<br />

1–2 hrs<br />

23.7%<br />

14.6%<br />

9.1%<br />

SAAD DIGEST | VOL.<strong>24</strong> | JANUARY 2008 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!