19.06.2014 Views

the Mpingo Conservation Project - Coastal Forests of Kenya and ...

the Mpingo Conservation Project - Coastal Forests of Kenya and ...

the Mpingo Conservation Project - Coastal Forests of Kenya and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The <strong>Mpingo</strong> <strong>Conservation</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />

Final Draft<br />

<strong>Mpingo</strong> Survey 2000 Full Report<br />

Results<br />

canopy cover. O<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned case <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> riverine plots, unburnt plots with a high (51-<br />

75%) canopy cover is a possible peak, but this is also insignificant (t = -1.01, df = 154, p > 10%),<br />

perhaps due to a low sample size. The general character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> graph, showing higher mpingo density<br />

in medium to high canopy cover areas is better explained in terms <strong>of</strong> mpingo frequency ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

density, see below.<br />

4.0<br />

Mean <strong>Mpingo</strong> Density (trees per ha)<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

Unburnt<br />

Burned<br />

Riverine<br />

0.0<br />

Low (0-25%) Medium (26-50%) High (51-75%) Total (76-100%)<br />

Canopy Cover<br />

Figure 4. Variation in adult mpingo density in plots in site strata 2 & 3 according to different classes <strong>of</strong> canopy cover,<br />

showing variation by plot type. Excludes outlying plot at Mkoka with 7 mpingo, next maximum was 3.<br />

All <strong>the</strong> adult mpingo were seen in plots with a canopy height <strong>of</strong> between 5m <strong>and</strong> 15m. The number<br />

seen showed a marked jump between 7m <strong>and</strong> 10m canopy height, but this range also accounted for a<br />

large number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plots surveyed as Figure 5 makes clear.<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

Cumulative Frequency<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

<strong>Mpingo</strong><br />

Plots<br />

0%<br />

0 5 10 15 20<br />

Canopy Height (m)<br />

Figure 5. Comparative cumulative frequency <strong>of</strong> mpingo seen <strong>and</strong> plots surveyed by canopy height.<br />

Page 16 <strong>of</strong> 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!