20.06.2014 Views

About This Book

About This Book

About This Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

186 PRACTICING ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT, 2ND EDITION<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Doing this study was a very rewarding and educational experience. Having the<br />

opportunity to communicate with so many leaders in the field about important<br />

issues in OD was more than one with a passion for OD could hope for, and to<br />

see the effort that so many put into answering the questions was humbling to<br />

say the least. Clearly I could spend a great deal of time analyzing and learning<br />

from the results.<br />

What is important, however, is that this study makes at least a small contribution<br />

to developing a better understanding of the field of organization development.<br />

My hope is not so much that others will agree with the findings but<br />

that the findings will stimulate rich discussions and additional studies that will<br />

add clarity to the field.<br />

In evaluating the results, I have concluded that OD is alive and well, but is<br />

struggling through many important issues in adapting to the times and being relevant<br />

for changing organizational needs. In one sense this could be said of any<br />

field such as HR that addresses organizational issues. However, the time to adapt<br />

is shorter than in previous times and the stakes are higher, as the fields that do<br />

not adapt will be marginal players in the future if they are players at all. The sense<br />

of urgency will, I hope, awaken leaders in OD who will play key roles in articulating<br />

the importance of OD, adapting OD to changing times, accelerating OD<br />

processes and methods, and developing new theories, methods, and applications.<br />

Another conclusion is that there may be more agreement on the fundamentals<br />

and values of OD than many people think. Different experts may say things<br />

in different ways and, yes, there are areas of disagreement and different perspectives,<br />

as you would expect in any field. However, when it comes to the<br />

essentials, OD is not as complex and confusing as we often make it. Again, this<br />

may be a challenge for leaders in OD to simplify and clarify the field and to do<br />

a better job of articulating the value of OD.<br />

Finally, having done this study, I have developed an even greater respect for<br />

the pioneers who launched a new field that has been such a valuable contributor<br />

to what we know about change and how to build healthy, high performance<br />

organizations. I urge those who have carried on and added to the<br />

pioneers’ legacy to stay the course in diligently practicing and training others in<br />

OD, in hopes that they and others will be re-energized to further develop and<br />

promote this valuable field.<br />

References<br />

Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models. Reading, MA:<br />

Addison-Wesley.<br />

Beer, M. (1980). Organization change and development. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!