20.06.2014 Views

Untitled - Saigontre

Untitled - Saigontre

Untitled - Saigontre

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Refining the Program<br />

159<br />

bad, good performers who are not presently identified as successors for key<br />

positions may grow disenchanted and demotivated, even though they may<br />

already be demonstrating that they have that potential. A poorly handled communication<br />

strategy can lead to increases in avoidable or critical turnover,<br />

thereby costing the organization precious talent and driving up training costs.<br />

Choosing Effective Approaches<br />

As part of the SP&M program, decision-makers should review how the organization<br />

has historically communicated about succession issues—and consider<br />

how it should communicate about them. Establishing a consistent communication<br />

strategy is vital.<br />

Valuable clues about the organization’s historical communication strategy<br />

may be found in how key job incumbents were treated previously and how<br />

wage and salary matters are handled. If key job incumbents did not know that<br />

they were designated successors before they were eligible for advancement or<br />

if the organization’s practice is not to publish salary schedules, then it is likely<br />

that a ‘‘closed’’ communication strategy is preferred. That means information<br />

is kept secret, and successors are not alerted to their status. On the other<br />

hand, if key job incumbents did know that they were designated successors<br />

before they were promoted or if salary schedules are published, then an<br />

‘‘open’’ communication strategy is preferred. That means people are treated<br />

with candor.<br />

Choose an approach to communication based on the preferences of decision-makers.<br />

If their preferences seem unclear, ask questions to discover what<br />

they are:<br />

▲ How, if at all, should employees be informed about the SP&M program?<br />

(For instance, should the mission statement and/or policy and procedures<br />

on SP&M be circulated?)<br />

▲ How should the organization characterize the roles of employee performance<br />

appraisal, individual potential assessment, and individual development<br />

planning in SP&M?<br />

▲ How should decisions about individual selection, promotion, demotion,<br />

transfer, or development in place be explained to those who ask?<br />

▲ What problems will result from informing individuals about their status<br />

in succession plans? From not informing them?<br />

▲ What problems will result from informing employees about the SP&M<br />

program? What problems will result from not informing them?<br />

Ultimately, the organization should choose a communication policy that is<br />

consistent with the answers to the questions above. Often the best approach<br />

is to communicate openly about the SP&M program in general, but conceal<br />

the basis for individual personnel actions in line with good business practice

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!