European Ocean Research Fleets - uefiscdi
European Ocean Research Fleets - uefiscdi
European Ocean Research Fleets - uefiscdi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
© NIOZ<br />
© Ifremer<br />
Calypso Long Corer on RV Marion Dufresne<br />
A2.4.3. Annual programming<br />
The agencies from different <strong>European</strong> countries have<br />
different planning horizons. Some countries plan in<br />
detail two or even three years ahead whereas others<br />
need only one year. This makes it diffi cult to commit<br />
facilities for pooled use when domestic requirements<br />
have not yet been fully established. Some progress<br />
was made recently when it was agreed to accept the<br />
calendar year (January to December) as the yearly unit<br />
programme duration. Operators now need to extend<br />
this timescale to two year programmes in order<br />
to provide an opportunity to plan equipment exchanges.<br />
Data utilisation for each instrument also has<br />
to be produced and made more widely available in order<br />
to identify potential spare capacity. The <strong>European</strong><br />
<strong>Research</strong> Vessel Operators group (ERVO (6) ) would be<br />
an appropriate forum to develop this topic further.<br />
A2.4.4. Cooperation outside Europe<br />
<strong>European</strong> fleet managers work closely with non-<strong>European</strong><br />
partners such as Australia, Canada, China, India,<br />
Japan, New Zealand, the United States of America and<br />
others through the International <strong>Research</strong> Ship Operator<br />
Meeting (ISOM (7) ) group that has existed for almost<br />
20 years. This cooperation shows that some institutions<br />
outside Europe own and operate instruments and<br />
equipment which can be used and may be needed by<br />
<strong>European</strong> institutions as well.<br />
6 ERVO: Marine Board-ESF Working Group since 1999<br />
7 ISOM: www.isom-info.org<br />
An example of interoperability: ROV Victor 6000 on board<br />
RV Polarstern<br />
Bilateral agreements between <strong>European</strong> and<br />
non-<strong>European</strong> institutions regarding large and exchangeable<br />
instruments already exist; such cooperative<br />
arrangements are likely to be increased in<br />
the future.<br />
A2.4.5. Insurance<br />
<strong>European</strong> governments have different approaches regarding<br />
the insurance of equipment. Some owners get<br />
regular insurances on all types of equipment. Therefore<br />
users have to pay only for the insurance of the related<br />
equipment to facilitate a lend or a lease. Other<br />
owners are not allowed to insure their equipment with<br />
a private insurance company and must therefore pay<br />
for the replacement of lost equipment (out of their ordinary<br />
budgets) or ask for an extra grant from the owner<br />
of the institute. In these cases, the willingness to lend<br />
or lease expensive instruments to others is often, not<br />
surprisingly, very limited.<br />
A common policy for the insurance of large and<br />
exchangeable instruments across Europe would<br />
therefore be most welcome.<br />
A2.4.6. Transport costs and customs duties<br />
Moving large instruments over national territories is<br />
also a very complex, time-consuming and costly operation.<br />
Joint ownership and common use of instruments<br />
should therefore be encouraged between countries<br />
where the cost for transportation appears reasonable.<br />
Another challenge concerns customs duties and the<br />
Value Added Tax (VAT) issues when equipment cross-<br />
<strong>European</strong> <strong>Ocean</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Fleets</strong> | 21