24.06.2014 Views

European Ocean Research Fleets - uefiscdi

European Ocean Research Fleets - uefiscdi

European Ocean Research Fleets - uefiscdi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

© NIOZ<br />

© Ifremer<br />

Calypso Long Corer on RV Marion Dufresne<br />

A2.4.3. Annual programming<br />

The agencies from different <strong>European</strong> countries have<br />

different planning horizons. Some countries plan in<br />

detail two or even three years ahead whereas others<br />

need only one year. This makes it diffi cult to commit<br />

facilities for pooled use when domestic requirements<br />

have not yet been fully established. Some progress<br />

was made recently when it was agreed to accept the<br />

calendar year (January to December) as the yearly unit<br />

programme duration. Operators now need to extend<br />

this timescale to two year programmes in order<br />

to provide an opportunity to plan equipment exchanges.<br />

Data utilisation for each instrument also has<br />

to be produced and made more widely available in order<br />

to identify potential spare capacity. The <strong>European</strong><br />

<strong>Research</strong> Vessel Operators group (ERVO (6) ) would be<br />

an appropriate forum to develop this topic further.<br />

A2.4.4. Cooperation outside Europe<br />

<strong>European</strong> fleet managers work closely with non-<strong>European</strong><br />

partners such as Australia, Canada, China, India,<br />

Japan, New Zealand, the United States of America and<br />

others through the International <strong>Research</strong> Ship Operator<br />

Meeting (ISOM (7) ) group that has existed for almost<br />

20 years. This cooperation shows that some institutions<br />

outside Europe own and operate instruments and<br />

equipment which can be used and may be needed by<br />

<strong>European</strong> institutions as well.<br />

6 ERVO: Marine Board-ESF Working Group since 1999<br />

7 ISOM: www.isom-info.org<br />

An example of interoperability: ROV Victor 6000 on board<br />

RV Polarstern<br />

Bilateral agreements between <strong>European</strong> and<br />

non-<strong>European</strong> institutions regarding large and exchangeable<br />

instruments already exist; such cooperative<br />

arrangements are likely to be increased in<br />

the future.<br />

A2.4.5. Insurance<br />

<strong>European</strong> governments have different approaches regarding<br />

the insurance of equipment. Some owners get<br />

regular insurances on all types of equipment. Therefore<br />

users have to pay only for the insurance of the related<br />

equipment to facilitate a lend or a lease. Other<br />

owners are not allowed to insure their equipment with<br />

a private insurance company and must therefore pay<br />

for the replacement of lost equipment (out of their ordinary<br />

budgets) or ask for an extra grant from the owner<br />

of the institute. In these cases, the willingness to lend<br />

or lease expensive instruments to others is often, not<br />

surprisingly, very limited.<br />

A common policy for the insurance of large and<br />

exchangeable instruments across Europe would<br />

therefore be most welcome.<br />

A2.4.6. Transport costs and customs duties<br />

Moving large instruments over national territories is<br />

also a very complex, time-consuming and costly operation.<br />

Joint ownership and common use of instruments<br />

should therefore be encouraged between countries<br />

where the cost for transportation appears reasonable.<br />

Another challenge concerns customs duties and the<br />

Value Added Tax (VAT) issues when equipment cross-<br />

<strong>European</strong> <strong>Ocean</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>Fleets</strong> | 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!