29.06.2014 Views

Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...

Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...

Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.42 Local authorities raised a number of issues in their responses including:<br />

the potential cost;<br />

the risks of challenge if the objectives were unclear; and<br />

whether the community group is representative.<br />

5.43 <strong>The</strong> risk of challenge if a compulsory purchase order is seen to favour the<br />

interests of one party over another was also raised by the private sector.<br />

5.44 Several points were made regarding any potential legislation:<br />

Reference was made to the current review of compulsory purchase law<br />

by the <strong>Scottish</strong> Law Commission. It was suggested that it would be<br />

useful to await the findings.<br />

Current legislation might need strengthened to make “community<br />

benefit” a ground for compulsory purchase - or the “well-being” ground<br />

introduced in England should be considered.<br />

5.45 Some examples of good practice under the existing arrangements were also<br />

noted:<br />

“... progressive local authorities ... are working with<br />

communities to purchase, protect and hold in trust assets on<br />

behalf of communities. Glasgow City Council’s acquisition of<br />

the former St Margaret’s Church in Oatlands being a good<br />

example.”<br />

(Link Group)<br />

5.46 A minority of respondents gave their views on what issues (in addition to<br />

existing legal requirements) would have to be considered when developing<br />

any “right to request” compulsory purchase.<br />

5.47 Issues not previously highlighted included:<br />

the need for a clearly agreed end use;<br />

the need for a robust business plan and the capacity to deliver it;<br />

legitimacy (of the project and organisation), and appropriate governance<br />

arrangements on the part of the community group; and<br />

the need for an agreed ‘exit strategy, if the project failed at a future date.<br />

5.48 Respondents suggested that there should be a duty on the part of local<br />

authorities to consider any request and to give reasons for any decision to<br />

decline a request. Safeguards in the event of vexatious or self-interested<br />

requests were also mentioned as potentially being required. Many<br />

respondents acknowledged that compulsory purchase should be seen as a<br />

last resort.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!