Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...
Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...
Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5.42 Local authorities raised a number of issues in their responses including:<br />
the potential cost;<br />
the risks of challenge if the objectives were unclear; and<br />
whether the community group is representative.<br />
5.43 <strong>The</strong> risk of challenge if a compulsory purchase order is seen to favour the<br />
interests of one party over another was also raised by the private sector.<br />
5.44 Several points were made regarding any potential legislation:<br />
Reference was made to the current review of compulsory purchase law<br />
by the <strong>Scottish</strong> Law Commission. It was suggested that it would be<br />
useful to await the findings.<br />
Current legislation might need strengthened to make “community<br />
benefit” a ground for compulsory purchase - or the “well-being” ground<br />
introduced in England should be considered.<br />
5.45 Some examples of good practice under the existing arrangements were also<br />
noted:<br />
“... progressive local authorities ... are working with<br />
communities to purchase, protect and hold in trust assets on<br />
behalf of communities. Glasgow City Council’s acquisition of<br />
the former St Margaret’s Church in Oatlands being a good<br />
example.”<br />
(Link Group)<br />
5.46 A minority of respondents gave their views on what issues (in addition to<br />
existing legal requirements) would have to be considered when developing<br />
any “right to request” compulsory purchase.<br />
5.47 Issues not previously highlighted included:<br />
the need for a clearly agreed end use;<br />
the need for a robust business plan and the capacity to deliver it;<br />
legitimacy (of the project and organisation), and appropriate governance<br />
arrangements on the part of the community group; and<br />
the need for an agreed ‘exit strategy, if the project failed at a future date.<br />
5.48 Respondents suggested that there should be a duty on the part of local<br />
authorities to consider any request and to give reasons for any decision to<br />
decline a request. Safeguards in the event of vexatious or self-interested<br />
requests were also mentioned as potentially being required. Many<br />
respondents acknowledged that compulsory purchase should be seen as a<br />
last resort.<br />
97