29.06.2014 Views

Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...

Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...

Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.73 <strong>Scottish</strong> Borders Council highlighted that its TSI - Borders Third Sector<br />

Partnership – played a key role in organising representation of the interests of<br />

the third sector in the community planning process. Through this and other<br />

community capacity building support for individual third sector organisations, it<br />

is well placed to further develop the participation of communities in the<br />

<strong>Community</strong> Planning process. Local authorities provided other examples of<br />

good practice in relation to TSIs.<br />

3.74 Glasgow Housing Association commented that although the TSI is relatively<br />

new in Glasgow it appeared to be working well. As a third sector organisation, it<br />

believed that third sector organisations did have a key role to play in engaging<br />

communities of ‘interest’ and ‘geography’ in the <strong>Community</strong> Planning process.<br />

3.75 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Scottish</strong> <strong>Community</strong> Development Centre provided an alternative view<br />

stating that although the recently established TSIs provided a clear platform for<br />

third sector representation, their effectiveness would be conditioned by the<br />

relationships the representatives had with their local constituencies and their<br />

level of capacity to represent a range of views and priorities.<br />

3.76 In contrast, a number of respondents (particularly community councils,<br />

individuals and other community organisations) were more sceptical about the<br />

role of the third sector in supporting the participation of communities in the<br />

community planning process. It was clear from these responses that<br />

respondents had quite different views on what they understood the third sector<br />

to be.<br />

3.77 A number of respondents (particularly among other community organisations)<br />

felt that the third sector was too ‘diverse’ and ‘disparate’ and could not be<br />

expected to represent the ‘voice’ of the community. In this respect, some<br />

respondents underlined the importance of ensuring accountability to the wider<br />

community (geographical or interest) is evidenced.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> ‘third sector’ is multi-faceted in character and third sector<br />

organisations range from small community groups to large,<br />

national charities. As such the idea of having a ‘third sector’<br />

representative within <strong>Community</strong> Planning structures is unlikely to<br />

deliver an expanded role for third sector and community<br />

organisations in the future delivery of public services.”<br />

(Development Trusts Association Scotland)<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!