Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...
Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...
Consultation On The Proposed Community Empowerment - Scottish ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.73 <strong>Scottish</strong> Borders Council highlighted that its TSI - Borders Third Sector<br />
Partnership – played a key role in organising representation of the interests of<br />
the third sector in the community planning process. Through this and other<br />
community capacity building support for individual third sector organisations, it<br />
is well placed to further develop the participation of communities in the<br />
<strong>Community</strong> Planning process. Local authorities provided other examples of<br />
good practice in relation to TSIs.<br />
3.74 Glasgow Housing Association commented that although the TSI is relatively<br />
new in Glasgow it appeared to be working well. As a third sector organisation, it<br />
believed that third sector organisations did have a key role to play in engaging<br />
communities of ‘interest’ and ‘geography’ in the <strong>Community</strong> Planning process.<br />
3.75 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Scottish</strong> <strong>Community</strong> Development Centre provided an alternative view<br />
stating that although the recently established TSIs provided a clear platform for<br />
third sector representation, their effectiveness would be conditioned by the<br />
relationships the representatives had with their local constituencies and their<br />
level of capacity to represent a range of views and priorities.<br />
3.76 In contrast, a number of respondents (particularly community councils,<br />
individuals and other community organisations) were more sceptical about the<br />
role of the third sector in supporting the participation of communities in the<br />
community planning process. It was clear from these responses that<br />
respondents had quite different views on what they understood the third sector<br />
to be.<br />
3.77 A number of respondents (particularly among other community organisations)<br />
felt that the third sector was too ‘diverse’ and ‘disparate’ and could not be<br />
expected to represent the ‘voice’ of the community. In this respect, some<br />
respondents underlined the importance of ensuring accountability to the wider<br />
community (geographical or interest) is evidenced.<br />
“<strong>The</strong> ‘third sector’ is multi-faceted in character and third sector<br />
organisations range from small community groups to large,<br />
national charities. As such the idea of having a ‘third sector’<br />
representative within <strong>Community</strong> Planning structures is unlikely to<br />
deliver an expanded role for third sector and community<br />
organisations in the future delivery of public services.”<br />
(Development Trusts Association Scotland)<br />
35