29.06.2014 Views

Sentiment Analysis based on Appraisal Theory and Functional Local ...

Sentiment Analysis based on Appraisal Theory and Functional Local ...

Sentiment Analysis based on Appraisal Theory and Functional Local ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

19<br />

Affect [2, 3, 20, 110, 156] c<strong>on</strong>cerns the emoti<strong>on</strong>s that people feel, whether in<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>se to a trigger or not, whether positive, negative, or neither (e.g. surprise).<br />

Affect <strong>and</strong> evaluati<strong>on</strong> have a lot of overlap, in that positive <strong>and</strong> negative emoti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

triggered by a particular trigger often c<strong>on</strong>stitute an evaluati<strong>on</strong> of that trigger [110].<br />

Because of this, affect is always included in studies of evaluati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> particular<br />

frameworks for classifying different types of affect (e.g. appraisal theory [110]) are<br />

particularly well suited for evaluati<strong>on</strong> tasks. Affect can also have applicati<strong>on</strong>s outside<br />

of evaluati<strong>on</strong>, in fields like human-computer interacti<strong>on</strong> [3, 189, 190], <strong>and</strong> also in<br />

applicati<strong>on</strong>s outside of text analysis. Alm [3], for example, focused <strong>on</strong> identifying<br />

spans of text in stories which c<strong>on</strong>veyed particular emoti<strong>on</strong>s, so that a computerized<br />

storyteller could vocalize those secti<strong>on</strong>s of a story with appropriately dramatic voices.<br />

Her framework for dealing with affect involved identifying the emoti<strong>on</strong>s “angry”,<br />

“disgusted”, “fearful”, “happy”, “sad”, <strong>and</strong> “surprised.” These emoti<strong>on</strong> types are<br />

motivated (appropriately for the task) by the fact that they should be vocalized<br />

differently from each other, but because this framework lacks a unified c<strong>on</strong>cept of<br />

positive <strong>and</strong> negative emoti<strong>on</strong>s, it would not be appropriate for studying evaluative<br />

language.<br />

There are many other n<strong>on</strong>-objective aspects of texts that are interesting for<br />

different applicati<strong>on</strong>s in the field of sentiment analysis, <strong>and</strong> a blanket term for these<br />

n<strong>on</strong>-objective aspects of texts is “subjectivity”. The most general studies of subjectivity<br />

have focused <strong>on</strong> how “private states”, internal states that can’t be observed<br />

directly by others, are expressed [174, 179].<br />

More specific aspects of subjectivity<br />

include predictive opini<strong>on</strong>s [90], speculati<strong>on</strong> about what will happen in the future,<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>s of a course of acti<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the intensity of rhetoric [158]. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Sentiment</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

analysis whose goal is to classify text for intensity of rhetoric, for example, can be<br />

used to identify flames (postings that c<strong>on</strong>tain antag<strong>on</strong>istic language) <strong>on</strong> a message<br />

board for moderator attenti<strong>on</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!