05.07.2014 Views

Kingfisher Local Area Plan - Regional District of North Okanagan

Kingfisher Local Area Plan - Regional District of North Okanagan

Kingfisher Local Area Plan - Regional District of North Okanagan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Kingfisher</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> | Site360 / MMM Group Limited | November, 2010 | 302-0450<br />

6.4.4 <strong>Plan</strong> for Water System<br />

Upgrades<br />

6.4.5 Initiate Water Demand<br />

Management<br />

6.4.6 Prepare Road Standards<br />

<strong>Plan</strong><br />

6.4.7 Prepare Long-Term Road<br />

Improvements <strong>Plan</strong><br />

6.4.8 Construct Emergency<br />

Access Link<br />

6.5 Emergency <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />

6.5.1 Improve Public<br />

Awareness<strong>of</strong> Emergency<br />

Response <strong>Plan</strong><br />

6.5.2 Promote FireSmart<br />

Education and Awareness<br />

Jurisdiction<br />

Time Frame:<br />

Current (now-5 years),<br />

Medium (5-10 years),<br />

Long (beyond 10 years)<br />

Is this a key<br />

recommendation for<br />

improving carrying<br />

capacity?<br />

Implications if not<br />

acted on<br />

RDNO, MoE, IHA C – planing, feasibility Yes Water system will<br />

continue to function<br />

above capacity at peak<br />

periods, no opportunity<br />

to expand service area<br />

RDNO, Community C Yes Missed opportunity to<br />

extend functional<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

water sytem<br />

RDNO, MoTI<br />

C – planning and<br />

Yes See 6.3.3<br />

feasibilty<br />

RDNO, MoTI C – planning No – but is a perception <strong>of</strong><br />

safety issue<br />

Leaves all road issues<br />

to the sole discretion<br />

<strong>of</strong> MoTI<br />

MoTI, RDNO C – planning, design Yes No alternate<br />

emergency access<br />

routes (loops) to<br />

Enderby-Mabel lake<br />

Road<br />

RDNO C No Lack <strong>of</strong> community<br />

awarenes <strong>of</strong><br />

Emergency <strong>Plan</strong>ning<br />

RDNO, MFR, Community C No Missed opportunity for<br />

community<br />

involvement in wildfire<br />

hazardmitigation<br />

RDNO, MFR C - feasibilty No No improvement to<br />

broad based<br />

community wildfire<br />

hazaed mitigation<br />

6.5.3 Explore Potential for<br />

Open Fuel Breaks<br />

ingfisher/Mabel Lake<br />

64<br />

<strong>Kingfisher</strong>/Mabel Lake<br />

6.5.4 Explore Fire Protection<br />

Service Options<br />

6.5.5 Seek Provincial<br />

Commitment to Maintain<br />

Emergency Egress<br />

Jurisdiction<br />

RDNO, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Safety and Solicitor<br />

General<br />

Time Frame:<br />

Current (now-5 years),<br />

Medium (5-10 years),<br />

Long (beyond 10 years)<br />

Is this a key<br />

recommendation for<br />

improving carrying<br />

capacity?<br />

Implications if not<br />

acted on<br />

C – feasibility Yes No reduction in fire<br />

risks, missed<br />

opportunity for<br />

communtiy based<br />

volunteer organisation<br />

RDNO, MFR C Yes – but only in Medium and<br />

Long term<br />

Potential loss <strong>of</strong><br />

alternate route out <strong>of</strong><br />

the east end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

communtiy<br />

6.6 Future Land Use<br />

6.6.1 Preserve Current Official<br />

Community <strong>Plan</strong><br />

6.6.2 Consider<br />

Commercial/Industrial<br />

Land for Marine Facility<br />

6.6.3 Prepare Guidelines for<br />

Infill Construction and Re-<br />

Construction<br />

RDNO C Yes Does not require<br />

action<br />

RDNO C Yes Missed alternative to<br />

marine based facilities<br />

to increase boating<br />

capacity and efficiency<br />

<strong>of</strong> exiting boating<br />

facilities<br />

RDNO, MoE, DFO C Yes No clear direction on<br />

future development<br />

standards, particularly<br />

on waterfront lots<br />

6.6.4 Acknowledge Growth RDNO, Community C Yes Ad hoc planning<br />

6.7 Rural/Agricultural Policies<br />

6.7.1 Review Zoning Bylaw No.<br />

1888, 2003 Section 301<br />

6.7.2 Support Recreational<br />

Opportunities on ALR and<br />

Rural Lands<br />

RDNO C No Missed opportunites<br />

for rural land holdings<br />

RDNO, ALC C Yes Missed opportunity to<br />

diversify recreation<br />

industry, promote ecotourism<br />

65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!