Kingfisher Local Area Plan - Regional District of North Okanagan
Kingfisher Local Area Plan - Regional District of North Okanagan
Kingfisher Local Area Plan - Regional District of North Okanagan
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4<br />
2.2 Census Data<br />
The 2001 Canada Statistics Census (as reported through BC Stats) indicated that<br />
there were 195 residents within the <strong>Kingfisher</strong> census area who indicated it was<br />
there principal residence. This was a drop from 1996 when there was a reported<br />
population <strong>of</strong> 226. The 2001 reporting population was pretty evenly split with<br />
51% male and 49% female. Some other summary data from the 2006 census:<br />
• 170 <strong>of</strong> the 195 were over the age <strong>of</strong> 15years old, 30 were over 65 years old.<br />
• 100% <strong>of</strong> the respondents owned their own dwelling which had an average<br />
value <strong>of</strong> $167,252.<br />
• Of the reported population, there were none listed as aboriginal, none<br />
listed as visible minorities, 27% listed as immigrants and <strong>of</strong> those<br />
immigrants, almost 65% <strong>of</strong> those were born in Germany.<br />
• The top two occupations by population were Educational Services; and,<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional, Scientific and Technical Services. These two categories<br />
covered all <strong>of</strong> the full time work force. There were 60 people listed within<br />
the labour force with 100% <strong>of</strong> them listed as employed.<br />
Unfortunately, BC Stats has not published detailed updates <strong>of</strong> the 2006 Census<br />
but the population count rose to 238.<br />
<strong>Kingfisher</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Area</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> | Site360 / MMM Group Limited | November, 2010 | 302-0450<br />
ingfisher/Mabel Lake<br />
The <strong>Kingfisher</strong>/Mabel Lake<br />
area is located 37 kilometres<br />
east <strong>of</strong> Enderby in Electoral<br />
<strong>Area</strong> “F” <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Regional</strong><br />
<strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>North</strong> <strong>Okanagan</strong>.<br />
<strong>Kingfisher</strong>/Mabel Lake<br />
3.0 Current Official Community<br />
<strong>Plan</strong> for Electoral <strong>Area</strong> “F”<br />
The current OCP for Electoral <strong>Area</strong> “F” was prepared in 2004 and adopted in 2005.<br />
As with many Official Community <strong>Plan</strong>s, there is a lot <strong>of</strong> background discussion on<br />
the overall theme <strong>of</strong> the OCP and then specific policies within each section. The<br />
specific policies are the only portions which have any legal force and effect as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the OCP bylaw, but the background and discussion materials provide general<br />
purpose and intent for the policies.<br />
The OCP for Electoral <strong>Area</strong> “F” provides a general theme <strong>of</strong> urban containment and<br />
rural preservation. The majority <strong>of</strong> new permanent residential growth is directed<br />
to the City <strong>of</strong> Enderby where infrastructure and community services are provided.<br />
Limited opportunities are identified within the plan area for seasonal residential<br />
and comprehensive resort development. Development in rural areas is generally<br />
discouraged and preservation <strong>of</strong> agriculturally viable lands is encouraged. There<br />
are few direct references to the <strong>Kingfisher</strong> area within the OCP but there are many<br />
general policies that apply for the purpose <strong>of</strong> future growth and preservation. The<br />
following sections summarize the general intent <strong>of</strong> the OCP with regard to specific<br />
land use categories.<br />
3.1 Rural/Agricultural<br />
The policies listed within Division IV <strong>of</strong> the OCP generally follow the policies and<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the Agricultural Land Commission Act. In summary, non-agricultural<br />
development <strong>of</strong> viable agricultural lands is strongly discouraged. Further policies<br />
seek to limit or control non-agricultural development on non-ALR lands in order<br />
to minimise impacts to ALR lands. These policies are typical <strong>of</strong> any OCP where<br />
there are ALR lands involved. The ALC has statutory review obligations for an OCP<br />
Bylaw and will make sure that these kinds <strong>of</strong> provision are included before they<br />
will “sign <strong>of</strong>f” on the OCP Bylaw.<br />
However, the OCP acknowledges that there are conflicting policies with respect to<br />
the protection <strong>of</strong> the environment and the preservation <strong>of</strong> agricultural activities.<br />
When the Riparian <strong>Area</strong> Regulations were enacted provincially, they imposed<br />
province wide standards for environmental protection for all riparian areas<br />
adjacent to water bodies. These regulations were also intended to streamline<br />
with federal Department <strong>of</strong> Fisheries and Oceans regulations that protect fish and<br />
potential fish habitat.<br />
5