11.07.2014 Views

Weekend/Weekday Ozone Observations in the South Coast Air Basin

Weekend/Weekday Ozone Observations in the South Coast Air Basin

Weekend/Weekday Ozone Observations in the South Coast Air Basin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dioxide (NO 2 ) 4 , and carbon monoxide (CO), which serves as an estimate of nonmethane<br />

hydrocarbons (NMHC). Non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) were estimated from CO us<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

empirical relationship between NMHC and CO from canister samples collected by Desert<br />

Research Institute at three sites <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SoCAB dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> summers of 1995 and 1996 (Ziel<strong>in</strong>ska<br />

et al. 1999) 5 . The retrospective analysis of ambient data focused on day-of-<strong>the</strong>-week differences<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> overnight carryover of ozone precursors, <strong>the</strong> extent of <strong>in</strong>hibition of ozone formation dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> morn<strong>in</strong>g due to titration with NO, and <strong>the</strong> rate of ozone accumulation from <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>hibition period to time of peak ozone. For <strong>the</strong> purposes of this analysis, <strong>the</strong> time at which [NO]<br />

= [O 3 ] was used to mark <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> ozone <strong>in</strong>hibition period. Changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rate of ozone<br />

accumulation were correlated to historic trends <strong>in</strong> CO/NOx ratios, which served as partial<br />

surrogates for trends <strong>in</strong> VOC/NOx ratios.<br />

Current observations of <strong>the</strong> weekend effect were characterized by exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> summer<br />

1999 and 2000 ambient data from <strong>the</strong> <strong>South</strong> <strong>Coast</strong> <strong>Air</strong> Quality Management District (SCAQMD)<br />

Photochemical Assessment Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Stations (PAMS) <strong>in</strong> Azusa, Pico Rivera, and Upland and<br />

from <strong>the</strong> California <strong>Air</strong> Resources Board ozone precursor trends site <strong>in</strong> downtown Los Angeles<br />

(North Ma<strong>in</strong>). The analyses focused on relat<strong>in</strong>g weekday differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> diurnal variations of<br />

CO, NMHC, NO, and NO 2 , and NOx with variations <strong>in</strong> ozone, VOC/NOx ratios, and <strong>the</strong> ratios<br />

of O 3 to potential ozone (i.e., O 3 plus NOx). <strong>Weekday</strong> variations of ozone were also related to<br />

VOC reactivity, photochemical ag<strong>in</strong>g, and estimated photolysis rate parameter for NO 2 . Current<br />

weekday and weekend observations of <strong>the</strong> VOC and NOx mix<strong>in</strong>g ratios are superimposed on an<br />

ozone isopleth plot along with similar observations from 1987.<br />

The experimental phase of this study focused on time-resolved measurements of VOC,<br />

NOx, CO, and particulate black carbon to exam<strong>in</strong>e relationships between emissions sources and<br />

<strong>the</strong> diurnal and day-of-<strong>the</strong>-week variations of ozone precursors and VOC/NOx ratios. The field<br />

study was conducted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Los Angeles area over a period of 9 days from September 30, 2000 to<br />

October 8, 2000. The field measurements <strong>in</strong>volved two approaches: supplemental measurements<br />

at exist<strong>in</strong>g SCAQMD monitor<strong>in</strong>g sites and mobile sampl<strong>in</strong>g along freeway and surface street<br />

loops and at regional/background sites. Supplemental measurements made by DRI at <strong>the</strong><br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g stations <strong>in</strong>cluded hourly C 2 to C 11 volatile organic compounds by automated gas<br />

chromatography with mass spectrometry (Varian 3800 GC <strong>in</strong>terfaced to an Entech model 7100<br />

automated preconcentrator and a Varian Saturn 2000 ion trap mass spectrometer) at Azusa,<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uous black carbon by light absorption with an Anderson RTAA-1000 aethalometer<br />

(approximately 5-m<strong>in</strong>ute averages) at Azusa and Pico Rivera, and 3-hour composite Tenax<br />

samples for C 8 to C 18 hydrocarbons beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g at 2, 6, and 9 a.m. PDT on September 30, October<br />

4 NO 2 is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> difference of NOx and NO measured by chemilum<strong>in</strong>escence analyzers. In addition to<br />

NO 2 , analyzers that are commonly used at air quality monitor<strong>in</strong>g stations also convert o<strong>the</strong>r reactive nitrogen oxide<br />

species such as PAN to NO, <strong>the</strong>reby caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terference. NO 2 reported by <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>struments must be considered<br />

upper limits. The magnitude of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terference is relatively small <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> urban center where NO sources are large,<br />

but can be substantial <strong>in</strong> downw<strong>in</strong>d and rural areas.<br />

5 Because data were not available prior to <strong>the</strong> early 1990s, NMHC is estimated from CO us<strong>in</strong>g an empirical<br />

relationship between NMHC and CO for data collected <strong>in</strong> 1995 and 1996. While <strong>the</strong>se estimates are reasonably<br />

valid for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g day-of-<strong>the</strong>-week variations <strong>in</strong> NMHC concentrations and NMHC/NOx ratios for any year<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 18-year period of <strong>in</strong>terest, <strong>the</strong>y are less reliable for estimat<strong>in</strong>g long-term trends <strong>in</strong> NMHC and<br />

NMHC/NOx ratios because <strong>the</strong> slope of <strong>the</strong> regression between CO and NMHC may have changed over time with<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g emission control technology.<br />

1-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!