14.07.2014 Views

CHNN 22, Spring 2008 - School of Social Sciences

CHNN 22, Spring 2008 - School of Social Sciences

CHNN 22, Spring 2008 - School of Social Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Concluding Remarks<br />

Without further investigation, it is impossible to draw conclusions from these figures. But it is<br />

tempting to speculate. One speculation is this; that the decline in membership figures after the<br />

mid-1970s may have been largely generational. The fall does not seem to have related directly to<br />

political events (like 1968 – or even, in the long term, 1956); but it could be credibly explained by<br />

mortality. If many members had joined in the 1930s and early 1940s (aged, perhaps, in their early<br />

twenties), 4 and if that group represented the core <strong>of</strong> the loyal membership <strong>of</strong> the party, the sad<br />

truth is, that by 1975, it is actuarially probable that they would have started to die, in increasing<br />

numbers. Given mortality rates for manual workers, who made up much <strong>of</strong> the party’s core<br />

membership, especially in the large industrial districts, a sharp decline in membership in those<br />

areas could have been accounted for by mortality alone, especially for men aged 65 and over. (If, by<br />

contrast, many <strong>of</strong> the doughty Cornish and Devonian members were drawn from middle-class<br />

groups such as teachers, with higher life expectancies, the relative out-performance <strong>of</strong> the West<br />

Country in terms <strong>of</strong> membership retention, might also be partly explained.) Similar patterns –<br />

though this is not an analogy that would have appealed to the party – can be seen in the 1970s’<br />

sales figures for soap-powders, where old brands (adopted by consumers early in their married<br />

lives) were, by 1976, dying along with their loyal users. 5<br />

Harold Carter, St John’s College, Oxford<br />

haroldcarter@mac.com<br />

Gabriel Silkstone-Carter, Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge<br />

Harold Carter is working on the changing political economy British cities between 1945 and the present day;<br />

he is especially interested in the political and social impact <strong>of</strong> fifty years <strong>of</strong> social-democratic intervention in<br />

housing and planning, in the context <strong>of</strong> de-industrialisation. As part <strong>of</strong> this project he has written detailed<br />

histories <strong>of</strong> Southwark and <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, and he is currently working on the rise <strong>of</strong> the left in Sheffield before<br />

1984. Gabriel Silkstone-Carter is writing on the role <strong>of</strong> the Communist Party in the 1972 Miners' Strike in<br />

Kent. They would be very interested to hear from anyone with information (especially personal<br />

reminiscences) relating to these topics.<br />

Notes<br />

1 All our sources are loose documents in the box CP/CENT/ORG/19 (folders /01 to /04), in the Communist<br />

Party Archive in the People’s History Museum Manchester. There is an un-sourced part typed and part<br />

handwritten document, in folder 19/04 <strong>of</strong> that box, which gives annual membership totals for the party but<br />

no regional breakdown; these totals cross-check with the figures we report. The maximum divergence<br />

between the two totals is 5% <strong>of</strong> the total membership (in 1957), and the figures for other years agree closely.<br />

On 10 occasions the divergence is 2% or less, and on two others it is 3%.<br />

2 We have also reported numerically, though not graphically, three bench-mark years (1945, 1955, and 1957)<br />

because rather comprehensive data are available for those years (and we would like to draw attention to<br />

them), and because 1945 in particular represented a strong year for party membership (presumably, partly<br />

reflecting the popularity <strong>of</strong> the USSR as a wartime ally, and partly reflecting the continuing political activity<br />

<strong>of</strong> the CPGB at a time when Labour Party activism was muted by the exigencies <strong>of</strong> war).<br />

3 In the graphs, 1987 has been inserted as an average <strong>of</strong> 1985 and 1989, since no data were available in the<br />

file for 1986, 1987, or 1988. The graphs are available in coloured-in form (which is easier to read) in the<br />

online version <strong>of</strong> the Newsletter.<br />

4 Party membership peaked, at 56,000, in 1942, according to the unsourced document in file<br />

CP/CENT/ORG/19/04, which we have no reason to believe to be inaccurate.<br />

5 Author’s notes; presentation by Proctor and Gamble Ltd, Newcastle, 1975.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!