15.07.2014 Views

Research Based FYP Guideline

Research Based FYP Guideline

Research Based FYP Guideline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>FYP</strong> Committee


Content<br />

Background<br />

<strong>Research</strong> based <strong>FYP</strong> <strong>Guideline</strong>s<br />

<strong>FYP</strong> Report


Background<br />

Requirements from Engineering Accreditation Council<br />

(EAC) Malaysia:<br />

An investigative research oriented approach to engineering<br />

studies.<br />

A requirement of the programme to include a significant<br />

project in its later stages.<br />

Individual analysis and judgement, capable of being assessed<br />

independently.<br />

Develop techniques in literature review and information<br />

processing, as necessary with all research approaches.<br />

Provide opportunities to utilise appropriate modern<br />

technology in some aspects of the work, emphasising the<br />

need for engineers to make use of computers and multimedia<br />

technology in everyday practice.


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Based</strong> <strong>FYP</strong> <strong>Guideline</strong>s<br />

1. To conduct a focused literature review<br />

To understand the problem.<br />

To study previous related work<br />

Recent literature (


<strong>Research</strong> <strong>Based</strong> <strong>FYP</strong> <strong>Guideline</strong>s<br />

3. To implement the solution or carry out the<br />

investigation<br />

4. To evaluate the implementation or analyse the<br />

collected data with detail analysis and discussions<br />

To compare with previous or known results<br />

5. To conclude the investigation<br />

6. To recommend future work


<strong>FYP</strong> Report General Requirements<br />

The standard <strong>FYP</strong> report format is strictly followed (refer to the detail<br />

<strong>FYP</strong> Report <strong>Guideline</strong>s).<br />

The <strong>FYP</strong> report has been verified against plagiarism via Turnitin, that<br />

the report is original with proper citations.<br />

The <strong>FYP</strong> report is easy to read with a sound logical structure. All<br />

aspects of the project are properly documented in the report.<br />

Writing is technically sound. Technical terms are properly used and not<br />

excessive.<br />

From the abstract, readers are able to tell what are investigated and the<br />

findings.<br />

From the conclusion, readers are able to tell what are the major<br />

achievements of the project.<br />

All figures are crystal clear.<br />

No of pages: typically about 50 pages


<strong>FYP</strong> Report Outline<br />

Introduction<br />

Theoretical Background or Review of Literature<br />

Method of Investigation or Details of Design<br />

Presentation of Data and Discussions on Findings<br />

Conclusions and Recommendations<br />

References


Introduction<br />

Motivation (Why do this <strong>FYP</strong>?)<br />

Project scope and objectives (Problem statement)<br />

Report outline


Theoretical Background or Review of Literature<br />

Details of previous research work and findings<br />

Knowledge gaps<br />

Use citations, e.g. [4].<br />

Must follow the standard citation format described in<br />

Must follow the standard citation format described in<br />

the detail <strong>FYP</strong> report guidelines.


Method of Investigation or Details of Design<br />

Empirical research<br />

The measurement setup, calibration and measurement<br />

procedures, etc.<br />

Constructive research<br />

The construct, e.g. theory, algorithm, model,<br />

hardware/software, etc.<br />

The experimental setup and procedures to evaluate the<br />

construct performance.


Presentation of Data and Discussions on Findings<br />

Compare data with previous or known results if available.<br />

Present and compare data using graphs, charts, tables, etc.<br />

Explain ALL presented data and comparisons.<br />

Draw and explain the implications of the data and<br />

comparisons.<br />

For example, if there are discrepancies between the<br />

theoretical and experimental results, an analysis or discussion<br />

should follow to explain the possible cause or source of error.


Conclusions and Recommendations<br />

Summarize the work done.<br />

Highlight the main contributions of the work and its<br />

significance and constraints.<br />

Do not add new information (e.g. results that were not<br />

reported earlier).<br />

Discuss the implications or potential applications of<br />

the results.<br />

Recommend possible future work.


References<br />

Follow the format

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!