15.07.2014 Views

Weird and Wonderful Pump Failures - Calgary Pump Symposium

Weird and Wonderful Pump Failures - Calgary Pump Symposium

Weird and Wonderful Pump Failures - Calgary Pump Symposium

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Weird</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wonderful</strong> <strong>Pump</strong><br />

<strong>Failures</strong><br />

Or:<br />

It was not so wonderful at the time but I did<br />

learn something.


Topics<br />

1. Reactor Feed <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

2. Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

3. Amine <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

4. Fertilizer Plant pump<br />

5. Sulphur Transfer <strong>Pump</strong><br />

6. Stripper Sour Water <strong>Pump</strong><br />

7. Low Flow Recirculation<br />

8. Foreign Objects


1: Reactor Feed <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Three 100% pumps, two are steam drive, one is electric drive.<br />

Typically the steam drives are running (1 per train) with<br />

electric drive on st<strong>and</strong>-by.<br />

<strong>Pump</strong>s are 8 stage 3” IJ’s, BB5 design<br />

Single bellows style seal with SC rotating face, TC stationary<br />

face,<br />

Plan 32 seal flush (66 °C gas oil) <strong>and</strong> Plan 62 steam quench<br />

Tilt pad axial <strong>and</strong> radial bearings, full vibration probe suite


14.6 ft


Reactor Feed <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o 1304 KW at 5600 rpm<br />

o Rated Flow: 140 m3/hr (616 gpm)<br />

o Rated Head: 2201 m (7221 ft)<br />

o Discharge Pressure: 20,021 kPag (2903 psig)<br />

o Normal temperature: 232 C (450 F)<br />

o Max. Temperature: 288 C (550 F)<br />

o NPSHa: 13 m (42 ft)<br />

o NPSHr: 11 m (36 ft)<br />

o Material class is API A-8 (316 AUS) but case is carbon steel<br />

with 316L cladding


Reactor Feed <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

3000<br />

NOTE FLAT SLOPE<br />

HEAD <strong>and</strong> PWR<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

Min. Flow<br />

Rated Point<br />

500<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200<br />

FLow (m3/hr)<br />

HEAD (m)<br />

PWR (kW)


Start-up <strong>and</strong> Operation issues:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

When units are started for the first time (at minimum flow)<br />

the vibration levels <strong>and</strong> performance are acceptable.<br />

But after being in service for a couple of weeks one of the<br />

units goes down on high vibration.<br />

Teardown shows rubbing damage to wear-rings <strong>and</strong> balance<br />

bushing, some loose case wear rings, <strong>and</strong><br />

movement of the 7’th stage impeller away from suction then<br />

back towards suction into the diffuser ring.


Back of 7’th stage impeller <strong>and</strong> 7’th stage<br />

diffuser


Start-up <strong>and</strong> Operation issues:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Initial failure is thought to be due to breakdown of the wearring<br />

material <strong>and</strong> internal rubs caused by poor warm-up<br />

procedures, hot misalignment, <strong>and</strong> cavitation.<br />

This leads to a great deal of work doing hot alignment <strong>and</strong><br />

base deflection measurements with lasers, baseplate grouting<br />

repairs, warm-up piping <strong>and</strong> procedures mod’s etc.<br />

The initial failed unit is re-built with the wear ring coatings<br />

applied using a different process <strong>and</strong> the Operations staff are<br />

told to monitor/control the warm-up process better.


Start-up <strong>and</strong> Operation issues:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

There are more failures of a similar nature…..even on the first<br />

unit with the repaired base-pad, the tighter warm-up controls<br />

<strong>and</strong> more accurate hot alignment.<br />

Other issues with the units are discovered<br />

• Seal failures due to poor balancing of seal flush rates to<br />

each end of the machine…the piping gets changed.<br />

• More insulation is added to the casing, balance line loop<br />

<strong>and</strong> warm-up piping to prevent blockage.<br />

• Modifications to warm-up piping are proposed to improve<br />

flow control when units are cold but never implemented.


Start-up <strong>and</strong> Operation issues:<br />

o<br />

• Seal face damage due to wet quench steam flashing inside<br />

the seal. Additional steam traps are added.<br />

• The anti-rotation keys at each case ring are increased in<br />

length to positively clamp the rings in place axially.<br />

• Lube oil water contamination caused by steam leaking<br />

from the turbine gl<strong>and</strong>s (2-3 gallons/day) fixed by<br />

installing In-Pro seals on the bearing housings.<br />

After a few more failures, sometimes 7’th stage, sometimes<br />

8’th stage we finally started to zero-in on the main failure<br />

cause…..


Start-up <strong>and</strong> Operation issues:<br />

o<br />

The minimum flow control system<br />

• During normal operation the closed minimum flow valve<br />

would cool off <strong>and</strong> not open properly when forward flow<br />

to the process was cut back at the fired heater.<br />

• The small filters in the pump discharge flow meter purge<br />

oil system would continually plug up taking the flow<br />

meter off-line or make the measurement in-accurate. The<br />

operators had to manually control the min-flow valve with<br />

absolutely no information as to the actual pump flow rate.<br />

• The pump discharge pressure at less than min-flow was<br />

enough to force the min-flow valve closed. The actuator<br />

was not sized big enough to keep the valve open!


Summary<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

We got caught up believing the drop in flow was caused by<br />

damage in the pump when it was actually the other way<br />

round….the drop in flow (dead-heading) was causing the<br />

pump damage.<br />

When the min-flow control system was fixed the pump<br />

reliability went way up.<br />

Keep going back to the physical evidence….the backward<br />

moving impellers should have focused us to a hydraulic<br />

cause.


2: Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Three 100% pumps, One for each train, one spare.<br />

Electric drive with gearbox reduction to 203 rpm<br />

<strong>Pump</strong>s are 3 3/8 X 6 VTEM vertical triplex recips<br />

Class S-1 design, sour specification for fluid end<br />

Sleeve bearings, forged crank, aux lube oil system<br />

Two amine pumps are similar design but different operating<br />

speed.


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o 300 hp at 203 rpm<br />

o Rated Flow: 30.5 m3/hr (616 gpm)<br />

o Suction Pressure: 340 kPag (49 psi)<br />

o Discharge Pressure: 18,453 kPag (2676 psig)<br />

o Normal temperature: 95 C (203 F)<br />

o Max. Temperature: 98 C (208 F)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

NPSHa: 27 m (88 ft)<br />

NPSHr: 15 m (49 ft)


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o Numerous issues from day 1<br />

• Packing leaks due to poor<br />

plunger <strong>and</strong> push rod<br />

alignment<br />

• Poor valve life<br />

• Broken crankshafts due to<br />

fatigue initiating at hotshort<br />

tears in forging<br />

• Cracked fluid head<br />

allowing water into<br />

crankcase


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

Failure of forged pressure head


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o Failure of forged pressure head


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Major review conducted of operating history <strong>and</strong><br />

head design including FEA by OEM<br />

Fortunately we had lots of pressure data due to valve<br />

performance <strong>and</strong> cavitation studies.


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Results of studies show that pump should be<br />

safe from fatigue failures even at off-spec<br />

operating conditions.<br />

So why did the block fail?<br />

HINT---The FEA analysis was based on the<br />

OEM’s drawings for the head.


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

Dimensional checks of the failed head showed that the radius<br />

at the bottom of the suction valve pocket was smaller than<br />

design by 1/8 inch!


Wash Water <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Using the actual radius in the FEA model indicated<br />

that fatigue was possible.<br />

Suspect that the machinist used the wrong size tool<br />

when the suction valve pockets were being machined<br />

All similar heads on site checked… one other head<br />

had to be replaced.<br />

Considered shot-peening the radius area to improve<br />

fatigue resistance but no further failures occurred.


3: Amine <strong>Pump</strong>s


Amine <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Lean Amine API Type BB3 pumps protected by three<br />

shutdown systems:<br />

• Low feed drum level<br />

• Low discharge pressure<br />

• High vibration<br />

Nuisance trips cause changes to controls:<br />

• The low discharge pressure SD is removed for start-up but<br />

not reinstated after start-up<br />

• The low level trip on the feed drum is tied to the pump<br />

shutdown.<br />

• High vibration SD’s changed to 2 out of 2 voting<br />

• Vibration SD set points raised<br />

No one caught that the vibration levels were set too high.


Amine <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Residence time in the feed drum is very short<br />

Low level trip was lowered to 2% from 15% to prevent<br />

nuisance pump shutdowns<br />

Level transmitter sensing legs were equalized with glycol<br />

The glycol in the sensing legs became unbalanced, <strong>and</strong><br />

indicated a higher feed drum level than what there actually<br />

was <strong>and</strong> the pump ran dry<br />

Another incident elsewhere in the plant took the operators<br />

attention away from operating the plant to shutting the plant<br />

down


Amine <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Outside operator attempted to shut down the operating pump<br />

because it was “making noise”<br />

The control system auto-starts the second pump <strong>and</strong> shortly<br />

thereafter it starts making a loud noise too.<br />

Vibration instruments did not shut the pumps down.<br />

“Pinning out” the local start button successfully stopped these<br />

pumps.<br />

Remarkably, both pumps were still capable of moving liquid<br />

when drum level was restored.


First rotor, 1’st stage impeller warped <strong>and</strong><br />

cracked


First rotor, 2’nd stage impeller thrust<br />

damage


First rotor, general condition of the<br />

case


Second rotor, 2’nd stage impeller thrust<br />

damage, broken wear rings


Second case, bottom half wear ring l<strong>and</strong><br />

damage


Second rotor, impeller keyway damage


Amine <strong>Pump</strong>s<br />

Removal <strong>and</strong> repairs began within 2 days.<br />

<strong>Pump</strong>s were repaired in t<strong>and</strong>em utilizing two repair shops,<br />

both shops working 24 hours per day.<br />

Extensive weld repairs needed for cases <strong>and</strong> impellers<br />

New shafts, wear rings, <strong>and</strong> bearings installed<br />

A temporary 14 stage rental pump was installed in case there<br />

was an issue with any of the repaired pumps. Skid pump was<br />

never operated.<br />

<strong>Pump</strong> repair was 16 days stream to stream<br />

Rental pump installation was completed in 14 days.<br />

AN AMAZING AMOUNT OF WORK IN A SHORT TIME<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o


Rental pump installation


Rental pump installation is ready for<br />

service


4: Fertilizer Plant<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

1,500 hp double suction pump running at<br />

3,600 rpm. Double volute<br />

<strong>Pump</strong> design used extensively in Europe with<br />

very good reliability in similar service<br />

Original impeller is 6 vane design<br />

o Impeller <strong>and</strong>/or shaft failure approx every 6<br />

months


Impeller Damage


Fertilizer Plant<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Change to 6 staggered vanes <strong>and</strong> very large radius on keyway<br />

under impeller ….increased life to approx 4 years<br />

Further change to 7 vane staggered <strong>and</strong> profiled case<br />

cutwaters …. problem has basically gone away.<br />

Thoughts on the service/pump:<br />

• very high energy pump<br />

• 6 vanes <strong>and</strong> double cutwater, a common European design,<br />

often leads to very large pressure pulsations<br />

• pump initially designed <strong>and</strong> checked for 50 Hz power<br />

(3000 rpm) but not for 60 Hz (3600 rpm)


5: Sulphur Transfer <strong>Pump</strong><br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Two vertical centrifugal VS4 style pumps installed in vessel.<br />

“A” pump top bearing deterioration detected by periodic<br />

vibration monitoring<br />

Switched to st<strong>and</strong>-by “B” pump but very little flow<br />

developed. “B” unit had not been operated for 12 months


Sulphur Transfer <strong>Pump</strong><br />

o<br />

o<br />

Pulled “B” pump <strong>and</strong> found extensive blockage due to chunks<br />

of 3/8 to 3/4 inch sulphurcrete in the impeller <strong>and</strong> suction.<br />

The original strainer was designed with maximum perforation<br />

of 1”.


Sulphur Transfer <strong>Pump</strong><br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Raise the pump suction 3 feet by<br />

shortening the column<br />

increase the normal liquid level in<br />

vessel to 20% to maintain NPSHa<br />

at required value.<br />

pump strainer re-designed to block<br />

particles larger than 3/8”<br />

Operating procedure put in place to<br />

switch pumps on a fixed schedule


6: Stripper Sour Water <strong>Pump</strong><br />

o<br />

Corrosion found on 4140 shaft near stuffing box <strong>and</strong><br />

on case wear ring seats of the A216 casing halves


Stripper Sour Water <strong>Pump</strong><br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Corrosion mechanism is probably related to<br />

selenium concentration…not normally expected in<br />

this process.<br />

Suspect that upstream oil s<strong>and</strong> feed is responsible<br />

Upgraded the shaft components as follows:<br />

• – Base material to 12Cr.<br />

• – HVOF coated


7: Low Flow Re-circulation<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Ansi 1 X 2 -10 condensate pump<br />

2 years of operation at high head – low flow<br />

2 thrust bearing failures in 2 years<br />

Pulled impeller <strong>and</strong> found ¼ inch metal loss<br />

due to improper adjustment<br />

Strong evidence of discharge recirculation


Low Flow Recirculation


Low Flow Recirculation


8: Foreign objects


Foreign objects


Comment<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Some say failure analysis is easier now because of the sophisticated data<br />

collection <strong>and</strong> trending tools we have.<br />

To this I say ……


Comment<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Some say it is failure analysis is easier now because of the sophisticated data<br />

collection <strong>and</strong> trending tools we have.<br />

To this I say ……


My thanks to:<br />

o<br />

Chris Gilmour<br />

o<br />

Jim Dziadyk<br />

o<br />

C. Dale Alleyne<br />

o<br />

Frank DiRocco<br />

o<br />

Brad Hatton<br />

o<br />

John Hogan<br />

o<br />

Scott Masterson<br />

o<br />

Gordon Lawrence<br />

o<br />

Matt Pickard<br />

o<br />

David Goddard<br />

o<br />

Hector J. Amaya<br />

for providing pictures<br />

<strong>and</strong> information for<br />

this presentation!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!