15.07.2014 Views

RECOGNITION OF NON-FORMAL AND INFORMAL ... - Solidar

RECOGNITION OF NON-FORMAL AND INFORMAL ... - Solidar

RECOGNITION OF NON-FORMAL AND INFORMAL ... - Solidar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>RECOGNITION</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>NON</strong>-<strong>FORMAL</strong> <strong>AND</strong> IN<strong>FORMAL</strong><br />

COMPETENCES <strong>OF</strong> WORKERS’ REPRESENTATIVES<br />

<strong>NON</strong>-<strong>FORMAL</strong>LY <strong>AND</strong> IN<strong>FORMAL</strong>LY ACQUIRED<br />

COMPETENCES IN THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT<br />

PART III<br />

3 /<br />

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

¬ The project, ‘Promoting the Agenda for New Skills and Jobs:<br />

Strengthening Individual Learning Pathways by Developing<br />

Skills Assessment Tools for Workers’, was aimed at identifying<br />

and safeguarding the competences acquired informally, either<br />

through work or in the private domain. To this end, the experiences<br />

of the international project partners were utilised in<br />

order to follow a viable path which was not dictated by timeconsuming<br />

assessment centres, but which would lead to tangible<br />

outcomes for workers, notwithstanding the limited time<br />

available to the workers involved.<br />

In numerous meetings, the international composition of the project<br />

proved that this topic is still lacking clear defi nitions. Some<br />

of the catchphrases included informal and non-formal competence,<br />

informal learning, practical knowledge, prior learning,<br />

soft skills, informal learning outcomes and many others.<br />

Nevertheless, the project partners gained the following experiences<br />

with other target groups which can be regarded as<br />

intermediate results: Informal competences (potentials and<br />

resources) can neither be clearly identifi ed nor measured correctly.<br />

It is not possible to develop a system which can objectively<br />

measure capabilities, skills, qualifi cations, knowledge and<br />

values by mathematical means. Basic competences described<br />

in the literature as personal, technical, methodical, and social<br />

and communicative abilities are, however, manageable. With<br />

this structure it is possible to analyse, document and provide<br />

evidence of these competences more easily in cooperation with<br />

those involved.<br />

formal competences. Competences provide the ability to complete<br />

certain tasks. This is especially true for informally acquired<br />

competences, which is why it is all the more important that the<br />

person is right for the role. What requirements do the tasks that<br />

a person is already carrying out, or wishes to carry out in the<br />

future entail? What requirements does the person already fulfi l?<br />

What are the characteristics that the person needs to have?<br />

Concentrating on only a few job profi les made categorising and<br />

assessing informal competences easier for us. Measurement and<br />

validation proved to be more diffi cult. However, this is also the<br />

case when comparing formal competences. These problems will<br />

arise even more frequently when general recognition and certifi -<br />

cation are the goal. This will be the task of further projects which<br />

are intended to carry out a practical validation of competences<br />

and, most importantly, informal competences. We should not<br />

leave validation to the bodies of the formal systems. We should<br />

try to identify informal competences as practically and as differentiated<br />

as possible and in cooperation with the person concerned.<br />

Moreover, we should regard the enrichment of informal<br />

competences in a specifi c job, at work, in civil and political roles<br />

and in one‘s private and family life as a never-ending process.<br />

Although the European Council and Cedefop are pursuing the<br />

validation and assessment of informal competences within the<br />

formal system, our experiences indicate that an entirely differentiated<br />

course of action is required. We assume that the bodies<br />

which will later issue certifi cations at a national level must<br />

start their work at a level close to that of the workers’ practical<br />

knowledge. Moreover, it will not be possible to base certifi -<br />

cation solely on analysing defi ciencies (“What is lacking that<br />

prevents you from entering this fi eld of work?”). Often, these<br />

(purely) formal competences are less helpful for a job than in-<br />

Photo credits: © Gene Chutka / istockphoto.com<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!