24.07.2014 Views

COMPIT 2003 in Hamburg/ Germany - TUHH

COMPIT 2003 in Hamburg/ Germany - TUHH

COMPIT 2003 in Hamburg/ Germany - TUHH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

products forces the designer to go far beyond the horizon def<strong>in</strong>ed by the empirical design rules.<br />

Marg<strong>in</strong>s become smaller on one hand, and completely new ship types and developments lead<br />

to physical phenomena that are not covered by empirical design rules. Consequently, there is a<br />

strong need for first pr<strong>in</strong>ciple or simulation based applications to support the design process <strong>in</strong><br />

that way the designer needs to take his relevant decisions. On the other hand, most of these first<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ciple based methods are numerical methods and they require a large amount of <strong>in</strong>put data,<br />

which are typically idealized discretizations of the real ship. These models (e.g. f<strong>in</strong>ite-element<br />

method (FEM) model of steel structure) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g data pre- and post-process<strong>in</strong>g required much<br />

manual work, and <strong>in</strong> many cases the cycle times of the calculation did not meet the requirements<br />

by the designers. In this context, the calculations could hardly be used to check a given design<br />

(if the results were available before the first steel was cut), but were far away from be<strong>in</strong>g design<br />

tools.<br />

The goal was (and still is) to develop first pr<strong>in</strong>ciple based tools based on theories fast enough and<br />

accurate enough to deliver answers to the designers questions dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial design phase, to<br />

automate data pre- and post-process<strong>in</strong>g based on <strong>in</strong>formation available from preced<strong>in</strong>g steps of<br />

the design process and to rearrange the design process accord<strong>in</strong>gly.<br />

Time<br />

Ship Design<br />

...<br />

Steel Design ...<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong><br />

Frame<br />

Scantl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Calculation<br />

FEA<br />

Cost<br />

Estimation<br />

FEA Construction<br />

Cost Est.<br />

...<br />

Fig.2: Flowchart of re-eng<strong>in</strong>eered steel structure design process based on first pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />

methods (Courtesy of FSG, Flensburg)<br />

The complete re-eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g of the steel design process with<strong>in</strong> the development of the firstpr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />

based ship design system E4 (here demonstrated by a re-eng<strong>in</strong>eered steel design process,<br />

Fig.2) resulted <strong>in</strong> the reduction of the cycle time for the global FEM calculation from more than<br />

three months to less than two weeks, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pre-approval by the classification society. The<br />

reduced cycle time then offers the opportunity to design and optimize the steel structure for<br />

purpose, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> less weight, lower vibration levels, less production man-hours and reduced<br />

delivery problems.<br />

The concept exploits distributed developments, where research <strong>in</strong>stitutes and universities deliver<br />

basic calculation methods or pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, which are then made fit for practical use <strong>in</strong> close<br />

cooperation with the <strong>in</strong>dustry. Consequently, these f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs result <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g conclusions<br />

for the strategic development of IT based projects:<br />

527

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!