25.07.2014 Views

Delay and Haircuts in Sovereign Debt - University of St Andrews

Delay and Haircuts in Sovereign Debt - University of St Andrews

Delay and Haircuts in Sovereign Debt - University of St Andrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For less extreme beliefs, 0 < q 1 < 1, the creditor’s expected payo¤<br />

from a high o¤er <strong>of</strong> ( s)<br />

2<br />

, which is acceptable to both types <strong>of</strong> debtor,<br />

<br />

2 <br />

is<br />

2 ( s), while the creditor’s expected payo¤ from a low o¤er <strong>of</strong><br />

<br />

2 , which is only acceptable to the Optimistic debtor is q <br />

<br />

1 <br />

2 . If<br />

<br />

<br />

q 1 <br />

2 ><br />

2 <br />

2 ( s), the creditor will do better by mak<strong>in</strong>g a low<br />

<br />

<br />

o¤er but otherwise for q 1 <br />

2 <<br />

2 <br />

2 ( s). When<br />

q1 <br />

2 =<br />

<br />

2 <br />

2 ( s), the two o¤ers give the creditor the same expected payo¤.<br />

This condition implies that the posterior belief <strong>of</strong> the creditor is q 1 = s<br />

.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 0 < s < , it follows that q 1 < 1. We assume that, if the creditor is<br />

<strong>in</strong>di¤erent between a low <strong>and</strong> a high o¤er, he will choose to make a high o¤er.<br />

Table 4 shows the creditor’s o¤ers at t = 3 as a function <strong>of</strong> his posterior<br />

belief.<br />

Creditor’s belief<br />

as to debtor’s type<br />

q 1 > s<br />

<br />

(Probably an Optimist)<br />

q 1 s<br />

<br />

(Probably Cautious)<br />

Expected payo¤<br />

Creditor’s o¤er<br />

for creditor<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

2<br />

q 1 <br />

2<br />

( s)<br />

2<br />

<br />

2 <br />

2 (<br />

Table 4: Creditor’s o¤ers at t = 3 for all values <strong>of</strong> belief<br />

If, however, the debtor is the proposer, the Optimistic debtor’s o¤er is<br />

<br />

( s)<br />

2<br />

, while the Cautious debtor’s o¤er is<br />

2<br />

, which are the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>uation values <strong>of</strong> the creditor as computed <strong>in</strong> Appendix A.<br />

Mov<strong>in</strong>g to the second period, the cont<strong>in</strong>uation values for the debtor <strong>and</strong><br />

the creditor, given the common discount factor, , <strong>and</strong> the fact that each<br />

negotiat<strong>in</strong>g party has an equal probability <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g a proposer, are presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> Table 5. 6<br />

s)<br />

Creditor’s belief<br />

as to debtor’s type<br />

q 1 > s<br />

<br />

(Probably an Optimist)<br />

q 1 s<br />

<br />

(Probably Cautious)<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uation<br />

values for debtor<br />

<br />

2<br />

(+s)<br />

2<br />

<br />

2<br />

Cont<strong>in</strong>uation<br />

values for creditor<br />

<br />

q1<br />

2 <br />

2<br />

( s)<br />

2<br />

<br />

+<br />

<br />

2<br />

6 In Table 5, when q 1 ! 1, the creditor’s cont<strong>in</strong>uation value approaches , which is<br />

2<br />

the same as <strong>in</strong> the case with complete <strong>in</strong>formation about the debtor’s type.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!