Delay and Haircuts in Sovereign Debt - University of St Andrews
Delay and Haircuts in Sovereign Debt - University of St Andrews
Delay and Haircuts in Sovereign Debt - University of St Andrews
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For less extreme beliefs, 0 < q 1 < 1, the creditor’s expected payo¤<br />
from a high o¤er <strong>of</strong> ( s)<br />
2<br />
, which is acceptable to both types <strong>of</strong> debtor,<br />
<br />
2 <br />
is<br />
2 ( s), while the creditor’s expected payo¤ from a low o¤er <strong>of</strong><br />
<br />
2 , which is only acceptable to the Optimistic debtor is q <br />
<br />
1 <br />
2 . If<br />
<br />
<br />
q 1 <br />
2 ><br />
2 <br />
2 ( s), the creditor will do better by mak<strong>in</strong>g a low<br />
<br />
<br />
o¤er but otherwise for q 1 <br />
2 <<br />
2 <br />
2 ( s). When<br />
q1 <br />
2 =<br />
<br />
2 <br />
2 ( s), the two o¤ers give the creditor the same expected payo¤.<br />
This condition implies that the posterior belief <strong>of</strong> the creditor is q 1 = s<br />
.<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce 0 < s < , it follows that q 1 < 1. We assume that, if the creditor is<br />
<strong>in</strong>di¤erent between a low <strong>and</strong> a high o¤er, he will choose to make a high o¤er.<br />
Table 4 shows the creditor’s o¤ers at t = 3 as a function <strong>of</strong> his posterior<br />
belief.<br />
Creditor’s belief<br />
as to debtor’s type<br />
q 1 > s<br />
<br />
(Probably an Optimist)<br />
q 1 s<br />
<br />
(Probably Cautious)<br />
Expected payo¤<br />
Creditor’s o¤er<br />
for creditor<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
2<br />
q 1 <br />
2<br />
( s)<br />
2<br />
<br />
2 <br />
2 (<br />
Table 4: Creditor’s o¤ers at t = 3 for all values <strong>of</strong> belief<br />
If, however, the debtor is the proposer, the Optimistic debtor’s o¤er is<br />
<br />
( s)<br />
2<br />
, while the Cautious debtor’s o¤er is<br />
2<br />
, which are the correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uation values <strong>of</strong> the creditor as computed <strong>in</strong> Appendix A.<br />
Mov<strong>in</strong>g to the second period, the cont<strong>in</strong>uation values for the debtor <strong>and</strong><br />
the creditor, given the common discount factor, , <strong>and</strong> the fact that each<br />
negotiat<strong>in</strong>g party has an equal probability <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g a proposer, are presented<br />
<strong>in</strong> Table 5. 6<br />
s)<br />
Creditor’s belief<br />
as to debtor’s type<br />
q 1 > s<br />
<br />
(Probably an Optimist)<br />
q 1 s<br />
<br />
(Probably Cautious)<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>uation<br />
values for debtor<br />
<br />
2<br />
(+s)<br />
2<br />
<br />
2<br />
Cont<strong>in</strong>uation<br />
values for creditor<br />
<br />
q1<br />
2 <br />
2<br />
( s)<br />
2<br />
<br />
+<br />
<br />
2<br />
6 In Table 5, when q 1 ! 1, the creditor’s cont<strong>in</strong>uation value approaches , which is<br />
2<br />
the same as <strong>in</strong> the case with complete <strong>in</strong>formation about the debtor’s type.<br />
10