07.08.2014 Views

LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott

LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott

LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

THE<br />

OSC’S NEW POWERS:<br />

New offences, tougher sanctions<br />

In addition to the creation of the statutory rights of action described above, the amendments<br />

create additional offences under the Securities Act which may be prosecuted by the OSC and<br />

increase the availability of sanctions for non-compliance with the Securities Act.<br />

3.1 Overview of enforcement alternatives<br />

3.1.1 Penalties and disgorgement<br />

In its mandate to enforce requirements of the Securities Act and to protect the integrity of<br />

the capital markets, the OSC has at least three distinct enforcement routes:<br />

• Section 122: gives the Ontario Court of Justice a quasi-criminal jurisdiction to consider<br />

offences under the Securities Act;<br />

• Section 127: the OSC enforcement staff’s most commonly used enforcement route,<br />

which provides an OSC panel with administrative jurisdiction to conduct hearings and<br />

make determinations regarding non-compliance with the Securities Act as well as a variety<br />

of remedies; and<br />

• Section 128: the least-used enforcement route, which allows OSC enforcement staff to<br />

bring a quasi-civil proceeding before the Ontario Court of Justice seeking a declaration<br />

that there has been a breach of securities law.<br />

In addition to the enforcement remedies contained in the Securities Act, the Criminal Code<br />

contains provisions that are available in serious cases to prosecute wrongdoers for such<br />

crimes as conspiracy, market manipulation and fraud. 1<br />

3.1.2 Violations recognized prior to the amendments<br />

Prior to the amendments, s. 122 proceedings could be commenced for the offences of:<br />

• making a materially misleading or untrue statement to the OSC or to staff of the OSC,<br />

• making materially misleading or untrue statements in documents required to be<br />

furnished or filed under Ontario securities law with the OSC, or<br />

• contravening Ontario securities law (the “basket clause”).<br />

Prior to the amendments, s. 127 allowed the OSC to make orders where a person or<br />

company was found to have either:<br />

• failed to comply with Ontario securities law; or<br />

• acted in a manner inconsistent with the public interest (even though he, she or it had<br />

complied with Ontario securities law).<br />

Prior to the amendments, s. 128 allowed the OSC to apply to the Court for a declaration<br />

that a person or company has not, or is not, complying with Ontario securities law.<br />

1<br />

Criminal Code, ss. 380(1), 380(2) and 382.<br />

STIKEMAN ELLIOTT LLP<br />

<strong>LITIGATION</strong> <strong>UNLEASHED</strong><br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!