LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott
LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott
LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3<br />
THE<br />
OSC’S NEW POWERS:<br />
New offences, tougher sanctions<br />
In addition to the creation of the statutory rights of action described above, the amendments<br />
create additional offences under the Securities Act which may be prosecuted by the OSC and<br />
increase the availability of sanctions for non-compliance with the Securities Act.<br />
3.1 Overview of enforcement alternatives<br />
3.1.1 Penalties and disgorgement<br />
In its mandate to enforce requirements of the Securities Act and to protect the integrity of<br />
the capital markets, the OSC has at least three distinct enforcement routes:<br />
• Section 122: gives the Ontario Court of Justice a quasi-criminal jurisdiction to consider<br />
offences under the Securities Act;<br />
• Section 127: the OSC enforcement staff’s most commonly used enforcement route,<br />
which provides an OSC panel with administrative jurisdiction to conduct hearings and<br />
make determinations regarding non-compliance with the Securities Act as well as a variety<br />
of remedies; and<br />
• Section 128: the least-used enforcement route, which allows OSC enforcement staff to<br />
bring a quasi-civil proceeding before the Ontario Court of Justice seeking a declaration<br />
that there has been a breach of securities law.<br />
In addition to the enforcement remedies contained in the Securities Act, the Criminal Code<br />
contains provisions that are available in serious cases to prosecute wrongdoers for such<br />
crimes as conspiracy, market manipulation and fraud. 1<br />
3.1.2 Violations recognized prior to the amendments<br />
Prior to the amendments, s. 122 proceedings could be commenced for the offences of:<br />
• making a materially misleading or untrue statement to the OSC or to staff of the OSC,<br />
• making materially misleading or untrue statements in documents required to be<br />
furnished or filed under Ontario securities law with the OSC, or<br />
• contravening Ontario securities law (the “basket clause”).<br />
Prior to the amendments, s. 127 allowed the OSC to make orders where a person or<br />
company was found to have either:<br />
• failed to comply with Ontario securities law; or<br />
• acted in a manner inconsistent with the public interest (even though he, she or it had<br />
complied with Ontario securities law).<br />
Prior to the amendments, s. 128 allowed the OSC to apply to the Court for a declaration<br />
that a person or company has not, or is not, complying with Ontario securities law.<br />
1<br />
Criminal Code, ss. 380(1), 380(2) and 382.<br />
STIKEMAN ELLIOTT LLP<br />
<strong>LITIGATION</strong> <strong>UNLEASHED</strong><br />
27