07.08.2014 Views

LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott

LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott

LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

B-3 SUMMARY OF LIABILITIES<br />

TYPE OF CLAIM:<br />

CLAIMS AGAINST: MISREPRESENTATION – Non-core Document<br />

– Released by Influential Person<br />

Responsible Issuer<br />

Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />

misrepresentation, and that a director or officer of issuer authorized, permitted or<br />

acquiesced in the release (or where issuer is investment fund, manager authorized, permitted or<br />

acquiesced in release)<br />

Plaintiff proves issuer either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or deliberately<br />

avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />

Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Reasonable Investigation,<br />

Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without issuer’s knowledge,<br />

Derivative Information<br />

Director of<br />

Responsible Issuer<br />

Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />

misrepresentation, and that the director authorized, permitted or acquiesced in the release<br />

Plaintiff proves director either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or deliberately<br />

avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />

Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Director made a Reasonable Investigation,<br />

Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without director’s knowledge,<br />

Corrective Action, Derivative Information<br />

Officer of<br />

Responsible Issuer<br />

Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />

misrepresentation, and that the officer authorized, permitted or acquiesced in the release<br />

Plaintiff proves officer either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or deliberately<br />

avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />

Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Officer made a Reasonable Investigation,<br />

Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without officer’s knowledge,<br />

Corrective Action, Derivative Information<br />

Influential Person<br />

Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />

misrepresentation<br />

Plaintiff proves influential person either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or<br />

deliberately avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />

Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Influential Person made a Reasonable<br />

Investigation, Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without Influential<br />

Person’s knowledge, Corrective Action, Derivative Information<br />

56 <strong>LITIGATION</strong> <strong>UNLEASHED</strong> STIKEMAN ELLIOTT LLP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!