LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott
LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott
LITIGATION UNLEASHED - Stikeman Elliott
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B-3 SUMMARY OF LIABILITIES<br />
TYPE OF CLAIM:<br />
CLAIMS AGAINST: MISREPRESENTATION – Non-core Document<br />
– Released by Influential Person<br />
Responsible Issuer<br />
Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />
misrepresentation, and that a director or officer of issuer authorized, permitted or<br />
acquiesced in the release (or where issuer is investment fund, manager authorized, permitted or<br />
acquiesced in release)<br />
Plaintiff proves issuer either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or deliberately<br />
avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />
Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Reasonable Investigation,<br />
Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without issuer’s knowledge,<br />
Derivative Information<br />
Director of<br />
Responsible Issuer<br />
Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />
misrepresentation, and that the director authorized, permitted or acquiesced in the release<br />
Plaintiff proves director either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or deliberately<br />
avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />
Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Director made a Reasonable Investigation,<br />
Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without director’s knowledge,<br />
Corrective Action, Derivative Information<br />
Officer of<br />
Responsible Issuer<br />
Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />
misrepresentation, and that the officer authorized, permitted or acquiesced in the release<br />
Plaintiff proves officer either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or deliberately<br />
avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />
Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Officer made a Reasonable Investigation,<br />
Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without officer’s knowledge,<br />
Corrective Action, Derivative Information<br />
Influential Person<br />
Plaintiff proves it acquired or disposed of securities between release and correction of<br />
misrepresentation<br />
Plaintiff proves influential person either knew of misrepresentation at time of release or<br />
deliberately avoided acquiring knowledge or was guilty of gross misconduct<br />
Defences: Plaintiff knew of misrepresentation, Influential Person made a Reasonable<br />
Investigation, Forward-Looking Information, Reliance on Experts, Release without Influential<br />
Person’s knowledge, Corrective Action, Derivative Information<br />
56 <strong>LITIGATION</strong> <strong>UNLEASHED</strong> STIKEMAN ELLIOTT LLP