Table 1.3 Barron County Historical Population and Population Change, 1960 to 2008, by MCD Towns Year Percent Change 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2008 ‘60-‘70 ‘70-‘80 ‘80-‘90 ‘90-‘00 ‘00-‘08 Almena 673 731 776 773 910 991 8.6 6.2 -0.4 17.7 8.9 Arland 716 605 692 609 670 710 -15.5 14.4 -12.0 10.0 6.0 Barron 940 893 977 1,015 1,014 998 -5.0 9.4 3.9 -0.01 -1.6 Bear Lake 452 426 521 530 587 646 -5.8 22.3 1.7 10.8 10.1 Cedar Lake 379 423 617 741 944 1,120 11.6 45.9 20.1 27.4 18.6 Chetek 886 918 1,210 1,446 1,686 1,786 3.6 31.8 19.5 16.6 5.9 Clinton 808 757 851 849 920 1,015 -6.3 12.4 -0.2 8.4 10.3 Crystal Lake 742 712 756 700 778 810 -4.0 6.2 -7.4 11.1 4.1 Cumberland 902 910 909 884 942 959 0.9 -0.1 -2.8 6.6 1.8 Dallas 610 465 567 548 604 608 -23.8 21.9 -3.4 10.2 0.7 Dovre 526 539 526 561 680 798 2.5 -2.4 6.7 21.2 17.4 Doyle 447 426 455 460 498 540 -4.7 6.8 1.1 8.3 8.4 Lakeland 585 580 672 789 963 1,022 -0.9 15.9 17.4 22.1 6.1 Maple Grove 972 859 948 926 968 1,004 -11.6 10.4 -2.3 4.5 3.7 Maple Plain 453 493 577 610 876 946 8.8 17.0 5.7 43.6 8.0 Oak Grove 890 836 892 906 911 949 -6.1 6.7 1.6 0.01 4.2 Prairie Farm 684 594 634 567 603 616 -13.2 6.7 -10.6 6.3 2.2 Prairie Lake 858 923 1,076 1,129 1,369 1,584 7.6 16.6 4.9 21.3 15.7 Rice Lake 1,189 1,667 2,372 2,473 3,026 3,171 40.2 42.3 4.3 22.4 4.8 Sioux Creek 682 563 643 635 689 756 -17.4 14.2 -1.2 8.5 9.7 Stanfold 788 757 721 644 669 721 -3.9 -4.8 -10.7 3.9 7.8 Stanley 834 1,064 1,813 2,087 2,237 2,464 27.6 70.4 15.1 7.2 10.1 Sumner 572 465 556 550 598 692 -18.7 19.6 -1.1 8.7 15.7 Turtle Lake 718 673 587 621 622 650 -6.3 -12.8 5.8 0.01 4.5 Vance Creek 647 608 650 611 747 798 -6.0 6.9 -6.0 22.3 6.8 Subtotal: 17,953 17,887 20,998 21,664 24,511 26,354 -0.4 17.4 3.2 13.1 7.5 Villages Almena 398 423 526 625 720 751 6.3 24.3 18.8 15.2 4.3 Cameron 982 893 1,115 1,273 1,546 1,749 -9.1 24.9 14.2 21.5 13.1 Dallas 401 359 477 452 356 369 -10.5 32.9 -5.2 -21.2 3.7 Haugen 265 246 251 305 287 296 -7.2 2.0 21.5 -5.9 3.1 New Auburn (part) 0 0 14 26 15 23 0.0 1400.0 85.7 -42.3 53.3 Prairie Farm 350 426 387 494 508 531 21.7 -9.2 27.6 2.8 4.5 Turtle Lake (part) 691 637 762 811 1,000 1,011 -7.8 19.6 6.4 23.3 1.1 Subtotal: 3,087 2,984 3,532 3,986 4,432 4,730 -3.3 18.4 12.9 11.2 6.7 Cities Barron 2,338 2,337 2,595 2,986 3,248 3,321 0.0 11.0 15.1 8.8 2.2 Chetek 1729 1,630 1,931 1,953 2,180 2,259 -5.7 18.5 1.1 11.6 3.6 Cumberland 1,860 1,839 1,983 2,163 2,280 2,399 -1.1 7.8 9.1 5.4 5.2 Rice Lake 7,303 7,278 7,691 7,998 8,312 8,664 -0.3 5.7 4.0 3.9 4.2 Subtotal: 13,230 13,084 14,200 15,100 16,020 16,643 -1.1 8.5 6.3 6.1 3.9 Barron County* 34,270 33,955 38,730 40,750 44,963 78,811 -0.9 14.1 5.2 10.3 6.6 source: U.S. Census Bureau; 2007 <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Department of Administration Estimate 16 Issues and Opportunities Information
Table 1.4 Barron County Components of Population Change 1950 to 2000 1950 to 1960 to 1970 to 1980 to 1990 to Births 8,230 5,909 5,442 6,344 5,664 Deaths 3,401 3,774 4,110 4,286 5,000 Total Natural Increase 4,829 2,135 1,332 2,058 664 Natural Increase Rate 14.1% 6.3% 3.4% 5.3% 1.5% Net Migration -5,262 -2,450 3,443 -38 3,549 Net Migration Rate -15.4% -7.2% 9.0% -0.1% 7.9% Total Population Change -433 -315 4,775 2,020 4,213 Percent Population Change -1.3% -0.9% 14.1% 5.2% 9.4% source: <strong>Wisconsin</strong> Department of Health and Human Services Table 1.5 Barron County Historical Population by Age and Sex 1980 to 2000 Male Female Total Age 1980 1990 2000 1980 1990 2000 1980 1990 2000 0-4 1,552 1,529 1,312 1,517 1,371 1,232 3,069 2,900 2,544 5-9 1,496 1,886 1,541 1,418 1,640 1,468 2,914 3,526 3,009 10-14 1,593 1,600 1,785 1,438 1,552 1,690 3,031 3,152 3,475 15-19 1,899 1,488 1,938 1,792 1,342 1,716 3,691 2,830 3,654 20-24 1,557 1,127 1,185 1,554 1,017 1,138 3,111 2,144 2,323 25-29 1,483 1,398 1,144 1,417 1,468 1,123 2,900 2,866 2,267 30-34 1,276 1,653 1,361 1,226 1,625 1,294 2,502 3,278 2,665 35-44 1,910 2,895 3,597 1,948 2,827 3,529 3,858 5,722 7,126 45-54 1,718 1,899 3,138 1,836 1,923 3,045 3,554 3,822 6,181 55-59 909 838 1,176 1,053 945 1,195 1,962 1,783 2,371 60-64 957 901 922 1,098 938 1,062 2,055 1,839 1,984 65-74 1,642 1,640 1,747 1,840 1,989 1,904 3,482 3,629 3,651 75+ 1,094 1,283 1,428 1,507 1,976 2,295 2,601 3,259 3,723 Median Age 31.0 34.5 38.8 source: U.S. Census Bureau Table 1.6 Barron County Change in Age-Sex Structure 1970 to 2000 Change – Male Change – Female Total Change Total Pct Change Age 1980-90 1990-00 1980-90 1990-00 1980-90 1990-00 1980-90 1990-00 0-4 -23 -217 -146 -139 -169 -356 -5.5 -12.3 5-9 390 -345 222 -172 612 -517 21.0 -14.7 10-14 7 185 114 138 121 323 4.0 10.2 15-19 -411 450 -450 374 -861 824 -23.3 29.1 20-24 -430 58 -537 121 -967 179 -31.1 8.3 25-29 -85 -254 51 -345 -34 -599 -1.2 -20.9 30-34 377 -292 399 -331 776 -623 31.0 -19 35-44 985 702 879 702 1864 1,404 48.3 24.5 45-54 181 1,249 87 1,122 268 2,371 7.5 62.0 55-59 -71 338 -108 250 -179 588 -9.1 33.0 60-64 -56 21 -160 124 -216 145 -10.5 7.9 65-74 -2 107 149 -85 147 22 4.2 0.1 75+ 189 145 469 319 658 464 25.3 14.2 source: U.S. Census Bureau Barron County Conditions and Trends Report 17
- Page 1: BARRON COUNTY CONDITIONS AND TRENDS
- Page 4: Forward The Barron County Condition
- Page 8 and 9: Transit............................
- Page 10 and 11: Economic Data .....................
- Page 12 and 13: Table 1.22 - Median Household Incom
- Page 14 and 15: List of Maps 1.1 - Barron County Lo
- Page 16 and 17: x Table of Contents
- Page 19 and 20: 1. ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES INFORMA
- Page 21 and 22: Socio-Economic Profile Population A
- Page 23 and 24: The rate of growth for Turtle Lake
- Page 25 and 26: Figure 1.4 Barron County Racial Pop
- Page 27 and 28: Although the Decennial Census’s s
- Page 29 and 30: Population projections are, at best
- Page 31 and 32: leave as other opportunities open u
- Page 33: Data Tables Table 1.1 Barron County
- Page 37 and 38: Table 1.7 continued Population by A
- Page 39 and 40: Table 1.8 Population by Age and Sex
- Page 41 and 42: Table 1.8 continued Population by A
- Page 43 and 44: Table 1.9A continued Percent Change
- Page 45 and 46: Table 1.9B Percent Change in Age/Se
- Page 47 and 48: Table 1.9B continued Percent Change
- Page 49 and 50: Table 1.11 Household Projections -
- Page 51 and 52: Table 1.12C Barron County Race Char
- Page 53 and 54: Table 1.13 continued Educational At
- Page 55 and 56: Table 1.13 continued Educational At
- Page 57 and 58: Table 1.13 continued Educational At
- Page 59 and 60: Table 1.13 continued Educational At
- Page 61 and 62: Table 1.14 continued Labor Force -
- Page 63 and 64: Table 1.14 continued Labor Force -
- Page 65 and 66: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 67 and 68: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 69 and 70: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 71 and 72: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 73 and 74: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 75 and 76: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 77 and 78: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 79 and 80: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 81 and 82: Table 1.16 continued Employment By
- Page 83 and 84: Table 1.17 Employment By Occupation
- Page 85 and 86:
Table 1.17 continued Employment By
- Page 87 and 88:
Table 1.17 continued Employment By
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 1.17 continued Employment By
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 1.17 continued Employment By
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 1.17 continued Employment By
- Page 95 and 96:
Table 1.17 continued Employment By
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 1.20 Households by Household
- Page 99 and 100:
2. HOUSING INFORMATION Element Cont
- Page 101 and 102:
Historically, the number of seasona
- Page 103 and 104:
or not fully paid for. The U.S. Bur
- Page 105 and 106:
of Almena, Cedar Lake, Chetek, Crys
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 2.2 Seasonal Units - 2000 - B
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 2.4 Units in Structure - 2000
- Page 111 and 112:
Table 2.6 Housing Value of Specifie
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 2.8 Owner-Occupied Housing Co
- Page 115 and 116:
Table 2.10 Housing Unit Projections
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 2.12 Housing Characteristics
- Page 119 and 120:
Table 2.12 continued Housing Charac
- Page 121 and 122:
Table 2.12 continued Housing Charac
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 2.12 continued Housing Charac
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 2.12 continued Housing Charac
- Page 127 and 128:
3. TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION Eleme
- Page 129 and 130:
Background Data/Existing Conditions
- Page 131 and 132:
Map 3.2 - Barron County Rural Funct
- Page 133 and 134:
Table 3.3 - Road Miles by Functiona
- Page 135 and 136:
Bridges community expressed concern
- Page 137 and 138:
• Rustic Road 83 follows 13 3/4 -
- Page 139 and 140:
Private transit is offered by the S
- Page 141 and 142:
Map 3.5 - Barron County Bicycling C
- Page 143 and 144:
Safety While traffic volumes have c
- Page 145 and 146:
Commuting Patterns Residents of Bar
- Page 147 and 148:
Map 3.7 - Railroad Ownership in Wes
- Page 149 and 150:
WisDOT’s Five-Year Airport Improv
- Page 151 and 152:
• Provide sufficient capacity in
- Page 153 and 154:
4. UTILITIES AND COMMUNITY FACILITI
- Page 155 and 156:
On-Site Septic Systems Nearly all d
- Page 157 and 158:
facilities such as water towers. Th
- Page 159 and 160:
Incorporated municipalities may cre
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 4.3 - Telephone Providers in
- Page 163 and 164:
Inventory of Educational Facilities
- Page 165 and 166:
Cooperative Educational Service Age
- Page 167 and 168:
Inventory of Other Community Facili
- Page 169 and 170:
Barron County has also periodically
- Page 171 and 172:
Responders receive 59 hours of cert
- Page 173 and 174:
Communities may need to consider po
- Page 175 and 176:
elderly, younger adults with physic
- Page 177 and 178:
specific to a community will be add
- Page 179 and 180:
Table 4.10 - Primary Parks in Barro
- Page 181 and 182:
Cemeteries The following are the ce
- Page 183 and 184:
Town of Stanfold Stanfold Lutheran
- Page 185 and 186:
highway, public works, and maintena
- Page 187 and 188:
Map 4.3 - Natural Gas Service in We
- Page 189 and 190:
Map 4.5 - Barron County Fire Distri
- Page 191 and 192:
Map 4.7 - Barron County First Respo
- Page 193 and 194:
5. AGRICULTURAL, NATURAL, AND CULTU
- Page 195 and 196:
Agricultural Resources The Barron C
- Page 197 and 198:
Table 5.3 Assessed Agricultural Par
- Page 199 and 200:
Barron County direct market farms t
- Page 201 and 202:
likely to be highly suited for agri
- Page 203 and 204:
Surface Geology The surface geology
- Page 205 and 206:
Freeon-Magnor-Newood Association De
- Page 207 and 208:
Watersheds & Surface Waters Lakes,
- Page 209 and 210:
County or State programs to protect
- Page 211 and 212:
Groundwater Groundwater is an impor
- Page 213 and 214:
Floodplains One sensitive land feat
- Page 215 and 216:
Barron County Conditions and Trends
- Page 217 and 218:
maintain sufficient grasslands for
- Page 219 and 220:
Parks and Recreational Resources Vi
- Page 221 and 222:
Table 5.11 - Site and Structures on
- Page 223 and 224:
Summary The Barron County Land Use
- Page 225 and 226:
• Between 1990 and 2007 the towns
- Page 227 and 228:
6. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION
- Page 229 and 230:
The Wisconsin economy grew rapidly
- Page 231 and 232:
commodity prices, has created a bud
- Page 233 and 234:
Wisconsin, through the Department o
- Page 235 and 236:
Table 6.1 - Barron County Education
- Page 237 and 238:
Employment Trends Of Barron County
- Page 239 and 240:
Commuting Patterns Of Barron County
- Page 241 and 242:
Employment by Industry As shown in
- Page 243 and 244:
Table 6.5- Barron County Top Employ
- Page 245 and 246:
Employment by Occupation Like emplo
- Page 247 and 248:
Table 6.7 West Central Wisconsin WD
- Page 249 and 250:
is based on the greatest percent ch
- Page 251 and 252:
Figure 6.10 Traveler Expenditures i
- Page 253 and 254:
Summary The data presented in this
- Page 255 and 256:
Table 6.10 - Contaminated Sites in
- Page 257 and 258:
Table 6.10 - Contaminated Sites in
- Page 259 and 260:
7. LAND USE INFORMATION Element Con
- Page 261 and 262:
Table 7.3—Leading Percentage Loss
- Page 263 and 264:
land. While the City of Cumberland
- Page 265 and 266:
agricultural land. Forested land in
- Page 267 and 268:
Summary Land development, the deman
- Page 269 and 270:
Land Use by Municipality Discussion
- Page 271 and 272:
experienced a 55 percent increase i
- Page 273 and 274:
Village Land Use Summaries Almena T
- Page 275 and 276:
Land Use Tables Table 7.5 Assessed
- Page 277 and 278:
Table 7.7 Assessed Industrial Acres
- Page 279 and 280:
Table 7.9 Assessed Forest Parcels a
- Page 281 and 282:
Table 7.11 Agricultural Land Sales
- Page 283 and 284:
Table 7.14 Land Assessed Value per