Technology Tested - RMOTC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Section 34 Subsurface Interpretation Well log cross section above BYU 2D seismic cross sections
Pipeline Leak Detection Sensor companies participating: • En’Urga Inc. • ITT Industries, Inc. • LaSen, Inc. • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory • Physical Sciences Inc. S O U T H W E S T R E S E A R C H I N S T I T U T E ® SAN ANTONIO DETROIT HOUSTON WASHINGTON, DC
Page 1 and 2: Playing Hide and Seek with the Hole
Page 3 and 4: The Hole-in-the-Wall Gang Doug Jim
Page 5 and 6: Hiding: CO2 Sequestration - Science
Page 7 and 8: Existing infrastructure and data 50
Page 9 and 10: Tensleep EOR / storage demonstratio
Page 11 and 12: Saline Aquifer Storage Test • Sal
Page 13 and 14: Reservoir Heterogeneity: LIDAR mapp
Page 15 and 16: Reservoir Characterization and Mode
Page 17 and 18: Sample Cross Section A-A’
Page 19 and 20: University of Houston, Allied Geoph
Page 21 and 22: BYU High-Resolution Seismic • 48-
Page 23: Example of High-Resolution Seismic
Page 27 and 28: Advisory Board • American Gas Ass
Page 29 and 30: Virtual Pipeline Leak Sites Leak Si
Page 31 and 32: Summary • The “virtual pipeline
Page 33 and 34: Instrumentation Sensitivity to Leak
Page 35 and 36: Seeking (New Technology): Microhole
Page 37 and 38: Los Alamos Microdrilling Field Team
Page 39 and 40: A RMOTC pulling unit and Los Alamos
Page 41 and 42: Dennis Tool Company equipment assem
Page 43 and 44: Foreground. LBNL Microgeophone arra
Page 45 and 46: RMOTC Test Results • Mechanical d
Page 47 and 48: Concentric Pipe Jacketed Section 6
Page 49 and 50: Setup for Generating Hydrate Plug
Page 51 and 52: Success! Subsequent mitigation test
Page 53 and 54: 24-AX-10: A Problem Well • Deviat
Page 55 and 56: The Key to Success: Tubing Rotator
Page 57 and 58: The Results 24-AX-10 PRODUCTION SIN
Page 59: RMOTC Datasets 3D Seismic Teapot Do

Technology Tested - RMOTC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?