Technology Tested - RMOTC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Important Points • Vendors were asked to identify sites that they believed were natural gas pipeline leaks, which were matched up with the intended leaks for that day. “Positive” indications that did not correspond with leak sites were investigated. Most of these sites did not contain gas, but were old water pipes, fence posts, abandoned well sites, patches of dirt, etc. • There was evidence that some of the equipment providers may have been using visual clues to look for leaks, as opposed to conducting a “blind” search, accounting for some of the false positives reported. • You can access the full report at: http://www.rmotc.com/Library/Test_Reports.html Under “Energy Assurance”, “Remote Sensor Gas LDS” (PDF) Thanks to: Rodney Anderson and Rick Baker (DOE NETL)
Seeking (New <strong>Technology</strong>): Microhole Drilling
Page 1 and 2: Playing Hide and Seek with the Hole
Page 3 and 4: The Hole-in-the-Wall Gang Doug Jim
Page 5 and 6: Hiding: CO2 Sequestration - Science
Page 7 and 8: Existing infrastructure and data 50
Page 9 and 10: Tensleep EOR / storage demonstratio
Page 11 and 12: Saline Aquifer Storage Test • Sal
Page 13 and 14: Reservoir Heterogeneity: LIDAR mapp
Page 15 and 16: Reservoir Characterization and Mode
Page 17 and 18: Sample Cross Section A-A’
Page 19 and 20: University of Houston, Allied Geoph
Page 21 and 22: BYU High-Resolution Seismic • 48-
Page 23 and 24: Example of High-Resolution Seismic
Page 25 and 26: Pipeline Leak Detection Sensor comp
Page 27 and 28: Advisory Board • American Gas Ass
Page 29 and 30: Virtual Pipeline Leak Sites Leak Si
Page 31 and 32: Summary • The “virtual pipeline
Page 33: Instrumentation Sensitivity to Leak
Page 37 and 38: Los Alamos Microdrilling Field Team
Page 39 and 40: A RMOTC pulling unit and Los Alamos
Page 41 and 42: Dennis Tool Company equipment assem
Page 43 and 44: Foreground. LBNL Microgeophone arra
Page 45 and 46: RMOTC Test Results • Mechanical d
Page 47 and 48: Concentric Pipe Jacketed Section 6
Page 49 and 50: Setup for Generating Hydrate Plug
Page 51 and 52: Success! Subsequent mitigation test
Page 53 and 54: 24-AX-10: A Problem Well • Deviat
Page 55 and 56: The Key to Success: Tubing Rotator
Page 57 and 58: The Results 24-AX-10 PRODUCTION SIN
Page 59: RMOTC Datasets 3D Seismic Teapot Do

Technology Tested - RMOTC

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?