04.09.2014 Views

Technology Tested - RMOTC

Technology Tested - RMOTC

Technology Tested - RMOTC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>RMOTC</strong> Test Results<br />

• Mechanical<br />

difficulties with<br />

loss of jets in<br />

bits<br />

• Surface<br />

mechanical<br />

problems fixed<br />

• Increases in<br />

penetration<br />

rates of 2 -6<br />

times over a<br />

variety of<br />

formations<br />

Drilling Rate (ft/hr)<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

156.0<br />

120.0<br />

Crow<br />

Mountain<br />

Sand<br />

49.8<br />

55.1<br />

High Pressure Drilling vs Conventional<br />

77.7<br />

61.9<br />

66.0<br />

39.8 39.3<br />

13.5 14.8 12.9 13.3 13.8 14.1 14.1<br />

Crow<br />

Mountain<br />

Sand/Alcova<br />

Limestone<br />

Red Peaks<br />

Shale<br />

Red Peaks<br />

Shale<br />

Formation<br />

Red Peaks<br />

Shale<br />

Red Peaks<br />

Shale<br />

Jet Assisted Drilling Rate<br />

Conventional Drilling Rate<br />

Rate Ratio<br />

Red Peaks<br />

Shale<br />

Goose Egg<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Drilling Rate Ratio

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!