Documentation [PDF] - Canada France Hawaii Telescope ...
Documentation [PDF] - Canada France Hawaii Telescope ...
Documentation [PDF] - Canada France Hawaii Telescope ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Wide field<br />
External rms errors with respect to SDSS-DR8<br />
σ u ∗ σ g σ r σ i σ z<br />
rms [mag.] rms [mag.] rms [mag.] rms [mag.] rms [mag.]<br />
W1 0.016 0.008 0.009 0.006 0.010<br />
W2 0.011 0.005 0.004 0.005 0.012<br />
W3 0.009 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.005<br />
W4 0.009 0.003 0.007 0.006 0.005<br />
Table 12: External rms errors of the CFHTLS T0007 u ∗ , g, r, i and z-band Wide surveys. They are derived<br />
from the variance of the magnitude offset distributions between the SDSS-DR8 and CFHTLS-T0007, in the W1,<br />
W2, W3 and W4 fields. The error estimates only use 115/171 Wide fields. In contrast with the internal errors,<br />
most common source loci are outside the noisy overlapping regions, and the selected stellar sources used for the<br />
comparison are brighter.<br />
4.4.4 External photometric errors<br />
The external photometric errors are derived from the rms of the mean CFHTLS-SDSS magnitude offset<br />
values, δ m=u ∗ ,g,r,i/y,z, in each Wide field separately. They are measured by adding the 115 offsets to<br />
CFHTLS-SDSS common sources of each relevant tile and then by computing the rms of the CFHTLS-<br />
SDSS residual over the tile.<br />
The external errors are quoted for each Wide in Table 12. As expected the g, r and i-bands are on<br />
the average better than the u ∗ and z. W1 seems slightly worse than W2, W3 and W4, probably due<br />
to contamination by several outliers reported in the previous section. The overall external field to field<br />
calibration is around 1.5% in u ∗ and z, and below 1.0% in g, r and i/y.<br />
4.4.5 CFHTLS Wide photometric precision<br />
To summarize, the systematic photometric precision in the CFHTLS Wide T0007 calibration (or field to<br />
field scatter) can be measured using :<br />
• the dispersion of the tile magnitude offsets with SDSS (section 4.4.4 and table 12)<br />
• the dispersion of the the magnitude offsets between adjacent fields measured in the overlapping<br />
regions (section 4.4.2 and table 9)<br />
These two measurements are in good agreement and show field to field scatters of :<br />
• 1.5% in u∗ and z bands<br />
• 1% in g, r and i/y bands<br />
56