10.09.2014 Views

Download - Tanker Operator

Download - Tanker Operator

Download - Tanker Operator

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TECHNOLOGY - NAVAIDS<br />

What’s the latest<br />

with ECDIS?<br />

ECDIS equipment has been on the market since 1998 but for most shipping companies<br />

it remains as something to fit in the future, if at all. Probably rather less than 10%<br />

of vessels are using ECDIS and of these only a small proportion are using ENCs,<br />

which are the official vector charts, writes Andy Norris.<br />

There now seems to be<br />

less misunderstanding<br />

concerning electronic<br />

charts. Most bridge<br />

officers and technical<br />

superintendents know that ECDIS<br />

is the IMO approved electronic<br />

chart system. When displaying<br />

updated ENCs, which are<br />

inherently authorised by national<br />

hydrographic offices, use of<br />

ECDIS can replace the use of<br />

paper charts.<br />

In practice, flag states set the<br />

detailed requirements,<br />

particularly those regarding<br />

backup, which could for instance<br />

be another ECDIS or a suitable<br />

set of paper charts. It is<br />

interesting that the main takeup<br />

of ECDIS has been on ships<br />

that have safety high on the<br />

agenda, including tankers and<br />

cruise liners.<br />

ENC coverage during February this year.<br />

The IMO Safety of Navigation<br />

sub-committee (NAV) has<br />

recently looked at both the safety<br />

and the cost effectiveness of<br />

ECDIS, and favourably<br />

commented on the positive<br />

results from formal safety<br />

assessments undertaken by<br />

member states on various<br />

examples of vessel: an 80,000<br />

dwt oil tanker, a 4,000 dwt<br />

products tanker, a 75,000 dwt<br />

bulk carrier and passenger ships<br />

covering a range of sizes.<br />

RNC Coverage<br />

So if ECDIS is so good, why has<br />

it yet to catch on? The most<br />

valid reason is that ENC<br />

coverage is not complete.<br />

However, the situation is rapidly<br />

improving. The illustration<br />

shows the coverage as at<br />

February 2007. The red areas<br />

show the ENC cells currently<br />

available and the blue areas<br />

those cells under preparation.<br />

An up-to-date version of this<br />

diagram can be downloaded<br />

from http://ih-net-www.<br />

hidrografico.pt/website/icenc/<br />

viewer.htm.<br />

Over 6,000 ENC cells are<br />

available for use; this is<br />

increasing by about 1,000 every<br />

year. It is seen that much of the<br />

coastline of Europe, Asia and<br />

North America is already covered<br />

at a detailed level. Many ocean<br />

areas are also covered by<br />

overview charts.<br />

IMO's Maritime Safety<br />

Committee (MSC) is currently<br />

determining whether there should<br />

be a phased introduction of<br />

compulsory carriage requirements<br />

for ECDIS on all vessels. It has<br />

already mandated that ECDIS is<br />

fitted to high speed craft from 1st<br />

July 2010. NAV is giving<br />

preliminary consideration to the<br />

proposal, with a view to<br />

submitting a report to MSC<br />

in 2008.<br />

The discussion at NAV has<br />

already emphasised that 'ENC<br />

coverage was a necessary<br />

prerequisite for the introduction<br />

of a mandatory carriage<br />

requirement for ECDIS', although<br />

what is meant by 'ENC coverage'<br />

is a debating point.<br />

The International Hydrographic<br />

Organisation (IHO), which<br />

represents the national<br />

hydrographic offices, recognises<br />

the importance of this occurring<br />

in the short term.<br />

Rear Admiral Kenneth Barbor,<br />

who is a director of the<br />

International Hydrographic<br />

Bureau, the secretariat for IHO,<br />

told TANKER<strong>Operator</strong> that "The<br />

IHO is conducting an extensive<br />

assessment of ENC coverage<br />

that will, at the request of IMO,<br />

be recorded in an on-line<br />

catalogue. From this<br />

assessment, areas where ENC<br />

coverage is not projected to be<br />

sufficient to support HSC or<br />

international shipping will be<br />

targeted for production through<br />

bilateral or regional agreements<br />

to ensure their timely<br />

availability".<br />

If coverage is seen to be<br />

sufficient in 2008, when MSC<br />

debates the possible mandatory fit<br />

of ECDIS, it will undoubtedly<br />

have a significant impact on<br />

its decisions.<br />

March 2007 • TANKER<strong>Operator</strong> 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!