25.09.2014 Views

PIP Joint Arthroplasty Revision Using - Small Bone Innovations

PIP Joint Arthroplasty Revision Using - Small Bone Innovations

PIP Joint Arthroplasty Revision Using - Small Bone Innovations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clinical Case Review:<br />

<strong>PIP</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Arthroplasty</strong> <strong>Revision</strong> <strong>Using</strong> SR <strong>PIP</strong> Implant Sytem<br />

<strong>Small</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Innovations</strong>, Inc. : SR <strong>PIP</strong> Implant Sytem<br />

Before<br />

After<br />

Dr. Sunjay Berdia<br />

Adjunct Assistant Professor at Uniformed Services University<br />

of the Health Sciences in Bethesda, MD


Patient History<br />

Patient is a 53 year old, right-hand dominant female who sustained<br />

a distal radius fracture. She underwent open reduction<br />

internal fixation of this fracture but she subsequently developed<br />

severe complex regional pain syndrome in that extremity.<br />

Although with time her wrist and digital range of motion improved,<br />

she developed progressive degenerative arthritis in<br />

her middle finger <strong>PIP</strong> and DIP <strong>Joint</strong>s. Her <strong>PIP</strong> joint became increasely<br />

more painful with a concomitant loss of motion. She<br />

was initially treated conservatively with therapy, NSAIDS, and<br />

then finally with cortisone injections.<br />

Preoperative Write Up and X-Rays<br />

Fig. 1: <strong>PIP</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> AP Xray<br />

Fig. 2: <strong>PIP</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> Lateral Xray<br />

Physical examination revealed a <strong>PIP</strong> range of motion from<br />

5 degrees of full extension to 65 degrees of flexion. The <strong>PIP</strong><br />

<strong>Joint</strong> was ulnar deviated 10 degrees. Figures 1 and 2 show<br />

the posteroanterior and lateral radiographs. As she had failed<br />

conservative treatment, the decision was made to proceed<br />

with a joint replacement using the Pyrocarbon <strong>PIP</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> Replacement.<br />

A dorsal tendon splitting approach was used to carry<br />

out the joint replacement. Figures 3 and 4 show postoperative<br />

posteroanterior and lateral radiographs. By appropriate cuts<br />

and tightening of the radial collateral ligament, the ulnar deviation<br />

deformity was corrected. Although the proximal component<br />

seems slightly proud, the stem was tightly fixed into<br />

the canal.<br />

The patient did well in the immediate postoperative period.<br />

Her pain was alleviated. Her range of motion at 3 months was<br />

from 10 degrees of full extension to 75 degrees of flexion. At<br />

5 months, she started to exhibit signs of radiograph loosening<br />

(See Fig. 5 - 6). Therapy on the finger was halted and she was<br />

instructed to rest the finger as much as possible.<br />

Fig. 3: Postoperative AP Xray<br />

Fig. 4: Postoperative Lateral Xray<br />

She was followed using serial radiographs. Even with these<br />

precautions, she showed continued “windshield wiper” loosening<br />

on these radiographs. At 12 months post-operative, (See<br />

Fig. 7 - 8), the decision was then made to revise the arthroplasty<br />

before imminent catastrophic implant failure. Preoperative<br />

physical examination revealed a <strong>PIP</strong> range of motion from 15<br />

degrees of full extension to 55 degrees of flexion. Options<br />

that were then contemplated included using a silicone replacement<br />

or a cemented <strong>PIP</strong> Surface Replacement <strong>Arthroplasty</strong><br />

(SRA) from SBi. Preference was given to the SBi SR <strong>PIP</strong> because<br />

of the potential increase in range of motion, lack of silicone<br />

synovitis, lack of silicone implant breakage, and patient age<br />

and activity level.<br />

SBi SR <strong>PIP</strong> <strong>Arthroplasty</strong> was performed on November 13,<br />

2008.<br />

Fig. 5: <strong>PIP</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> Loosening AP Xray<br />

Fig. 6: <strong>PIP</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> Loosening Lateral Xray<br />

Fig. 7: Windshield Wiper AP Xray<br />

Fig. 8: Windshield Wiper Lateral Xray


Operative Technique<br />

A dorsal tendon splitting approach was again utilized. In order to<br />

gain adequate exposure, the central slip insertion was elevated periosteally<br />

for later repair. The pyrocarbon implant was easy removed<br />

as both components were loose (See Fig. 9).<br />

As the collaterals were in good condition and tension, the decision<br />

was made to proceed using the SRA implant. As the pyrocarbon<br />

is larger than the SRA implant, no additional resurfacing cuts were<br />

necessary. Broaching was attempted but due to loosening within<br />

the canal no broaching was necessary. Any pseudocapsule within<br />

the canal was cleaned with a fine curette so as to promote good<br />

interdigitization at cement-bone interface.<br />

Fig. 9: Intraoperative Photo: Pyrocarbon<br />

Removal<br />

Fig. 10: Intraoperative Photo: Repairing<br />

the Central Slip<br />

Trials were placed temporarily within the canal. An implant size 2 was<br />

chosen based on the best fit to the exposed parts of the proximal and<br />

distal phalangeal metaphysis. The length of the SRA proximal component<br />

stem is longer than the implant. As such, the stem would be<br />

able to go past the “windshield wiper” changes and minimize any stress<br />

risers. Additional steps were taken to repair the central slip. Prior to cementing,<br />

two holes were created at the insertion of the central slip and<br />

a non-absorbable suture was passed through the holes (See Fig. 10).<br />

Fig. 11: Intraoperative Photo: Cementing<br />

Both components were cemented in place at the same time so that the<br />

appropriate length could be determined (See Fig. 11). Prior to cement<br />

hardening, a partial cement mantle was built manually on the proximal<br />

side because of the bone deficiency (See Fig. 12).<br />

Intra-operative radiographs were taken repeatedly including after final<br />

implantation and they confirmed no cement extravasation, especially<br />

on the volar aspect of the proximal phalanx at the level of the<br />

“windshield wiper” changes. Postoperative radiographs seen in Fig. 13<br />

and 14 show a well seated and positioned implant.<br />

Surgery time was 60 minutes.<br />

Fig. 12: Intraoperative Photo: Cement Mantle<br />

Fig. 13: Postoperative AP<br />

SR <strong>PIP</strong> Xray<br />

Fig. 14: Postoperative Lateral<br />

SR <strong>PIP</strong> Xray


Post-Operative Protocol<br />

Patient started 4 days postop with a dynamic splinting protocol during the day and a resting splint at night-time. The dynamic<br />

splinting protocol protects the central slip repair. The patient was extremely pleased with the results and was allowed to return to<br />

full activities after 6 weeks. At 3 months, her range of motion was 0 to 65 degrees of flexion. She continued with the therapy. At<br />

6 months follow-up (See Fig. 15 - 16) her range of motion is 10 degrees of full extension to 75 degrees of full flexion. There was no<br />

clinical evidence of instability, loosening or subsidence.<br />

In this case, the SR <strong>PIP</strong> implant has resolved the <strong>PIP</strong> joint pain, increased ROM, and provided a stable joint.<br />

Fig. 15: Postoperative AP SR <strong>PIP</strong> Xray: 6 Months<br />

Fig. 16: Postoperative Lateral SR <strong>PIP</strong> Xray: 6 Months<br />

<strong>Small</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Innovations</strong>, Inc.<br />

1380 South Pennsylvania Ave.<br />

Morrisville, PA<br />

(215) 428-1791/ Fax (215) 428-1795<br />

SBi Customer Service: (800) 778-8837<br />

Technical Support: (866) SBi-TIPS<br />

www.totalsmallbone.com<br />

<strong>Small</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Innovations</strong> International<br />

ZA Les Bruyères - BP 28<br />

01960 Péronnas, France<br />

Tel: +33 (0) 474 21 58 19<br />

Fax: +33 (0) 474 21 43 12<br />

Caution: United States federal law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician.<br />

SR <strong>PIP</strong> is a Humanitarian Use Only Device.<br />

Copyright© 2009 <strong>Small</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Innovations</strong>, Inc. All rights reserved.<br />

MKT 10870 Rev. A 8/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!