Comparisons FERMI SURFACES, ELECTRON-HOLE ASYMMETRY, AND… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 79, 115122 2009 Γ-X a R-M b X R Γ M X R B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy (eV) 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy (eV) B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy (eV) k F 1 k F 2 k F 3 k F 4 1.0 X Γ X R M R s<strong>of</strong>t x-ray ARPES, R. FIG. Eguchi 3. Color onl<strong>in</strong>e a <strong>and</strong> et bal, EDCs along 2009 -X <strong>and</strong> R-M direction, respectively. c <strong>and</strong> d The <strong>in</strong>tensity maps <strong>of</strong> EDCs. k F1-k F4 <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> MDC peak positions at E F. we measured ARPES at a fixed photon energy <strong>of</strong> 630 eV k z 0 <strong>and</strong> 710 eV k z /c. The FS mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> horizontal k x -k y planes “” <strong>and</strong> “” <strong>of</strong> Brillou<strong>in</strong> zone <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1a t’/t=0.15 was obta<strong>in</strong>ed as shown <strong>in</strong> Figs. 2b <strong>and</strong> 2c. In “” plane, FIG. 2. Color onl<strong>in</strong>e Fermi-surface mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a a vertical <strong>the</strong> small electron FS around po<strong>in</strong>t is aga<strong>in</strong> observed. This k result <strong>in</strong>dicates that <strong>the</strong> 3D spherelike FS around po<strong>in</strong>t can z-k x plane “” <strong>and</strong> b horizontal k x-k y planes “” <strong>and</strong> c “” <strong>of</strong> Brillou<strong>in</strong> zone <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1a. Solid white l<strong>in</strong>es correspond to <strong>the</strong> be observed by ARPES experimentally. The squarelike <strong>in</strong>tense area around M po<strong>in</strong>ts obta<strong>in</strong>ed from raw data without cubic Brillou<strong>in</strong> zone <strong>and</strong> dotted white l<strong>in</strong>es correspond to <strong>the</strong> highsymmetry l<strong>in</strong>es. k F1-k F4 <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>the</strong> MDC peak positions at E F <strong>in</strong> symmetrization corresponds to <strong>the</strong> projection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hole FS Figs. 3c <strong>and</strong> 3d. Blue gray l<strong>in</strong>es show nest<strong>in</strong>g character hole centered at R po<strong>in</strong>t. In “” plane, no small FS is observed. LNO FSs. All <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity maps are measured data over <strong>the</strong> displayed Instead large FSs centered at R po<strong>in</strong>t were observed. From range <strong>and</strong> no symmetrization has been used to obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> maps. <strong>the</strong> complete data set <strong>of</strong> energy <strong>and</strong> angle-dependent FS RH maps, <strong>the</strong> experimental FS obta<strong>in</strong>ed by s<strong>of</strong>t x-ray ARPES is to <strong>the</strong> Ni 3d6t 2g b<strong>and</strong>s. In addition, EDCs for 600–660 eV <strong>in</strong> overall agreement with that predicted by <strong>the</strong> b<strong>and</strong> clearly show a dispersive b<strong>and</strong> cross<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> E F arrows calculation. 24 However, <strong>the</strong> actual b<strong>and</strong> dispersions reveal an around <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t. This dispersive b<strong>and</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>in</strong> Ni 3d important difference <strong>in</strong> electron <strong>and</strong> hole FSs as discussed <strong>in</strong> e g states <strong>and</strong> forms a small electron pocket as predicted by <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>the</strong> local-density 4 approximation LDA b<strong>and</strong> calculation. The In order to discuss <strong>the</strong> b<strong>and</strong> structures form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se FSs, b<strong>and</strong> disappears for energies below 600 eV <strong>and</strong> above 660 we measured <strong>the</strong> ARPES <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> high-symmetry l<strong>in</strong>es with eV photon energy <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity is observed detailed momentum steps <strong>and</strong> an energy resolution E close to <strong>the</strong> M po<strong>in</strong>t at h=570 <strong>and</strong> 700 eV. 150 meV. The EDCs Figs. 3a <strong>and</strong> 3b <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensity plots Figs. 3c <strong>and</strong> 3d along -X <strong>and</strong> R-M directions 2 Figure 2a shows <strong>the</strong> FS mapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a vertical k z -k x plane “” <strong>of</strong> Brillou<strong>in</strong> zone as shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1a, which is are shown <strong>in</strong> Fig. 3. The FS cross<strong>in</strong>g k F po<strong>in</strong>ts are labeled as obta<strong>in</strong>ed by a plot <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>tensity from −0.05 to k F 1-k F 4. The <strong>in</strong>tensity plots <strong>in</strong> both directions Figs. 3c <strong>and</strong> 0.05 eV b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energy <strong>in</strong> EDCs. A small circle centered at 3d show an <strong>in</strong>tense feature around 0.0–0.2 eV at <strong>and</strong> M po<strong>in</strong>t is observed, while no 0.2 <strong>in</strong>tensity is observed 0.1 around <strong>the</strong> 0.0po<strong>in</strong>ts, correspond<strong>in</strong>g 0.1 to <strong>the</strong> electron 0.2 t’/t b<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> hole b<strong>and</strong> X po<strong>in</strong>t. The existence <strong>of</strong> a nearly spherical small FS centered at po<strong>in</strong>t, correspond<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> electron FS, was pre- bottom at M po<strong>in</strong>t is around 0.25 eV, <strong>the</strong> b<strong>and</strong> bottom at derived from Ni 3d e g states, respectively. While <strong>the</strong> b<strong>and</strong> dicted by2 b<strong>and</strong> calculations. 24 From photon energy po<strong>in</strong>t is not at 0.25 eV. The <strong>in</strong>tensity rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> high b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>genergy region about 0.5–1.0 eV at po<strong>in</strong>t Fig. 3c, <strong>in</strong>- k z -dependent ARPES measurements, we can decide <strong>the</strong> photon energy trac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> -X <strong>and</strong> X-M directions as shown dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s extend to high b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g energies. Because <strong>the</strong> t 2g b<strong>and</strong>s also appear above 0.5 eV at X po<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>in</strong> Fig. 1b. 4 In order to observe <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>-plane cuts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> FSs, <strong>the</strong> 6 115122-3 c d S/T 3 2 1 1 2 3 optics, D. Ouellette et al, 2010 LNO 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 t’/t “Hole like” Hall conductivity “Electron like” <strong>the</strong>rmopower
Nest<strong>in</strong>g Large fermi surface conta<strong>in</strong>s ra<strong>the</strong>r flat portions Approximate “nest<strong>in</strong>g” leads to a large susceptibility at some wavevectors, <strong>and</strong> a tendency to CDW or SDW order