Innovation and Legislation: Standardization in ... - The Bolin Group
Innovation and Legislation: Standardization in ... - The Bolin Group
Innovation and Legislation: Standardization in ... - The Bolin Group
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Why does Samsung place a high emphasis on st<strong>and</strong>ardization? First, because st<strong>and</strong>ards facilitate<br />
market acceptance <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong> the markets <strong>in</strong> which their products can be sold. Second, because<br />
their customers have become well educated about st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> are now dem<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g st<strong>and</strong>ardization<br />
of products they purchase.<br />
Strategic st<strong>and</strong>ardization isn‘t just about chang<strong>in</strong>g technologies or bus<strong>in</strong>ess strategies. It also <strong>in</strong>volves<br />
a change of m<strong>in</strong>dset by those who set company strategies, those who implement the strategies, <strong>and</strong><br />
those who participate <strong>in</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardization. Roger Marks of NIST stated that the new way of do<strong>in</strong>g<br />
th<strong>in</strong>gs doesn’t just lie <strong>in</strong> new processes, but <strong>in</strong> the way the people themselves work <strong>and</strong> th<strong>in</strong>k. This is<br />
true. We can have all the technological <strong>in</strong>teroperability possible but if we succumb to the same belief<br />
that hord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation, even from our coworkers, is more beneficial, then we will have ga<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
noth<strong>in</strong>g. After all, open<strong>in</strong>g up the gates—even those up <strong>in</strong> Redmond—does not guarantee that the<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation will flow. Even if security issues are successfully addressed so that <strong>in</strong>formation can flow<br />
<strong>in</strong> a controlled manner, bus<strong>in</strong>ess practices will not evolve without cultural changes to match our<br />
technological advancements.<br />
In the end, the effectiveness of the st<strong>and</strong>ards themselves directly depends on the effectiveness of the<br />
SSOs <strong>and</strong> the companies that develop <strong>and</strong> use the st<strong>and</strong>ards. If too much st<strong>and</strong>ardization occurs,<br />
much of it will not be used. It is important to remember that the goal is mass implementation of a<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard. Only through widespread implementation can we achieve <strong>in</strong>teroperability—the true value<br />
of st<strong>and</strong>ards. If the schedule of st<strong>and</strong>ards development <strong>and</strong> revisions doesn’t match the pace of<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>esses—strik<strong>in</strong>g a calculated balance between too slow <strong>and</strong> too fast—the revisions will not be<br />
adopted <strong>and</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>g organization will end up fragment<strong>in</strong>g its own st<strong>and</strong>ard. In sett<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards development <strong>and</strong> revision schedule, it is not only the vendors <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g the changes<br />
that we have to consider, it is the will<strong>in</strong>gness <strong>and</strong> speed of their customers to adopt those changes.<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g st<strong>and</strong>ards strategically is a new concept for an old practice. But the rules <strong>in</strong> that practice are<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g, just as our markets are. In the end, perhaps it is best to heed a warn<strong>in</strong>g by John Wayne (as<br />
passed on by Ray Alderman): “Life is hard. It’s even harder when you’re stupid.” In this era of<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g markets <strong>and</strong> tough economic times, why make life harder on yourself? St<strong>and</strong>ardize,<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ardize, st<strong>and</strong>ardize—strategically, that is.<br />
<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Legislation</strong>: St<strong>and</strong>ardization <strong>in</strong> Conflict<br />
—Page 24—