13.10.2014 Views

Comparative dental development and microstructure of ... - UCL

Comparative dental development and microstructure of ... - UCL

Comparative dental development and microstructure of ... - UCL

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

190 A. D. BEYNON ET AL.<br />

Figure 13. The combined totals <strong>of</strong> cuspal enamel formation times estimated from the histological part <strong>of</strong><br />

the study <strong>and</strong> lateral enamel formation times estimated from perikymata counts from replicas (see in<br />

Appendix 2). The inner vertical lines denote the cuspal enamel formation times. In this chart all<br />

perikymata counts for each tooth type (both upper <strong>and</strong> lower) have been combined <strong>and</strong> the error bars<br />

(1 S.D.) indicate the overall variation for lateral enamel formation only for each tooth type <strong>of</strong> P. heseloni.<br />

surface. The total number <strong>of</strong> perikymata<br />

on any tooth surface appears in the last but<br />

one column. In general the perikymata<br />

counts for P. nyanzae are slightly higher<br />

than those for similar tooth types in P.<br />

heseloni. The total perikymata counts for<br />

anterior teeth presented here give a clearer<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> the completed lateral enamel formation<br />

times in a large number <strong>of</strong> Proconsul<br />

teeth <strong>and</strong> so complement the striae counts<br />

made from the histological sections on the<br />

buccal aspect. Table 2 contains data for<br />

total striae counts on all aspects <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

tooth sections prepared in the histological<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the study. When data for upper <strong>and</strong><br />

lower teeth <strong>of</strong> the same tooth type are<br />

combined the likely true extent <strong>of</strong> the contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cuspal <strong>and</strong> lateral enamel<br />

formation times to total crown formation<br />

times <strong>of</strong> P. heseloni can be appreciated<br />

(Figure 13).<br />

Cuspal enamel formation times deduced<br />

from the histological sections were used to<br />

calculate crown formation times in three<br />

ways (i) by summing cuspal <strong>and</strong> lateral<br />

enamel formation times in the teeth where<br />

complete crowns are represented in the<br />

histological sections (Table 2) <strong>and</strong> (ii) by<br />

summing cuspal formation times with data<br />

for buccal or mesiobuccal perikymata<br />

counts. The average crown formation times,<br />

derived for this purpose from the perikymata<br />

data for each tooth type, appear in the last<br />

column <strong>of</strong> Appendix 2. A five day cross<br />

striation repeat interval between perikymata<br />

<strong>and</strong> striae <strong>of</strong> Retzius in lateral enamel has<br />

been assumed for all P. heseloni specimens<br />

<strong>and</strong> a six day interval for all the larger P.<br />

nyanzae, <strong>and</strong> P. major specimens represented<br />

in this study. (iii) In five <strong>of</strong> the<br />

juvenile <strong>and</strong> four <strong>of</strong> the adult specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

P. heseloni <strong>and</strong> in both molar teeth attributed<br />

to P. nyanzae, it was possible to estimate<br />

crown formation times using dentine. All<br />

these estimates for crown formation times<br />

appear in Table 4.<br />

Root extension rates <strong>and</strong> the timing <strong>of</strong> root<br />

formation<br />

In four sections, the dm 2 <strong>of</strong> the infant,<br />

the M 1 , the P 4 <strong>and</strong> the M 2 <strong>of</strong> the adult<br />

specimen, it was possible to make each <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!