13.10.2014 Views

Layout 2 - University of Central Lancashire

Layout 2 - University of Central Lancashire

Layout 2 - University of Central Lancashire

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The business <strong>of</strong> identity theft<br />

It’s not just individuals who suffer from identity theft. Research at UCLan<br />

shows that businesses need to take the threat more seriously.<br />

Identity theft it is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing crimes<br />

in the UK which, according to the Home Office<br />

Identity Fraud Steering Committee, costs the UK<br />

economy an estimated £1.7 billion per year.<br />

Anyone can be a victim <strong>of</strong> identity theft,<br />

described as the theft and use <strong>of</strong> personal<br />

identifying information <strong>of</strong> an actual person, as<br />

opposed to the use <strong>of</strong> a fictitious identity. People<br />

committing the crimes can be located anywhere<br />

across the globe.<br />

Dr Mahmood Shah, a Senior Lecturer in Business<br />

Systems at UCLan, is an expert in the field <strong>of</strong><br />

identity theft and fraud. He studied for his PhD in<br />

e-banking and security and he has advised many<br />

businesses, consumers and policy-makers about<br />

the impact <strong>of</strong> identity fraud and prevention<br />

strategies, not only on the individual or the<br />

business, but on the UK as a whole.<br />

Both identity theft and identity fraud can pose<br />

a real threat to the financial health <strong>of</strong> an<br />

organisation and its business reputation. Many<br />

entrepreneurs are so focused on the basics <strong>of</strong><br />

getting a business up and running - and making<br />

a pr<strong>of</strong>it - that they neglect to think through<br />

appropriate security measures.<br />

Unfortunately many smaller organisations fail to<br />

fully recover from this type <strong>of</strong> fraud and many<br />

have ceased trading altogether.<br />

Dr Shah and his research team carried out a<br />

major study to identify the extent <strong>of</strong> the problem<br />

and losses incurred, not only in the UK but<br />

worldwide. This was followed with a review into<br />

common methods and approaches that<br />

businesses use to address and reduce the impact<br />

<strong>of</strong> the problem. Much <strong>of</strong> the fraud in recent years<br />

has taken place within the online retail sector,<br />

with businesses and individuals becoming more<br />

reliant, and seemingly more confident with<br />

e-commerce and online communication.<br />

However, as technology becomes more<br />

sophisticated, so too do the fraudsters. Dr Shah<br />

has been investigating how seriously companies<br />

are taking consumer safety.<br />

“Many organisations bury their heads, or rather<br />

their policies, in the sand, perhaps feeling that if<br />

they inform customers too much about their<br />

procedures on identity fraud, consumers will lose<br />

confidence and stop doing business with them.<br />

This is a risk in the current climate that<br />

organisations are not willing to take.”<br />

However, Dr Shah argues, being open about this<br />

issue can actually help increase buyer confidence<br />

and educate the consumer in the part they need<br />

to play in protecting their identity.<br />

Working with one <strong>of</strong> the largest UK-based online<br />

retailers, Dr Shah’s research team has investigated<br />

the issue <strong>of</strong> consumer carelessness. “Consumers<br />

are so overloaded with having to remember too<br />

many different passwords and pin numbers that<br />

many don’t take their personal data seriously,” he<br />

added. “They use information close to them such<br />

as a spouse or child’s name, and with the<br />

increasing popularity <strong>of</strong> social media this<br />

information can be easily discovered. As we have<br />

seen, no one is immune to identity fraud.”<br />

By working with UCLan, online retailers and other<br />

companies who handle sensitive data can<br />

implement strategies and policies to inform the<br />

consumer <strong>of</strong> the issues. This is one way <strong>of</strong><br />

tackling the fraudsters. Dr Shah has also seen<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> organisations working together to<br />

look at best practice models across sectors.<br />

The research team has also studied the problem<br />

from an international dimension, as this gives UK<br />

businesses collateral to manage the situation and<br />

minimise losses as best they can.<br />

Dr Shah continued: “This issue is not going to go<br />

away, and in some cases it is getting worse<br />

through the issue <strong>of</strong> internal fraud and the selling<br />

<strong>of</strong> data; an area we are now researching.<br />

Businesses that handle sensitive data need to<br />

ensure recruitment and monitoring policies are in<br />

place to prevent and tackle this growing issue.”<br />

Research has shown that in countries such as<br />

France and Germany, businesses frequently use<br />

third-party interventions that are better equipped<br />

to handle secure information.<br />

Dr Shah understands that this may not be an<br />

option for some UK companies as it may deprive<br />

them <strong>of</strong> the data they use to sell additional<br />

products and services. “There is no ‘one size fits<br />

all’ when it comes to identity theft,” Dr Shah<br />

concluded: “Businesses need to take identify<br />

theft as seriously as they take other corporate<br />

social responsibility issues. The very existence <strong>of</strong><br />

e-communications is under threat if we don’t<br />

resolve this issue.”<br />

Pictured left: Dr Mahmood Shah, Senior Lecturer in Business Systems.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!