17.10.2014 Views

EA10 Approaches to Lowestoft - United Kingdom Hydrographic Office

EA10 Approaches to Lowestoft - United Kingdom Hydrographic Office

EA10 Approaches to Lowestoft - United Kingdom Hydrographic Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />

HYDROGRAPHIC OFFICE<br />

EAST ANGLIA<br />

APPROACHES TO LOWESTOFT<br />

ASSESSMENT ON THE ANALYSIS OF ROUTINE RESURVEY AREA <strong>EA10</strong><br />

FROM THE 2005 SURVEY<br />

FEBRUARY 2006


THE UNITED KINGDOM<br />

HYDROGRAPHIC OFFICE<br />

EAST ANGLIA<br />

APPROACHES TO LOWESTOFT<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005<br />

An assessment of the 2005 hydrographic survey of the area: <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r recent seabed<br />

movement; <strong>to</strong> identify any implications for shipping; and <strong>to</strong> make recommendations for<br />

future surveys.<br />

The Admiralty Chart extracts, other graphics and tables in this Report are included for illustrative purposes<br />

only and are NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION.<br />

This material is protected by Crown Copyright. It may be downloaded from the UK <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong>'s (UKHO) web site and printed in<br />

full for personal or non-commercial internal business use. Extracts may also be reproduced for personal or non-commercial internal<br />

business use on the condition that the UK <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong> is acknowledged as the publisher and the Crown is acknowledged as the<br />

copyright owner.<br />

Applications for permission <strong>to</strong> reproduce the material for any other purpose (including any distribution of the material or extracts <strong>to</strong> third<br />

parties) can be made interactively on the UKHO's web site (www.ukho.gov.uk), by e-mail <strong>to</strong> intellectualproperty@ukho.gov.uk or in<br />

writing <strong>to</strong> Intellectual Property, UK <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, Admiralty Way, Taun<strong>to</strong>n, Somerset, TA1 2DN.<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 1 of 20


CONTENTS<br />

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3<br />

2. INTRODUCTION 4<br />

3. HISTORY 4<br />

4. DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA 5<br />

5. SHIPPING IN THE AREA 5<br />

6. 2004 SURVEY DETAILS 6<br />

7. 2005 SURVEY DETAILS 7<br />

8. DESCRIPTION OF RECENT BATHYMETRIC CHANGE 7<br />

9. IMPLICATIONS FOR SHIPPING 8<br />

10. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE SURVEYS 8<br />

11. REFERENCES 9<br />

ANNEXES<br />

A. Area Specifications (Including Survey His<strong>to</strong>ry) 10<br />

B. Location Plot and Diagrammatic Representation of Ships' Tracks from COAST v6.1 11<br />

C. 2005 Survey Data Overlaid on Chart 1536 12<br />

D. Three Dimensional View Generated from the 2005 Survey Data 13<br />

E. Sun Illuminated View of the 2005 Survey and Location of Cross Sections Shown 14<br />

At Annex F<br />

F. Cross Sections from the 2005 Survey 15<br />

G. Colour Banded Depth Plot from the 2004 Survey showing Selected Depths 16<br />

H. Colour Banded Depth Plot from the 2005 Survey showing Selected Depths 17<br />

I. Variability Plot showing Bathymetric Changes between the 2004 and 2005 18<br />

Survey Data and Charted Con<strong>to</strong>urs from the 2005 Survey<br />

J. Composite Diagram of the 5 metre Con<strong>to</strong>ur from the 2004 and 2005 Surveys 19<br />

K. Composite Diagram of the 10 metre Con<strong>to</strong>ur from the 2004 and 2005 Surveys 20<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 2 of 20


APPROACHES TO LOWESTOFT, 2005<br />

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

The Area and Recent Changes<br />

1.1 A focused area within <strong>EA10</strong> is surveyed on an annual cycle and includes Stanford Channel,<br />

which provides the main approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Harbour from the south. The full area,<br />

which includes the adjacent banks, is surveyed on a 3 year cycle. The 2005 survey was<br />

the second routine resurvey of the area using a multibeam echosounder.<br />

1.2 Depths in the final approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft, including the area of The Ridge, and across the<br />

seaward entrance <strong>to</strong> Stanford Channel, where there is an area of sandwaves, are<br />

potentially limiting <strong>to</strong> shipping. Vessels with draughts of up <strong>to</strong> 7 metres are unders<strong>to</strong>od <strong>to</strong><br />

use Stanford Channel, with vessels up <strong>to</strong> 6 metres commonly berthing in Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Inner<br />

Harbour.<br />

1.3 The minimum depth in the entrance <strong>to</strong> Stanford Channel has increased from 6.0 metres <strong>to</strong><br />

6.3 metres when compared against the 2004 survey and sandwaves have migrated<br />

southwards by approximately 75 metres.<br />

1.4 A sandwave previously lying close north of Southwest Holm buoy has a similar minimum<br />

depth, but now lies immediately southeast of the buoy.<br />

1.5 The 5 metre con<strong>to</strong>ur delimiting Holm Sand has extended southwards slightly, but remains<br />

outside the buoyed channel.<br />

1.6 Depths throughout the rest of the area remain broadly similar. A shoal depth of 1.9<br />

metres exists on the edge of the survey area, <strong>to</strong> the southeast of the entrance <strong>to</strong><br />

Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Harbour. This reflects a shoaling <strong>to</strong> a ridge which extends in<strong>to</strong> the area, a<br />

charted depth of 1.3 metres exists over this ridge outside the focused survey area.<br />

Reasons for Continuing <strong>to</strong> Resurvey the Area<br />

1.7 Stanford Channel provides a buoyed approach <strong>to</strong> the port of Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft. The following<br />

areas require frequent resurveying due <strong>to</strong> changes occurring -<br />

• the shoal ridge and sandwaves at the entrance <strong>to</strong> Stanford Channel are of most<br />

concern and required annual surveying;<br />

• the remainder of the approach appears more stable and contains fewer mobile<br />

features, as such the requirement for annual surveying needs further<br />

consideration;<br />

• the adjacent banks of Newcome Sand and Holm Sand are mobile, but outside the<br />

buoyed channel and require less frequent surveying.<br />

Recommendations<br />

1.8 Much of Stanford Channel is generally stable and, away from the area of sandwaves at the<br />

entrance <strong>to</strong> the channel, there is potential for reducing the requirement for annual<br />

resurveying. Although 2 multibeam surveys of the focused area are available and have<br />

been examined in this report, with previous reports also consulted, it is considered that a<br />

more extensive examination of his<strong>to</strong>rical data is undertaken when the 2006 survey,<br />

covering the full area, is assessed. Inclusion of a third multibeam data set will also<br />

provide a better indication of trends occurring in the area.<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 3 of 20


1.9 The limits and frequency should remain unchanged at present.<br />

2.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

2.1 This Assessment is produced by the <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong> (UKHO) for the<br />

Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA).<br />

2.2 Analysis of the Routine Resurvey Areas forms part of the Civil Hydrography Programme<br />

and the reports are distributed <strong>to</strong> members of the Committee On Shipping Hydrography<br />

(COSH). When approved by the annual COSH meeting and endorsed by the Civil<br />

<strong>Hydrographic</strong> Review Committee (CHRC), the recommendations are incorporated in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

Routine Resurvey Programme. The report is governed by a Memorandum of<br />

Understanding between the DfT (including the MCA) and the MOD (including the UKHO).<br />

3.<br />

HISTORY<br />

3.1 <strong>EA10</strong> is one of the routine resurvey areas of the East Anglian Routine Resurvey<br />

Programme, which covers the approaches <strong>to</strong> the East Anglian ports of Great Yarmouth and<br />

Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft.<br />

3.2 Prior <strong>to</strong> 1980 the area that includes <strong>EA10</strong> was designated as areas A and B. These<br />

covered an area extending from Holm Sand in the north via Pakefield Road <strong>to</strong> Barnard in<br />

the south.<br />

3.3 In 1980 areas A and B were reorganised with changed limits and given the identifiers C1<br />

and C3. These had an annual and 3 year survey interval respectively.<br />

3.4 The 1994 report on C1 and C3 radically altered the limits, removing C3 from the<br />

programme, although parts of C3 were subsumed within other areas. In 1997 C1 was<br />

given the identifier <strong>EA10</strong>, with unchanged limits and survey interval.<br />

3.5 Following assessment of the 2001 survey, the area limits were revised <strong>to</strong> better focus on<br />

areas of concern <strong>to</strong> shipping. The southwest part of the area was transferred <strong>to</strong> EA12, and<br />

the southern limit was extended <strong>to</strong> take account of sediment transport along Newcome<br />

Sand.<br />

3.6 At a Working Group meeting convened after the 2002 Committee on Shipping<br />

Hydrography (COSH) meeting, it was agreed that for the 2003 survey <strong>EA10</strong> would be fully<br />

surveyed <strong>to</strong> IHO Order 1 Standard between the 5 metre and 15 metre con<strong>to</strong>urs. Over the<br />

banks, survey lines were <strong>to</strong> be opened up <strong>to</strong> 150 metre line spacing and sounding-only<br />

lines run <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r the stability/movement of these banks.<br />

3.7 Subsequent <strong>to</strong> conducting the 2004 survey, new limits and survey regime for <strong>EA10</strong> were<br />

proposed. This consisted of a survey of the full area on a 3-year cycle, but with reduced<br />

limits, and a focused survey, restricting surveying <strong>to</strong> the channels on the intervening<br />

years. The 2004 survey was conducted as a focused survey of the main channel, covering<br />

the approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft.<br />

3.8 This is the tenth Assessment on the area. A Report covering multiple surveys was<br />

published in 1994.<br />

3.9 Trinity House Lighthouse Service (THLS) also conducts surveys of Stanford Channel.<br />

These are unders<strong>to</strong>od <strong>to</strong> generally conducted at about 6 monthly intervals; the frequency<br />

of these surveys has been extended, initially from quarterly <strong>to</strong> every 4 months (1997) and<br />

then <strong>to</strong> every 6 months (1998). However, the latest surveys held by the UKHO were<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 4 of 20


conducted in May 2003 (whole of Stanford Channel surveyed) and December 2004<br />

(entrance <strong>to</strong> Stanford Channel).<br />

4. DESCRIPTION OF THE AREA<br />

4.1 <strong>EA10</strong> covers Stanford Channel and final approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft, and the focused area<br />

surveyed in 2005 covered 1.69 SQ NM (5.8 SQ KM).<br />

4.2 Stanford Channel, which is buoyed, effectively bisects <strong>EA10</strong> and separates the shoal areas<br />

of Holm Sand and Newcome Sand. Stanford Channel provides the main approach route <strong>to</strong><br />

Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Harbour from the south. The channel was buoyed and opened up <strong>to</strong> shipping in<br />

1994, at which time the controlling depth across the entrance was 4.6 metres. At the<br />

same time, buoys marking Pakefield Road and Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft South Road were discontinued.<br />

Depths of 6.3 metres and greater were found across the entrance <strong>to</strong> the channel in the<br />

2005 survey.<br />

4.3 The potentially limiting depths in the area are those on the final approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft,<br />

including those over The Ridge, lying <strong>to</strong> the northeast of Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Harbour entrance and<br />

those across the seaward entrance <strong>to</strong> Stanford Channel. A channel dredged <strong>to</strong> 4.7 metres<br />

lies inside the harbour entrance.<br />

4.4 The seabed sediments comprise of mud, fine sand, sand, pebbles and broken shell.<br />

Southward migrating sandwaves lie within the flood dominant Stanford Channel,<br />

predominantly at the entrance <strong>to</strong> the channel and along the western side of Holm Sand.<br />

The final approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Harbour is made up of extensive small sand ripples, with<br />

ripples of up <strong>to</strong> 0.3 metres on the southern side of the channel. A small area of<br />

sandwaves up <strong>to</strong> 1.5 metres in height lies at the entrance <strong>to</strong> the channel.<br />

4.5 Area specifications, including the survey his<strong>to</strong>ry, are at Annex A and limits are shown at<br />

Annex B.<br />

5. SHIPPING IN THE AREA<br />

5.1 During recent surveys a moderate flow of commercial shipping has been observed <strong>to</strong><br />

transit <strong>EA10</strong>. These were North Sea oil and gas installation support vessels and medium<br />

sized coasters. Additionally a small number of fishing vessels operate within <strong>EA10</strong> and<br />

recreational sailing vessels are seen, particularly at the weekend.<br />

5.2 Vessels up <strong>to</strong> 6 metres draught can normally berth in Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Inner Harbour, although<br />

vessels up <strong>to</strong> 6.5 metres are accommodated subject <strong>to</strong> available tide and suitable weather<br />

conditions. Vessels with draughts of up <strong>to</strong> about 7 metres are unders<strong>to</strong>od <strong>to</strong> anchor<br />

outside the harbour, usually <strong>to</strong> shelter from inclement weather.<br />

5.3 The main approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft Harbour is through Stanford Channel. Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft South<br />

Road and Pakefield Road <strong>to</strong> the west of the area provide inshore access from the south for<br />

fishing vessels and are used by the occasional small coaster of less than 1,000 <strong>to</strong>nnes and<br />

drawing no more than 2 metres en route through the area. Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft North Road is very<br />

rarely used as a passage for shipping, with only a small number of standby vessels, with<br />

drafts below 3 metres, regularly using Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft North Road and Cor<strong>to</strong>n Road further<br />

north.<br />

5.4 A search of the COAST database v6.1, based on a 1.7 nautical mile radius centred on<br />

52° 27’.4N 1° 46’.5E (see Annex B), shows an estimate of 678 vessels per annum<br />

transiting the search area. The statistics use a common destination point off Great<br />

Yarmouth for the ports of Great Yarmouth and Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft. As such, the data is of little use<br />

in determining actual shipping patterns within the area.<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 5 of 20


Type DWT Total<br />

< 1,500 112<br />

Merchant 1,500 – 5,000 422<br />

>5,000 24<br />

Tankers<br />

< 5,000 92<br />

> 5,000 0<br />

< 1,500 20<br />

RORO >1,500 0<br />

Container<br />

< 1,500 0<br />

1,500 - 5,000 8<br />

Total: 678<br />

5.5 The following figures provided by the Port of Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft detail arrivals at the port in 2003<br />

and 2004.<br />

Vessel Type 2003 2004<br />

Container 52 12<br />

Tankers 7 3<br />

Cargo 130 115<br />

Standby 182 148<br />

Research/Barges 341 388<br />

Tugs 176 180<br />

Deep Sea Fishing 89 47<br />

Inshore Fishing 2,012 1,810<br />

Total: 2,989 2,703<br />

6. 2004 SURVEY DETAILS<br />

6.1 The survey was conducted from 25 May <strong>to</strong> 09 June. Weather in the area remained good<br />

while on survey task with the exception of three days where the weather picked up forcing<br />

the vessel <strong>to</strong> return alongside Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft.<br />

6.2 This survey was conducted using a dual head Kongsberg Maritime EM3000D multibeam<br />

echosounder. The system forms 127 beams from each sonar head, giving a <strong>to</strong>tal of 254<br />

beams, but with an overlap in swaths in the nadir region. Survey lines were run at 50<br />

metre intervals, with object detection criteria met with the multibeam echosounder. Cross<br />

lines were run in accordance with survey instructions. The survey achieved IHO S44<br />

Order 1 standard.<br />

6.3 Positioning was by DGPS and the survey referred <strong>to</strong> the International Terrestrial Reference<br />

Framework 2000 (ITRF2000) Datum. The survey achieved a horizontal accuracy of ±1.7<br />

metres (2σ).<br />

6.4 The data was processed using Kongsberg Neptune v4.1 and shoalest depths from 2 metre<br />

cells were extracted, retaining the observed depths in their true positions.<br />

6.5 The accuracy of depth measurements at nadir was assessed as 0.17 metres with the error<br />

increasing <strong>to</strong> 0.5 metres at the outer beams. Details are as follows:<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 6 of 20


Depth in metres<br />

5 10 15<br />

Combined Total Error at Nadir (2σ) 0.17 0.17 0.17<br />

Requirement (2σ) 0.50 0.52 0.54<br />

7. 2005 SURVEY DETAILS<br />

7.1 The survey was conducted from 24 <strong>to</strong> 26 May. Weather in the area remained good during<br />

the period. Shoal areas were surveyed during periods of high tide and slight seas so that<br />

lift was kept <strong>to</strong> a minimum.<br />

7.2 This survey was conducted using a dual head Kongsberg Maritime EM3000D multibeam<br />

echosounder. The survey achieved IHO S44 Order 1 standard.<br />

7.3 Positioning was by DGPS and the survey referred <strong>to</strong> the International Terrestrial Reference<br />

Framework 2000 (ITRF2000) Datum. The survey achieved a horizontal accuracy of ±0.9<br />

metres (2σ).<br />

7.4 The data was processed using Caris HIPS v5.4 and shoalest depths from 2 metre cells<br />

were extracted, retaining the observed depths in their true positions.<br />

7.5 The assessed accuracy of depth measurements at nadir met the required standard.<br />

Details are as follows:<br />

Depth in metres<br />

5 10 15<br />

Combined Total Error at Nadir (2σ) 0.13 0.14 0.15<br />

Requirement (2σ) 0.50 0.52 0.54<br />

7.6 The survey data draped over chart 1536 is shown at Annex C and a three-dimensional<br />

view is also shown at Annex D, showing the main features of <strong>EA10</strong>. A sun illuminated<br />

view of the 2005 survey, showing the location of cross sections is at Annex E and the<br />

cross sections are shown at Annex F.<br />

8. DESCRIPTION OF RECENT BATHYMETRIC CHANGE<br />

8.1 Colour banded depth plots of the 2004 and 2005 surveys are at Annexes G and H. A<br />

variability plot showing depth differences between the 2004 and 2005 surveys is at Annex<br />

I.<br />

8.2 Comparison plots of the 5 and 10 metre con<strong>to</strong>urs are at Annexes J and K respectively.<br />

8.3 The minimum depth within the buoyed entrance <strong>to</strong> Stanford Channel has increased from<br />

6.0 metres in 2004 <strong>to</strong> 6.3 metres in 2005. This follows a reduction in depth from 6.6<br />

metres <strong>to</strong> 6.0 metres between the 2003 and 2004 surveys. This depth lies on one of the<br />

sandwaves which lie across the entrance <strong>to</strong> the channel. These sandwaves are migrating<br />

southwards through the flood dominant channel. This will result in changes <strong>to</strong> both the<br />

height and position of the shallowest depth as the sandwaves move across the ridge at<br />

the channel entrance. Between the 2004 and 2005 surveys these sandwaves have<br />

migrated south by approximately 75 metres.<br />

8.4 The sandwave previously lying close north of Southwest Holm buoy has a similar<br />

minimum depth <strong>to</strong> that surveyed in 2004 (increasing from 5.7 metres <strong>to</strong> 5.8 metres), but<br />

now lies immediately southeast of the charted position of the buoy.<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 7 of 20


8.5 The 5 metre con<strong>to</strong>ur delimiting Holm Sand has extended southwards slightly, but remains<br />

outside the buoyed channel.<br />

8.6 Depths throughout the rest of the area remain broadly similar. Depths over the shoal<br />

patch <strong>to</strong> the east of North Newcome buoy are shoaler by around 0.1 metres, but the<br />

differences are well within survey <strong>to</strong>lerances. Six hundred metres the southwest of this<br />

shoal area there is a new shoal depth of 1.9 metres. This reflects a shoaling <strong>to</strong> a ridge<br />

which extends in<strong>to</strong> the area, a charted depth of 1.3 metres exists over this ridge outside<br />

the focused survey area.<br />

8.7 A provisional Notice <strong>to</strong> Marines was issued (3757(P)/05) advising of changes <strong>to</strong> depths on<br />

Chart 1536.<br />

9.<br />

IMPLICATIONS FOR SHIPPING<br />

9.1 Changes that have occurred within the area are not of immediate concern <strong>to</strong> shipping<br />

using the buoyed channel and approach <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft.<br />

9.2 Ongoing migration of sandwaves and changes in their minimum depths at the entrance <strong>to</strong><br />

Stanford Channel are of potential concern <strong>to</strong> shipping, in particular the sandwave close <strong>to</strong><br />

South Holm buoy.<br />

9.3 Much of the northern area is devoid of mobile bedforms and the need <strong>to</strong> resurvey the area<br />

annually requires careful consideration.<br />

10.<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE SURVEYS<br />

10.1 Much of Stanford Channel is generally stable and, away from the area of sandwaves at the<br />

entrance <strong>to</strong> the channel, there is potential for reducing the requirement for annual<br />

resurveying with 100% multibeam cover. Although 2 multibeam surveys have been<br />

examined in this report and previous reports consulted, it is considered that a more<br />

extensive examination of his<strong>to</strong>rical data is undertaken when the 2006 survey of the full<br />

area is assessed. Inclusion of a third multibeam data set will also provide a better<br />

indication of trends occurring in the area.<br />

10.2 The survey limits and frequency should remain unchanged at present.<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 8 of 20


11. REFERENCES<br />

11.1 Safetec Nordic AS, 2005: COAST Database v6.1.<br />

11.2 HR Wallingford, 2002: Southern North Sea Sediment Transport Study, Phase 2.<br />

11.3 <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, 2004: Report of Survey, <strong>Approaches</strong> <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft<br />

(M4158).<br />

11.4 <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, 2005: Report of Survey, <strong>Approaches</strong> <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft<br />

(M4268).<br />

11.5 <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, 2005: <strong>Approaches</strong> <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft, Assessment of<br />

Routine Resurvey Area <strong>EA10</strong> from the 2004 Survey.<br />

11.6 <strong>United</strong> <strong>Kingdom</strong> <strong>Hydrographic</strong> <strong>Office</strong>, 2003: NP54 North Sea (West) Pilot, Sixth Edition.<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 9 of 20


ANNEX A<br />

AREA SPECIFICATIONS<br />

(Including Survey His<strong>to</strong>ry)<br />

REGION: East Anglia NAME: <strong>Approaches</strong> <strong>to</strong> Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft AREA: <strong>EA10</strong><br />

LIMITS:<br />

Area co-ordinates are<br />

referred <strong>to</strong> WGS84 Datum<br />

1yr interval<br />

A 52°29’.00N 1°45’.72E<br />

B 52°29’.00N 1°47’.10E<br />

C 52°28’.00N 1°47’.10E<br />

D 52°26’.78N 1°47’.50E<br />

E 52°26’.10N 1°47’.10E<br />

F 52°26’.10N 1°46’.80E<br />

G 52°28.15N 1°46’.30E<br />

H 52°28.15N 1°45’.10E<br />

<strong>to</strong> (A) via the 2m con<strong>to</strong>ur<br />

3yr interval<br />

A 52°29’.00N 1°45’.72E<br />

B 52°29’.00N 1°48’.80E<br />

C 52°26’.60N 1°47’.60E<br />

D 52°26’.60N 1°46’.40E<br />

E 52°28’.00N 1°45’.80E<br />

F 52°28’.00N 1°45’.00E<br />

<strong>to</strong> (A) via the 2m con<strong>to</strong>ur<br />

AREA SIZE:<br />

1.69 SQ NM (5.8 SQ KM) Approx. – 1yr survey interval<br />

3.64 SQ NM (12.51 SQ KM) Approx. – 3yr survey interval<br />

SURVEY INTERVAL: 1/3 yr<br />

SURVEYS: (conducted at 1:25,000 scale (not applicable <strong>to</strong> multibeam surveys))<br />

Year Survey File Ref Data Year Survey File Ref Data<br />

1994 M2261 HH090/624/01 s.d. 2000 M3349 HH090/884/01 s.d.<br />

1995 M2481 HH090/663/01 s.d. 2001 M3542 HH090/941/01 s.d.<br />

1996 M2613 HH090/688/01 s.d. 2002 M3722 HH090/999/01 s.d.<br />

1997 M2814 HH090/735/01 s.d. 2003 M3913 HH090/021/01 s.t.d.<br />

1998 M3007 HH090/767/01 s.d. 2004 M4158 HH091/076/01 m.<br />

1999 M3212 HH090/849/01 s.d. 2005 M4268 HH091/112/01 m.<br />

KEY: s = sonar sweep, t = seabed texture tracing, d = digital data, m = multibeam digital data<br />

REPORTS: 1994 Latest survey included M2261 (HA145/02/03/04)<br />

ASSESSMENTS: 1995 M2481 (HA145/02/003/05) 2001 M3542 (HA145/010/065/01)<br />

1996 M2613 (HA145/010/004/01) 2003 M3722 (HA145/010/077/01)<br />

1997 M2814 (HA145/010/004/01) 2004 M3913 (HA145/010/089/01)<br />

1998 M3007 (HA145/010/004/01) 2005 M4158<br />

1999 M3212 (HA145/010/033/01) 2005 M4268<br />

2000 M3349 (HA145/010/033/01)<br />

REMARKS:<br />

1979 Report on old areas A and B (H1964/77)<br />

1980 Area C1 established (H3912/80)<br />

1993 Change of limits <strong>to</strong> include Newcome Sand up <strong>to</strong> the 10m line. Inshore of the 2m con<strong>to</strong>ur<br />

only <strong>to</strong> be surveyed every 3/6 years. Dept of Transport accepted recommendations on 15<br />

Oct 93 (HA145/02/03/04)<br />

1994 Report amends limits. Dept of Transport accepted recommendations Jul 95<br />

(HA145/02/03/04).<br />

1997 Limits amended. Identifier changed <strong>to</strong> <strong>EA10</strong><br />

2004 Introduction of focused annual surveys<br />

LARGEST SCALE CHART: 1536 (1:20,000 & 1:40,000)<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 10 of 20


ANNEX B<br />

LOCATION PLOT<br />

AND<br />

DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION<br />

OF SHIPS’ TRACKS FROM COAST V6.1<br />

Search Radius 1.7 NM: Centre 52º 27’.4N 1º 46’.5E<br />

EA9<br />

EA8<br />

Lowes<strong>to</strong>ft/Gt Yarm-Willebroek<br />

<strong>EA10</strong><br />

EA12<br />

Key<br />

_____ Limits of Focused Area <strong>EA10</strong> (2005 survey)<br />

_____<br />

Adjacent Routine Resurvey Areas<br />

_____ Search Area<br />

_____<br />

Ships’ Tracks<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 11 of 20


2005 SURVEY DATA OVERLAID ON CHART 1536<br />

ANNEX C<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 12 of 20


ANNEX D<br />

THREE DIMENSIONAL VIEW GENERATED<br />

FROM THE<br />

2005 SURVEY DATA<br />

Viewed from the South<br />

Vertical Exaggeration x12<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 13 of 20


ANNEX E<br />

SUN ILLUMINATED VIEW OF THE 2005 SURVEY<br />

AND<br />

LOCATON OF CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN AT ANNEX F<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Direction of sandwave<br />

Sediment migration transport based on sandwave based<br />

on asymmetry sandwave asymmetry<br />

F<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 14 of 20


ANNEX F<br />

CROSS SECTIONS FROM THE 2005 SURVEY<br />

(see Annex E for locations)<br />

A Profile AB B<br />

C Profile CD D<br />

E Profile EF F<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 15 of 20


ANNEX G<br />

COLOUR BANDED DEPTH PLOT<br />

FROM THE 2004 SURVEY<br />

SHOWING SELECTED DEPTHS<br />

SCALE 1:40,000<br />

Depths in Metres<br />

0.0 <strong>to</strong> 3.0<br />

3.1 <strong>to</strong> 5.0<br />

5.1 <strong>to</strong> 7.0<br />

7.1 <strong>to</strong> 9.0<br />

9.1 <strong>to</strong> 11.0 Selected shoal depths<br />

11.1 <strong>to</strong> 16.0<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 16 of 20


ANNEX H<br />

COLOUR BANDED DEPTH PLOT<br />

FROM THE 2005 SURVEY<br />

SHOWING SELECTED DEPTHS<br />

SCALE 1:40,000<br />

Depths in Metres<br />

0.0 <strong>to</strong> 3.0<br />

3.1 <strong>to</strong> 5.0<br />

5.1 <strong>to</strong> 7.0<br />

7.1 <strong>to</strong> 9.0<br />

9.1 <strong>to</strong> 11.0 Selected shoal depths<br />

11.1 <strong>to</strong> 16.0<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 17 of 20


ANNEX I<br />

VARIABILITY PLOT SHOWING<br />

BATHYMETRIC CHANGES BETWEEN THE 2004 AND 2005 SURVEY DATA<br />

AND CHARTED CONTOURS FROM THE 2005 SURVEY<br />

SCALE 1:40,000<br />

Values in Metres<br />

Shoaling<br />

Deepening<br />

4.0 <strong>to</strong> 3.0<br />

3.0 <strong>to</strong> 2.0<br />

2.0 <strong>to</strong> 0.0<br />

0.0 <strong>to</strong> 1.0<br />

1.0 <strong>to</strong> 2.0<br />

2.0 <strong>to</strong> 3.0<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 18 of 20


ANNEX J<br />

COMPOSITE DIAGRAM OF THE<br />

5 METRE CONTOUR FROM THE 2004 AND 2005 SURVEYS<br />

SCALE 1:40,000<br />

Year of Survey<br />

_____ 2005<br />

_____ 2004<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 19 of 20


ANNEX K<br />

COMPOSITE DIAGRAM OF THE<br />

10 METRE CONTOUR FROM THE 2004 AND 2005 SURVEYS<br />

SCALE 1:40,000<br />

Year of Survey<br />

_____ 2005<br />

_____ 2004<br />

Assessment <strong>EA10</strong>/2005 – Original Page 20 of 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!