19.10.2014 Views

MEASURING WATER USE IN A GREEN ECONOMY - UNEP

MEASURING WATER USE IN A GREEN ECONOMY - UNEP

MEASURING WATER USE IN A GREEN ECONOMY - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Measuring water use in a green economy<br />

Figure 3.1, however a static model is shown,<br />

not including the time-space variability of the<br />

water cycle impacted by climate change. In a<br />

further development of Figure 3.1, blue water<br />

resources are referred to as the sum of surface<br />

and groundwater; green water resources are<br />

referred to as rainwater insofar as it does not<br />

become run-off.<br />

The large differences in residence times make<br />

it necessary to address the stocks and flows<br />

from the perspective of their potential use.<br />

Residence time is an intriguing indicator. It<br />

expresses the claim that a storage project<br />

makes into the future, as a kind of temporal<br />

footprint. It also expresses, in a temporal<br />

unit, its spatial dependency and area of<br />

influence. ‘The larger the residence time<br />

of a reservoir, the greater its dependence<br />

on the water resources generated in the<br />

upstream catchment area, and the larger the<br />

impacted area downstream [cf. Vörösmarty<br />

et al., 1997].’ Van der Zaag and Gupta, 2008).<br />

Large reservoirs and their operations for<br />

agriculture and hydropower can cause large<br />

changes in flow regime which can be a major<br />

cause of ecosystem degradation. There is no<br />

simple method to depict the complexity of the<br />

situation. The role of all quantification methods<br />

included here is to present the balances at<br />

levels of temporal and spatial disaggregation<br />

that are practically useful (both in themselves<br />

and in supporting other methodologies). They<br />

should be as free as possible from misleading<br />

errors resulting from misunderstanding of the<br />

flux and stock issues, and they should specify<br />

the location of water consumption and the<br />

(potentially distant) location of impact or water<br />

stress.<br />

This report uses terminology derived from<br />

the International Recommendations for<br />

Figure 3.1<br />

Figure 3.1<br />

Simplified water budget at a river basin scale<br />

Simplified water budget at the river basin scale<br />

Actual<br />

Evapotranspiration<br />

(ET a)<br />

Precipitation<br />

Actual<br />

External Inflow<br />

(Qi) (SW+GW)<br />

Imports / Exports /<br />

Returned Flow<br />

SW Inflow<br />

Agriculture<br />

Streamflow<br />

Total Actual Outflow (SW+GW)<br />

(Qo = Qo,s + Qo,n)<br />

Qo,n<br />

into neighbouring<br />

Public water<br />

supply<br />

Reservoir<br />

Storage<br />

Industry<br />

Qo,s into the sea<br />

GW Inflow<br />

SW Outflow<br />

River Basin - RB<br />

Other<br />

Water Abstractions<br />

GW Storage<br />

GW level<br />

Major Aquifer System - MAS<br />

GW Outflow<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!