22.10.2014 Views

The Development of New Industrial Relations in Slovenia - UMAR

The Development of New Industrial Relations in Slovenia - UMAR

The Development of New Industrial Relations in Slovenia - UMAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1994 (Stanojevič, Omerzu, 1994) it was estimated, that around 60% <strong>of</strong> all workers<br />

(the rate <strong>of</strong> union density) were members <strong>of</strong> trade unions. <strong>The</strong> survey shoved, that<br />

59,6% <strong>of</strong> the total active population were members <strong>of</strong> trade unions (and 4,6% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

non - active population), and 63,5% <strong>of</strong> all employed persons (23,3% <strong>of</strong> unemployed).<br />

Among “white collar” workers 54,9% were trade union members and among “blue<br />

collar” workers 75,9%. As said already,, membership <strong>in</strong> trade unions fell from<br />

practically 100% before 1990 to 63.5% <strong>in</strong> 1994 and (accord<strong>in</strong>g to a new telephone<br />

surwey) to about 42% <strong>in</strong> 1999. It now ranges close to the European average, which<br />

is around 40% (OECD, 1991).<br />

COMPARISON 1 OF TRADE UNION DENSITY AND COLLECTIVE BARGAINING COVERAGE IN<br />

1990 - 1994<br />

Trade union density 2 Collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g coverage 3<br />

1990 1994 1990 1994<br />

Sweden 83 91 86 89<br />

F<strong>in</strong>land 72 81 95 95<br />

Denmark 71 76 69 69<br />

Norway 56 58 75 74<br />

Belgium 51 54 90 90<br />

Austria 46 42 98 98<br />

Italy 39 39 83 82<br />

Canada 36 38 38 36<br />

Australia 41 35 80 80<br />

England 39 34 47 47<br />

Portugal 32 32 79 71<br />

<strong>New</strong> Zealand 45 30 67 31<br />

Germany 33 29 90 92<br />

Switzerland 27 27 53 50<br />

<strong>The</strong> Netherlands 26 26 71 81<br />

Japan 25 24 23 21<br />

Spa<strong>in</strong> 13 19 76 78<br />

U.S.A. 16 16 18 18<br />

France 10 9 92 95<br />

SLOVENIA 100 64 100 100<br />

Sources <strong>of</strong> data: OECD: Employment Outlook. July, 1997; Stanojevič M., Omerzu M.:<br />

Javnomnenjske podobe s<strong>in</strong>dikatov. Ljubljana, 1994. Notes: 1 countries are ranked accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

trade union density <strong>in</strong> 1994, 2 trade union density: percentage <strong>of</strong> trade union members <strong>in</strong> all<br />

employees, 3 collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g coverage: percentage <strong>of</strong> workers <strong>in</strong> total employees whose<br />

employment conditions are def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> collective agreements.<br />

Collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g coverage (CBC) is the share <strong>of</strong> workers whose employment<br />

conditions are def<strong>in</strong>ed by collective agreements <strong>in</strong> all employees (OECD, 1997). <strong>The</strong><br />

coverage rate depends on the share <strong>of</strong> workers belong<strong>in</strong>g to trade unions, the share<br />

<strong>of</strong> employers belong<strong>in</strong>g to employers’ organisations and the authorities’ use <strong>of</strong><br />

statutory mechanisms <strong>in</strong> extend<strong>in</strong>g collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g agreements. In most<br />

countries, collective barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g coverage is higher than membership <strong>in</strong> trade unions.<br />

France is the extreme case, comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the lowest unionisation rate and one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

highest coverage rates. <strong>The</strong> reasons are: employers may extend collective<br />

agreements to non-union workers, or authorities may extend the validity <strong>of</strong> collective<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!