23.10.2014 Views

S ongquan D eng / Shutterstock .com - University of Nevada School ...

S ongquan D eng / Shutterstock .com - University of Nevada School ...

S ongquan D eng / Shutterstock .com - University of Nevada School ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Health Risks & Behaviors<br />

Gambling & Other Process Addictions<br />

Process addictions such as pathological gambling,<br />

Internet addiction, food addiction, etc., show<br />

neurobiological, stimulus-reward patterns similar<br />

to substance addictions. In addition, process<br />

addictions show similarities in the progression<br />

from social use to abuse and dependency. And<br />

just like substance dependence, process addictions<br />

may result in <strong>com</strong>pulsive behaviors and craving,<br />

continuing the behavior in spite <strong>of</strong> adverse<br />

consequences, and loss <strong>of</strong> control over the behavior.<br />

Scientists now acknowledge the similarities<br />

between substance dependence and pathological<br />

gambling.<br />

The National Council on Problem Gambling<br />

(NCPG, 2012) estimated that 85% <strong>of</strong> all U.S.<br />

adults have gambled at least once in their lives<br />

and 60% have gambled in the past year. Of these,<br />

approximately 1%, or 2 million adults, met the<br />

diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling, and<br />

2-3%, or 4-6 million, were problem gamblers<br />

(NCPG, 2012). In a nationally representative study<br />

<strong>of</strong> U.S. households between 2001 and 2003, 78.4%<br />

<strong>of</strong> participants reported gambling at least once in<br />

their lifetime; the prevalence estimate for lifetime<br />

problem gambling was 2.3%; and the estimate<br />

for lifetime pathological gambling was 0.6%<br />

(Kessler et al, 2008). Age <strong>of</strong> onset for those who<br />

eventually became problem gamblers (median age<br />

= 21) was later than for non-problem gamblers<br />

(median age = 18; p. 1354). Rank-order popularity<br />

<strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong> gambling did not differ across<br />

pathological and non-problem gamblers. However,<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> pathological gamblers who chose<br />

specific types <strong>of</strong> gambling was higher than for all<br />

gamblers (see Figure HR12).<br />

Fig. HR12: Popularity <strong>of</strong> Gaming by<br />

Gambler Type<br />

Speculating on High Risk Investments<br />

Internet Gambling<br />

Sports Betting: Bookie/Parlay Card<br />

Office Sports Pools<br />

Gambling at a Casino<br />

Slot Machines or Bingo<br />

Numbers/Lotto<br />

All Gamblers<br />

8.4%<br />

26.9%<br />

1.0%<br />

7.5%<br />

5.8%<br />

45.3%<br />

44.3%<br />

85.1%<br />

44.7%<br />

78.5%<br />

48.9%<br />

77.3%<br />

62.2%<br />

86.5%<br />

Pathological Gamblers<br />

In addition, the odds <strong>of</strong> developing a pathological<br />

gambling disorder increased by type <strong>of</strong> gaming.<br />

Games requiring mental skill (card games such<br />

as poker, bridge, etc.) posed the highest risk <strong>of</strong><br />

association with pathological gambling. Further,<br />

Kessler et al.’s (2008) study supported previous<br />

research showing <strong>com</strong>orbidity between pathological<br />

gambling and bipolar disorder, substance use<br />

disorders, and panic disorder. These mental health<br />

disorders preceded the onset <strong>of</strong> pathological<br />

gambling.<br />

Gambling studies <strong>of</strong> adults 50 and older also<br />

indicated an increase in prevalence <strong>of</strong> lifetime<br />

gambling, from 35% in 1975 to 80% in 1998<br />

(National Opinion Research Center, 1999, in Tse,<br />

Hong, Wang & Cunningham-Williams, 2012,<br />

p. 639). Prevalence rates <strong>of</strong> lifetime pathological<br />

gambling varied widely based on the populations<br />

selected (e.g., older adults in nursing facilities<br />

versus those in casinos or bingo establishments),<br />

the gambling-assessment instruments used, and<br />

the types <strong>of</strong> gambling assessed (Tse et al, 2012).<br />

However, all studies consistently reported lower<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> problem/pathological gambling<br />

in older adults than in younger adults, and that<br />

gambling disorders were more prevalent among<br />

older males than older females (Tse et al, 2012, p.<br />

645).<br />

Stitt, Giacopassi and Nichols’ (2003) study <strong>of</strong> older<br />

adults and gambling in casinos suggests that casino<br />

gambling might not be a major threat to older adults.<br />

In a survey <strong>of</strong> 2,768 individuals, these researchers<br />

found that adults 63 and older were more likely<br />

to visit casinos than were adults 62 and younger;<br />

however, there were no age differences in the time<br />

spent in the casinos. A greater percentage <strong>of</strong> older<br />

females (43.7%) indicated they gambled than older<br />

males (33.3%). Older adults tended to spend less<br />

money gambling than younger adults, and fewer<br />

older adults reported losing more money than they<br />

could afford.<br />

100<br />

(Kessler, Hwang, LaBrie, Petukhova, Sampson, Winters, &<br />

Shaffer, 2008)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!