23.10.2014 Views

SCN News No 36 - UNSCN

SCN News No 36 - UNSCN

SCN News No 36 - UNSCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

www.unsystem.org/scn FEATURES 41<br />

“They (NGOs) are at odds with one another in many respects, and that makes the situation a little more<br />

confusing. That’s true for [all three countries].” (International NGO)<br />

Structural factors<br />

As suggested above, many of the disagreements concerning nutrition strategies and interventions are<br />

intimately related to divergence in institutional perspectives, interests and agendas. Other structural factors<br />

can also create challenges for the relevant actors. One such factor relates to short funding periods for<br />

externally-financed projects, interventions favoured by donors and other donor procedures and practices.<br />

“So at the time, the pervasive impression from the nutrition community was that that shift occurred because there was<br />

a lot of advocacy and a lot of pressure from donor agents, who wanted their micronutrient programs implemented in<br />

the (country).” (University professor in developing country)<br />

“<strong>No</strong>t being committed to intervention undermines the process. What we saw was efficient small scale programs<br />

financed by (donors), but these did not manage to make the jump to larger scale program. Whenever financing ends<br />

[], they just leave program to dead” (Donor agency)<br />

One of the most common problematic structural factors relates to institutional arrangements for promoting<br />

and coordinating a multisectoral approach to nutrition.<br />

“Multisectoral committee? It is fragmented. It was in the strategy that MoH should have the implementation role, and<br />

be coordinated by the Prime Minister. However, the Prime Minister does not have a coordinating power or mandate<br />

to coordinate the ministries” (Country nutrition actor)<br />

“[Country] established a National Food and Nutrition Committee in 1996, chaired by the Ministry of Agriculture. []<br />

However, without any budgetary authority, this committee remained largely ineffective in shaping nutrition policy and<br />

action.” (Country nutrition actor)<br />

Finally, poorly implemented de-centralization was a common structural sub-theme in many countries:<br />

“Decentralization, although it’s a great idea, really was more a failure than anything else because there was a<br />

total lack of capacity at the regional level to absorb those resources and (to) absorb the new<br />

mandates.” (International NGO)<br />

“Most of the de-centralization process is completely stuck on taxes that local government gets, and (on) the<br />

ministries refusing to give up their control over their system. ” (Donor agency)<br />

Strategies and tactics<br />

One of the most insightful and valuable themes to emerge from this study of country experiences relates to<br />

the wide variety of strategies and tactics used by nutrition actors to address, overcome or circumvent the<br />

many obstacles and complications described in the first four themes. These are clustered in three<br />

overlapping categories (Table 1). Molding and adapting to institutions refers primarily to strategies used to<br />

deal with the Structural Factors described above. Planning and agenda formation refers to strategies used<br />

specifically to seek agreement on a common agenda, and Leadership and Strategic Capacity refers to<br />

personal, interpersonal and tactical considerations involved in forming and advancing the agenda. Though<br />

the boundaries among these sub-themes are quite fuzzy, they begin to reveal a body of craft knowledge with<br />

considerable practical utility.<br />

The following quotes illustrate some strategies used to form agreement on a common agenda despite the<br />

existence of structural barriers, diverging institutional interests and points of contention:<br />

“NGOs got together and sort of formed a networking organization or an alliance. They agreed to put their logo on all<br />

the national program reports rather than trying to claim ownership for themselves, and things like that. So there was a<br />

period where there was a lot of, fairly large NGO-run programs, and they wanted to make it one national program,<br />

and they managed to get their act together to do that.” (International NGO)<br />

“[] they had a lot of disagreements but they always went ahead with one voice. They sat behind closed<br />

doors and didn’t get out, but then they put on a good face when they came out and had one<br />

recommendation. (Donor agency)<br />

“The 10-year plan and 5-year program became the references for external assistance to the health sector. The World<br />

Bank agreed to a US$40 million credit to assist the implementation of (the program).” (Country nutrition actor)<br />

These quotes reveal some strategies that have proven useful in aligning the diverse actors, building<br />

ownership and ensuring sustainability of commitment over time:<br />

back to contents <strong>SCN</strong> NEWS # <strong>36</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!