23.10.2014 Views

March/April 2009 www.FAOToday.com

March/April 2009 www.FAOToday.com

March/April 2009 www.FAOToday.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feature<br />

Shared Services<br />

vestment needed to create an in-house presence<br />

in a new location.<br />

• Improved Scalability. The external<br />

provider model is designed for flexibility, adding<br />

and contracting work within and across centers.<br />

Outsourcing can be part of an SSO’s strategy to<br />

add resources quickly to handle peak periods<br />

and scale back during slow periods.<br />

• Increased Access to Effective Practices and<br />

Specialized Skills. Outsourcing can improve a<br />

<strong>com</strong>pany’s access to industry practices and specialized<br />

capabilities that may be difficult to<br />

quickly obtain in-house.<br />

• Improved Business Continuity. Using several<br />

service providers can allow <strong>com</strong>panies to<br />

more easily turn to another service provider as<br />

backup if a primary provider falls through.<br />

• Enhanced Career Planning. Using outsourcers<br />

to <strong>com</strong>plement an internal SSO can<br />

allow the <strong>com</strong>pany to focus the SSO on highervalue<br />

activities and thereby provide more attractive<br />

career paths for SSO employees.<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Outsourcing relationships should be established<br />

and managed with a focus on customer<br />

service, service quality, and risk management;<br />

survey respondents reported that their internal<br />

SSO operations outperformed outsourcers in all<br />

these areas. In addition, each <strong>com</strong>pany should<br />

periodically reevaluate its SSO’s mix of inhouse<br />

and outsourced service delivery for continued<br />

alignment with the <strong>com</strong>pany’s cost and<br />

service goals.<br />

LOCATION & GLOBAL<br />

MANAGEMENT<br />

Reaching beyond in-country service delivery to<br />

take advantage of the cost arbitrage and talent<br />

pools of more distant geographies is be<strong>com</strong>ing<br />

standard operating procedure for SSOs. Our<br />

survey found that:<br />

• Slightly more than 40 percent of respondents<br />

had centers in the Americas. Seventy<br />

percent of those centers were in North America,<br />

and 30 percent were in Latin America.<br />

• Thirty-five percent had centers in Europe,<br />

the Middle East, and/or Africa. Of these, almost<br />

80 percent were in Europe, with the remainder<br />

in the Middle East/Africa sub-region.<br />

Figure 3: Percent of Outsourced Shared Operations<br />

29%<br />

39%<br />

11%<br />

25%<br />

13%<br />

24%<br />

20%<br />

22%<br />

16%<br />

20%<br />

IT Finance HR Legal Engineering Procurement Sales R&D Customer Real Estate<br />

Marketing<br />

Service<br />

19%<br />

10% 10%<br />

18%<br />

Today<br />

Within three years<br />

8%<br />

17%<br />

9%<br />

16%<br />

16%<br />

14%<br />

• Twenty-five percent of respondents had<br />

centers in the Asia-Pacific region. India, the<br />

Philippines, and China were the most popular<br />

locations in this region.<br />

While our study shows that regional centers<br />

are the predominant model today, nearly a third<br />

of our respondents operate in a “hub-andspoke”<br />

structure that splits work between a<br />

global center for highly transactional, locationagnostic<br />

processes and regional centers for specialized<br />

or location-specific processes,<br />

knowledge, or skills. (See Figure 4, page 53:<br />

What is the predominant operational model for your<br />

SSO?) By eliminating regional redundancy of<br />

simple, location-agnostic processes, a hub-andspoke<br />

arrangement can operate at a significantly<br />

lower cost than would be possible under<br />

a distributed model. In our experience, these<br />

savings can range from 25 percent to well over<br />

50 percent.<br />

Moving directly to a hub-and-spoke model<br />

from decentralized country operations can help<br />

a <strong>com</strong>pany realize the substantial benefits that<br />

the hub-and-spoke system can offer in as little<br />

as one-half to one-third of the time that it typically<br />

takes to evolve shared services up through<br />

the regions, and without the substantial rounds<br />

of labor and operating disruptions from multiple<br />

reorganizations. Factors to consider in such an<br />

initiative include:<br />

• Which Processes to Place in the “Hub”<br />

and which in the “Spokes.” Lower-valueadded,<br />

standardized, and automated processes<br />

are the best initial candidates for global hubs,<br />

while high-value-added, customer-facing, and<br />

interaction-intensive processes are generally<br />

placed in regional centers closer to the home<br />

country. As <strong>com</strong>panies be<strong>com</strong>e more <strong>com</strong>fortable<br />

with shared services, more <strong>com</strong>plex<br />

processes are often later moved to the global<br />

hub or outsourced.<br />

• Labor Quality and Availability. Increasing<br />

<strong>com</strong>petition for skilled resources in offshore<br />

markets makes it imperative to focus on<br />

the quality and availability of labor, as well as<br />

its cost. Companies should be alert to the risk<br />

of wage escalation, high turnover rates, and/or<br />

unfavorable labor climates in popular offshore<br />

locations.<br />

• Risks Associated with Out-of-Country<br />

Operations. Factors such as business customs,<br />

governmental issues, and cultural differences<br />

can make distant centers more difficult to establish,<br />

operate, and govern than nearby ones.<br />

The choice between established and pioneering<br />

locations depends on a <strong>com</strong>pany’s <strong>com</strong>fort<br />

with the trade-off between costs and risks related<br />

to labor, infrastructure, geopolitical conflicts,<br />

language, and cost escalation.<br />

56 FAO Today <strong>March</strong>/<strong>April</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

<strong>www</strong>.faotoday.<strong>com</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!