23.10.2014 Views

training exercises - Tellus Institute

training exercises - Tellus Institute

training exercises - Tellus Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3.7 Resource Costs<br />

Finally, under the Resources section of the tree, you will specify the unit costs for<br />

indigenously produced and imported primary resources and secondary fuels. Use the<br />

following information to enter these costs.<br />

Primary Resources (Indigenous production and imports):<br />

• Coal - $20/tonne in 2000, rising to $30/tonne in 2030<br />

• Natural gas - $0.1/m 3 in 2000, rising to $0.2/m 3 in 2030<br />

• Crude Oil - $30/tonne, rising to $50/tonne in 2030<br />

Secondary Resources:<br />

• Diesel, Gasoline, LPG, kerosene and Fuel Oil - $300/tonne in 2000, rising to<br />

$400/tonne in 2030<br />

• Electricity is not priced here since you are modeling electricity costs instead on<br />

the basis of input fuel and power plant costs.<br />

Enter this base year cost data in the Current Accounts scenario since all of the scenarios<br />

assume the same unit costs. Cost projections can be entered once for the Reference scenario.<br />

4.4 Showing Cost-Benefit Results<br />

In the Manage scenarios screen you can click the check boxes on the tree to indicate which<br />

scenarios should be calculated. To keep the results reasonably simple at first you may want to<br />

check only the Reference and Mitigation Scenarios.<br />

In the Summaries view you can<br />

display the Net Present Value (NPV)<br />

of the mitigation scenario relative to<br />

another selected scenario. The NPV<br />

is the sum of all discounted costs and<br />

benefits in one scenario minus another<br />

(summing across all years of the<br />

study).<br />

You should see results similar to those<br />

shown on the right. Notice that these<br />

indicate that on the demand- side the<br />

Mitigation scenario shows costs more<br />

than the Reference scenario (since<br />

here we are investing capital and<br />

O&M into energy efficiency<br />

measures) but that this is more than<br />

made up for in savings in the<br />

Transformation modules and in<br />

avoided resource requirements, so that<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!